Well, you know...
1) that the Reapers would probably just be wise to this tactic being often used by this cycle, right?
2) the Miracle of Palaven was a specific maneuver that required the sacrifice of several Turian dreadnoughts by itself?
Ship power had to act as a bait.
Troops had to land in the gaps and smuggle WMDs in.
People with these WMDs had to enter Reapers.
That's several layers of 'we lose many, they might lose more, unless they detect us'.
Seriously it took putting dreadnoughts and fleets directly into harms way just to put any significant dent in Reaper numbers. Its not just the groups that enter the Reapers. The Reapers are already too wise to that, and would otherwise have much more significantly stemmed any flow of WMDs.
Its certainly true that a person with a big weapon can tear up the inside of a Reaper and 'kill' it. But its just as true that its hard to get people with big weapons in, and its hard to get the big weapons into these people's hands, and its likely hard to do it again in an area once the Reapers figure out that this is a tactic for this cycle's armed forces.
In the meantime, while we're not shown the visuals of it, destroying a Reaper/Destroyer/Processer/etc that is receiving civilians for harvesting is actively allowing Reapers to maybe fill up with thousands to millions(?). That's also something that they have to accept if they want to use this tactic, as opposed to direct firepower and diverting Reapers away from civilians.
I agree that this is a valid broad tactic. But I definitely disagree with the sentence "So if it only takes a dozen or a hundred organics to walk a bomb into a reaper ship that wants them to walk in and make sure it goes off then yes, they will win the war of numbers."
I wasn't meaning to use the battle of Palaven as an example of military tactics, from the diversion/infiltration standpoint, but as a more basic proof of concept within the game. The thought that all wmds would have to be flown in only after reapers had begun harvesting is a bit foolish. Once proof of concept is achieved I would expect massive upscale in production across organic space and distributed across major worlds that the reapers would harvest rather then just bombard from orbit. Even without that does anyone think the Krogan are above suicide bombing the reapers with their massive stockpile of wmds, or that their the only specious with suck stockpiles and desperation? This alone proves that a ground force with no fleet can wipe out more ships then the cycle harvest will replace meaning that in a long war of attrition, fought over thousands of cycles the reapers could lose to this one tactic alone even if only used successfully once or twice a cycle.
Do I think it would grant victory on it's own? No. But when paired with other proven strategies like the turians dreadnoughts ftl jumping into knife fighting range and wider use of thanix cannons all these strategies that are only slowing down the reapers are turning a 200 year harvest into a 300, 400, 500 year harvest and who knows what new tech or how many ships a desperate people will be able to create in that amount of time. Even if not, Liara leaves a wide array of time capsules across the galaxy witch almost certainly contain every proven way to kill a reaper.
And if I remember right shooting the Star Child basically means the fleet at earth is wiped out but we don't see what happens after, only that at some point in the future the reapers are wiped out by organics and a very human looking old man is telling a boy the story of the Shepard. Whose to say that 200 years into the harvest the organics turned the tide and wiped out the reapers without the crucible? Or that the next cycle tried to use a failed weapon design like the crucible instead of simply building 5,000 dreadnoughts and tens of thousands of thanix equipped frigates.





Retour en haut






