5 réponses à ce sujet

[htisscrimbliv]

I wanted to try making a duel wield warrior with the new rogue amulet, and on it is a minus 50% flanking damage. The problem is u only start with 25. So if u have no stat increases for that specifically, would it only go to 0, or to -25%?

[devSin]

A flanking attack would only do 75% its intended damage in your example.

[Evelynne]

Yes you can have Negative, but if you're tanking, most things are going to be facing you anyways -- especially if you're using the Taunt on Flask of Frost. If you took that Necklace -- without any Flanking Damage (not a lot of Dex either), you would have a .75 flanking damage modifier if you struck something in the flank. 

 

I personally think Andraste's Sacrifice is a better tanking necklace than Melka's, but Melka's is useful for survivability. 

[PapaCharlie9]

A flanking attack would only do 75% its intended damage in your example.

Right. It's 1 + your Flanking Damage, so 1 + (.25 + -50) is .75.

 

But what if your negative flanking is like -200%? Since the factor is multiplicative, kind of seems like you'll end up with negative final damage. Does the target heal every time you hit it?

 

Probably an adjusted_damage = max(1, final_damage) is in play.

[Bigdawg13]

Right. It's 1 + your Flanking Damage, so 1 + (.25 + -50) is .75.

But what if your negative flanking is like -200%? Since the factor is multiplicative, kind of seems like you'll end up with negative final damage. Does the target heal every time you hit it?

Probably an adjusted_damage = max(1, final_damage) is in play.

Hey! Turn on friendly fire and nuke your allies to heal them.

[Rynas]

Right. It's 1 + your Flanking Damage, so 1 + (.25 + -50) is .75.

 

But what if your negative flanking is like -200%? Since the factor is multiplicative, kind of seems like you'll end up with negative final damage. Does the target heal every time you hit it?

 

Probably an adjusted_damage = max(1, final_damage) is in play.

 

Yep, minimum damage per hit is 1.