31 réponses à ce sujet

[TheKomandorShepard]

What i fail to understand about Hawke is why he removed the seals from COrypheus prison out of the player controls? 

i don't release terrorist magister into the world because i think that i can kill them

Yeah , it was another moment of stupidity if Hawke decided to side with  larius ,instead to seal him again hawke released him.

 

 

 There thing you can do to try to solve thing but when thing in the environment that are gunning to counter anything you do that you can't control, how can you say you are at fault?

 

The darkspawn killed on of hawke sibling. Nothing they could about that. Nothing hawke could do to stop that orge.

 

One of his sibling get tainted. Nothing hawke can do but not bring them there and they still lose them any way to the circle or templers.

 

Hawke's mom died. Even if Hawke warned her they would of still lost her being that this was a blood mage and they though she went on a date.

 

The Qunari uprising. The qunari were stress and could not leave with out the book which Hawke did not know where it was at. Add, people of the chantry who Hawke can't control egged the qunari on by attacking them.

 

The mage uprising. Hawke can tell Anders to leave from Act 2 and the man is still there to bomb the chantry.

 

 

Sorry, but How can Hawke be a failure for things out of their control. What could even be done. Even if Hawke was not involved all this would of happened except for  Cory and the idol getting lose....And Hawke would of still be hunted down to use them to release Cory.

Once again , Hawke could keep things in control in many instances but was too dumb or once again acted when problem was too far gone...

 

Well ,outside killing that ogre? But i will give you that it wasn't rly on Hawke , and i never claimed it was...

 

Yes, they could have not bring him there so either way it is screw up on Hawke part if he decides take his sibling , but it is optional screw up.

 

From what i recall Hawke could have go after said serial killer and even find his hideout ,but instead search place thoroughly hawke left... So yes Hawke could have do a lot if he had brain. 

 

Qunari attack could have been easily thwarted (or at least Hawke could have significantly delay it) if Hawke had brain ,Hawke had 2 opportunities to kill Petrice leader and brain of people that were trying launch war with qunari , he didn't.Second he could even deliver book to Arishok and killed/captured thief , now instead running after Isabela that went after book hawke decided to indulge in fight between qunari and tevinter resulting in Isabela escaping with book. 

 

The mage uprising , hawke knows that Anders is an abomnation , hawke kills Anders and Anders can't blow up chantry because he is dead.

 

 

So, nope.

[leaguer of one]

Yeah , it was another moment of stupidity if Hawke decided to side with  larius ,instead to seal him again hawke released him.

 

 

Once again , Hawke could keep things in control in many instances but was too dumb or once again acted when problem was too far gone...

 

Well ,outside killing that ogre? But i will give you that it wasn't rly on Hawke , and i never claimed it was...

 

Yes, they could have not bring him there so either way it is screw up on Hawke part if he decides take his sibling , but it is optional screw up.

 

From what i recall Hawke could have go after said serial killer and even find his hideout ,but instead search place thoroughly hawke left... So yes Hawke could have do a lot if he had brain. 

 

Qunari attack could have been easily thwarted (or at least Hawke could have significantly delay it) if Hawke had brain ,Hawke had 2 opportunities to kill Petrice leader and brain of people that were trying launch war with qunari , he didn't.Second he could even deliver book to Arishok and killed/captured thief , now instead running after Isabela that went after book hawke decided to indulge in fight between qunari and tevinter resulting in Isabela escaping with book. 

 

The mage uprising , hawke knows that Anders is an abomnation , hawke kills Anders and Anders can't blow up chantry because he is dead.

 

 

So, nope.

1.Even if  they did not take their siblings they were still gone, so it was lose /lose.

 

2.The guards checked the area, the templers did as well and the only way Hawke found the killer the last time was because the killer got sloppy. So no to that.

 

3.He did not with Patreci. The first and second tiem she had chartry back up to allow her to escape. So no to that.

And Hawke had no choice in that tevintor /Qunari fight, the blocked them and attacked them.

4. Agein, Ander could be gone from book 2 and he still blows up the charntry. And hawke does not know till it's too late to do any thing about it.

[Big I]

Only three things seemed weird for me about Hawke in DAI:

 

1. Hawke is anti-blood magic, even if you Friendshipped Merril, even if they are a blood mage. That was odd.

 

2. Hawke will refer to a Warden Loghain as their "friend in the Wardens". Considering non-mage Hawke fought at Ostagar, that was bizarre.

 

3. If they survive Adamant, Hawke abandons the fight against Corypheus to travel to the Anderfels. WTH?

[TheKomandorShepard]

1.Even if  they did not take their siblings they were still gone, so it was lose /lose.

 

2.The guards checked the area, the templers did as well and the only way Hawke found the killer the last time was because the killer got sloppy. So no to that.

 

3.He did not with Patreci. The first and second tiem she had chartry back up to allow her to escape. So no to that.

And Hawke had no choice in that tevintor /Qunari fight, the blocked them and attacked them.

4. Agein, Ander could be gone from book 2 and he still blows up the charntry. And hawke does not know till it's too late to do any thing about it.

 

1.Not rly, their siblings (well bethany is found by templars but she decides to join circle) leave on their own and is still alive and even lives in kirkwall.

 

2.The guards did crappy job (in first place they had hard time beliving there was serial killer) so did hawke ,literally all hawke was required to do is to search place and find huge hatch.

 

3.Eee, no? During first opportunity she had only 1 templar , during second opportunity she was around with templar and few angry folks but wasn't protected by them standing right next to hawke and hawke lets her escape when he could have easily killed her.

That is outright false (but well with you im prepared for you making up false things and stand by them) , Isabela and Hawke had clear exit ,isabela escapes hawke stays to fight (lol).

 

4.Absolutely irrelevant argument that has nothing to do with what i have said...

Me:Hawke could have killed Anders and Anders wouldn't blow up chantry becuase he would be dead.

You:No , because Hawke can let Anders live and let him leave Hawke party and he still blows up chantry.

Me:Wat?

Also ,false Hawke knows Anders is an abomnation already in 1 Act , then he is even shown to Hawke to be more unstable during his quest in act 2, and then pretty much ask you to distract grand cleric so he can get to the chantry. It was not hard to figure out that Anders was dangerous abomnation.

[The_Prophet_of_Donk]

Your Hawke is a monster.

Bethany

After speaking with Meredith and listening to her story, he knew that magic was too much for any one person.....

[Dai Grepher]

??

When people perceive something to be their fault, they tend to feel more guilty about it, not less.

 

But in that Hawke's case he felt justified in killing her. So he didn't see it as a wrong in the first place.
 

[Orian Tabris]

My 2nd Hawke was of the angry jerkface variety, but in Inquisition she seemed more like a brooding goody-goody.

 

Does anyone know if Hawke's personality changes depending on which one you chose in DA2? I didn't really notice a difference between the sarcastic and aggressive Hawkes, minus them having different VAs.