I’ll start out by stating that I did enjoy the Trespasser story.
However when things got down to the end choices I was left struggling to pick choices that my inquisitors would make. In the time since I’ve been really thinking hard over what bugs me & it’s is that the inquisitor felt suddenly diminished. I’m not talking about the obvious physical diminishment that happens which is interesting but the characterisation diminishment.
Suddenly the inquisitor can only choose to be the pet toy of the divine(over who they only had an indirect sway in appointment) or complete disbandment.
The option for Dalish inquisitors to try and go off with Solas is illusory & then ignored. While frustrating this isn’t even my biggest bugbear.
That is reserved for the fact inquisitors can spend the main game expressed independence & desiring to use the power at the fingertips to make change are cut off at the knees. The most extreme of the options in ‘my heart shall burn’ is ‘I’ll do it for my own power’, which certainly doesn’t conform to the sacrificial choices of trespasser. The inquisitor is robbed of a large sense of agency or control of the inquisition’s fate. It’s suddenly subservient to the Divine & therefore choosing to be her personal guard or nothing. Personally I think there should have been other options even if these were much more negative. The simple choice of ‘status quo’ should have been there even if that led to betrayal by advisors/splintering of inquisition/Ferleden and Orlais besieging Skyhold or whatever.
I understand that they most likely wanted to make things easier for themselves in the next installment. However the extreme limitations at end to Trespasser left me with the feeling that I don’t ever want to see the inquisitor again, as he/she is seemingly strapped into a characterisation straightjacket I don’t welcome.





Retour en haut






