Adults Only: Have a challenge based on sexual subjects, nudity, and general erotic content.
Custom Content Challenge: October 2015: Adults Only
#1
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 02:36
#2
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 02:37
Intended/Announced Projects:
"Seed" Golem (creature model) by The Mad Poet
Emailed/Downloaded Projects:
Strap On (PC/NPC part) by Darkniciad
Fat Bottom Girls (PC/NPC parts) by Grymlorde
Seduca (creature models) by OldTimeRadio
Harpy (creature model) by PLUSH HYENA of DOOM
Incubus (creature model) by Shemsu-Heru
Ivy Valentine (creature model) by Shemsu-Heru
Woman in Sexy Leather (creature model) by Shemsu-Heru
#3
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 05:00
Still waiting for all those pre-work suggestions! ![]()
How about some nudity without genitals?
#4
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 09:37
Thanks for have chosen "Adults only".
Finding inspiration material for this challenge shouldn't be difficult. So I'm not going to provide to much of them. I just have a suggestion:
There is a D20 manual; "Encyclopaedia Arcane: Nymphology", by "Mongoose Publishing"; Which fits completely with this topic, and could be a great source of inspiration:
![]()
http://www.dandwiki....ane:_Nymphology
This fully manual can be found freely here: http://www.armchairp...-Nymphology.pdf
- OldTimeRadio aime ceci
#5
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 10:13
I won't be taking part in this month's challenge. Not for any prudish reasons though. I do, do things other than NwN (Borderlands 2 atm & loving it) plus the nature of this challenge is such that I don't have the necessary technical skills as it all looks 3d (no I am not going to make any brothel posters). Some thoughts for those considering taking part this month.
- One thing I have noticed in the description is that it doesn't specifically state that it exclusively applies to humans or anthropomorphic creatures. Mating Mammoths anyone?
- Also, sexuality is mentioned. This word covers a wide area (fetishes, S&M etc.). This means any equipment associated with sex, should be fair game.
- Bucket of cold water anyone?
- New animations (no not that) such as for a real hair pulling, claws out cat fight between jealous rivals.
TR
#6
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 10:23
some ideas:
- sexy clothes and lingerie.
- Streeper dance animations.
- New animations for the sexual interactions phenotype.
- New behaviours for some creatures; What about of satyrs, nymphs or succubi who try to seduce an opposite sex player character, instead of attack them directly...
- Spells that remove clothes or armor.
- Humor is also welcome:


#7
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 10:36
Thanks for have chosen "Adults only".
Finding inspiration material for this challenge shouldn't be difficult. So I'm not going to provide to much of them. I just have a suggestion:
There is a D20 manual; "Encyclopaedia Arcane: Nymphology", by "Mongoose Publishing"; Which fits completely with this topic, and could be a great source of inspiration:
http://www.dandwiki....ane:_Nymphology
This fully manual can be found freely here: http://www.armchairp...-Nymphology.pdf
A dude named Spoony just recently made a (semi-funny) vid talking about that Nymphology book: link (mildly NSFW, but just because of language and the general topic). He also made one about the Book of Erotic Fantasy earlier.
I just hope there won't be a Creamy Ooze coming out of this month's challenge... ![]()
#8
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 11:27
I just hope there won't be a Creamy Ooze coming out of this month's challenge...
Attack it! No, YOU attack it!
- The Mad Poet et MerricksDad aiment ceci
#9
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 02:17
I'm not a modeler so I just put this out here as a suggestion for people who are. G Rex has made a whole nice new set of body models, which I think Pstemarie is planning to (or has already) pulled into Q. It would be great if someone could produce nude and lingerie parts that work right and look right with these new base parts. Like the pieces from the ACAG hak. I could provide the renumbered parts from ACAG that I currently use if anyone is interested. I have them moved up to the 220+ sort of range to be out of the way of other content.
So yes, there are these things already, but many will likely be broken by these excellent new bodies...
#10
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 04:46
Gunner's new bodies are an incredible piece of work to have available as a resource. However, If anyone is going to be doing actual geometry work with them, check out the following things before proceeding:
- Not sure if the female torsos are jiggly. Could be wrong about that.
- Breasts (on my AMD card) show a line of shading mid-swell because of a slight modeling error in how the breast swells from the root to the tip.
- If you have access to 3DS Max, the ProOptimizer modifier could probably do a very good job bringing down the polycount while still retaining model integrity.
I'm working on a torso+pelvis only skin mesh right now. Doing it like this avoids all the problems I can think of which involve skin mesh and animations/emotes. It still looks a little weird in game for me. Maybe it's because for this test I tried to color match to prostitute's very pale skin. Maybe it's something with the modeling. I don't know yet. It needs a lot more work than it looks like in the screenshot. One unexpected bonus is that because pelvic region of skin mesh is weighted for thigh bones as well as pelvis, the vulva appears to open as the legs do.

