11 réponses à ce sujet

[TraiHarder]

Sadly right now I only have enough for one dlc so should I just get tresspasser?

[movie_diva]

I would get it, because it wraps up the story, but if you do, make a separate save before you play it, so if you do get the other DLC you can play from there, and not have to start over.

[NoForgiveness]

Yes.

[katerinafm]

If you like the game and would like a conclusion, yes.

[myahele]

I'd say is worth it due to it being the end of the game, nicely wraps the story and has additional character interactions

[Nefla]

Yes.

[CoM Solaufein]

Yes. Otherwise it would be like reading a book and not reading the last chapter.

[Madrict]

Yes get Trespasser! It is Brilliant and well worth it. Completes the story

[drummerchick]

As long as you don't need that cash for other things like food or medicine -- bah, what am I saying? Play Trespasser and you can die happy. 

[Belladoni]

If you are asking if Trespasser should be your first choice of the three dlc, then yes, I'd recommend it first.

 

My preferences:

 

1.  Trespasser

2.  Jaws of Hakkon (I actually enjoyed this one more than Trespasser play-wise, but the lore is the heart of the story, and Trespasser is the most important there, IMO)

3.  Descent (though you would be fine never getting this one, IMO.)

 

Have fun!

[IRON SKORPIQN]

Jaws of Hakon & Tresspasser are worthy DLC's.... Descent is poor.

[TraiHarder]

Thank you everyone for your suggestions seems like a consensus on getting trespasser