I might have to chuck this and go to something else if this doesn't wind up working right. I'd love to hear what other participants are using for their base models.
OFFER: If anyone is participating in the challenge this month and would like a symmetrical, non-skinmesh model ProOptimized (i.e. reduce the triangles in it), drop me a PM with a link to download that specific model only (I'm not going to hunt through haks) and what percent you want it chopped and I'll do my best to help you out with that. Please include a non-plt skin if possible so I can make sure UV coordinates don't change too much during the process. Weekend is busy but things should open up after 3-4 days.
- Shemsu-Heru aime ceci
#11
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 05:08
Here is where I admit how intimidated I feel by the sheer talent in this community. So far, I've limited my contributions to pre-fabs because while my modeling skills are at best that of a 'notepad-modeling' and I'm quite comfortable with editing .2da files, I feel like a kindergartner when I see the fantastic art assets you folks have been giving us gratis for more than a decade.
Here's my dilemma: Using NWN Armoury, I've managed to re-size the large female human pelvis, thighs, biceps, and calves to approximate those of my favorite plus-side model Diva Bombshell a.k.a. Mikel Ruffinelli (Jenni Bombshell at the same site is a very close second favorite). I've devoted countless hours of trial & error and I've finally come up with proportions I've happy with. I've resized several outfits from CEP & Q and some work nicely while others don't (sex clothes work best, armour the worst). However, since this was done with NWN Armoury rather than GMAX there is a lot of clipping. I'm quite happy with the results as I'm willing to overlook the severe clipping (forearms & weapons inside hips & thighs) in return for watching those sashaying hips and thighs. Not everyone's cup of tea, but certainly mine.
I guess what I'm really asking, 'is there a minimum quality required for models?'
And for that matter, am I going to offend anyone with content that some will love and others will find disgusting?
Modifié par Grymlorde, 02 octobre 2015 - 08:43 .
#12
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 06:39
Grymlorde if you don't want to offend anybody, you could always make some posters... ![]()
TR
- Grymlorde aime ceci
#13
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 08:51
@Grymlorde:
I don't see why such content would be offensive, at least no more offensive than the rest of the challenge. Those could be alternative models for the large phenotype. People who don't like, don't have to use them as always....
#14
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 09:11
@Grymlorde - All of this is my opinion, obviously. To me the CCC is about drawing people just like you more deeply into the world of custom content and giving them a safe, judgement-free space to show off their work. The goal is to help budding modders become better at what they do and for more experienced modders to challenge themselves. If you genuinely put effort into making those pieces, then you have met what I sincerely hope is the only criteria we ever place on people who are just starting out. Anything more is going to be the death of us, sooner or later.
And for that matter, am I going to offend anyone with content that some will love and others will find disgusting?
Make custom content for yourself. If people wind up liking it, why that's just gravy on top the biscuits.
- Zwerkules, boodah83, Tarot Redhand et 5 autres aiment ceci
#15
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 10:14
If people were that bloody offended by Adult content why the heck did it take 30% of the total vote?
Food for thought.
- Pstemarie, Wall3T et 3RavensMore aiment ceci
#16
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 10:39
why the heck did it take 30% of the total vote?
Beats the hell out of me. <wishes there was a puzzled emoji>
TR
#17
Posté 02 octobre 2015 - 11:58
If people were that bloody offended by Adult content why the heck did it take 30% of the total vote?
Food for thought.
Clearly that's a rhetorical question. ![]()
I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that some people aren't really sure about this topic, so allow me to reframe it just a tiny bit. Why titillate the player? Same reason you give them that +5 vorpal longsword: to reward them. Perhaps not the only reason, but it is one. There are also degrees here, and progression curves. You start out by giving them a +1 sword after an early success perhaps. Similarly, maybe advancing the story lets them meet a potential love interest the first time. That first meeting shouldn't be the fan service equivalent to that +5 vorpal longsword. Point is, there are plenty of people here who don't want to play Diablo in NWN, but who also recognize the value in the occasional fancy or flashy artifact. There's also value in hinting at and acknowledging various forms of adult content, as well as making use of it as a form of variety to break up the power fantasies. I'm going to stop now before I stretch this analogy past the breaking point.
Most of the suggestions I've thought of so far have been mentioned already, and I think a lot of them are pretty good.
Not quite "adult", but I'd love to see some new animations in the spirit of Ninjaweaselman's Romantic Animation Suite. The romantic one. Or some new dancing animations. I only know of like one or two.
- OldTimeRadio, 3RavensMore, Shemsu-Heru et 2 autres aiment ceci
#18
Posté 03 octobre 2015 - 02:18
When it became apparent that this would probably be the theme for this month, I started checking up on whatever existing adult content I could find. I am sure there are some models (probably torsos and groins) that I missed, but I did come across the Phenotype 75 animations, which also add to the erotic animations available to the community. I haven't gotten a chance to look at them in Max yet but the description inside one of the haks seemed to indicate a whole 'nother set of naughty things (10 more anims) available.
#19
Posté 03 octobre 2015 - 01:17
I'm almost positive FB made a Phenotype 76 at some point. It was a different set of animations. Some were F/F specific. I've seen them once, but I don't recall ever finding them again. *sigh*
#20
Posté 03 octobre 2015 - 01:42
Actually I'll start off. This is just an edited version of Shadguy's Blood Elemental from the Ravenloft CCC. Provided everything is OK with them with just editing this as is (I think CCC is all open anyway, right?) I'll add this on.
It's, you know, THAT golem.

Just need to figure out how to turn all that splashy blood emitting out of them white and it'll be gold.
- Zarathustra217, shadguy et Shemsu-Heru aiment ceci
#21
Posté 03 octobre 2015 - 02:17
The blood golem is adapted from Amethyst Dragon's Water Elemental, with his permission. Have at it. Removing the emitters should be all you need to do to get rid of the blood FX. I think the thing had one set of emitters for eyes, and another for splashes, so once you sort out which is which, you're all set.
-Dave
#22
Posté 03 octobre 2015 - 07:08
@Grymlorde - All of this is my opinion, obviously. To me the CCC is about drawing people just like you more deeply into the world of custom content and giving them a safe, judgement-free space to show off their work. The goal is to help budding modders become better at what they do and for more experienced modders to challenge themselves. If you genuinely put effort into making those pieces, then you have met what I sincerely hope is the only criteria we ever place on people who are just starting out. Anything more is going to be the death of us, sooner or later.
And for that matter, am I going to offend anyone with content that some will love and others will find disgusting?
Make custom content for yourself. If people wind up liking it, why that's just gravy on top the biscuits.
Thanks @OldTimeRadio for sharing your opinion. I'm convinced now.
My submission this month will be "re-scaled hips & thighs for the large female human phenotype."
#23
Posté 04 octobre 2015 - 10:56

Incubus
lncubi are the male counterparts to succubi, but they are far less common. These creatures travel to the Prime Material Plane to tempt female mortals. These creatures always appear as the most perfect male specimen of whatever race they are tempting.
Made from: "http://www.cgrealm.o...1194801443&n=2"

Also includes two naked version of the incubus; A relaxing one, and another "ready for action" (This one also use the animations from the intimate phenotype: LINK)
- Proleric, Tarot Redhand, OldTimeRadio et 1 autre aiment ceci
#24
Posté 05 octobre 2015 - 07:38
How about a clothes/armour specialist making a cross dressing hak?
#25
Posté 06 octobre 2015 - 05:59
How about a clothes/armour specialist making a cross dressing hak?
Maybe rather female dress for infiltration as "damsels". Some maid outfit for example.
Fake beards/moustache for girls wanting to join the army..





Retour en haut







