Aller au contenu

Photo

The Avenger is deadly when fired at full-auto...


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
57 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Fidite Nemini

Fidite Nemini
  • Members
  • 5 734 messages

Assault rifles should be very deadly, I didn't understend ME3 aproach, hand guns exploding heads and assault rifles doing nothing. Damn it MP, weapon balance sucks.

 

On MP each character, but the soldier, should have on side weapon slot plus a main weapon slot, no cooldown penalty as well.

 

The issue is, without having obstrusive mechanics that prevent ubiquitious use of primary weapons, sidearms would never see action.

 

Not that I wouldn't mind obstrusive mechanics, they can be a great vector to help differentiate/balance weapons aside from damage output, accuracy and endurance.

If we were to revert to the cooldown system like in ME1, you could have primary weapons suffer from longer cooldowns if not used endurance maximizingly (firing in burst and letting it cool in between instead of just holding down the trigger until it smokes), using a sidearm as fallback weapon whilst the primary cools down could have them see frequent use even they aren't nearly as good as the primary weapons (which only makes sense for them to be because, duh- physics; can only cram so much gun into little spaces).

 

Or maybe impact non-combat powers if handled with primary weapons (takes longer to properly reach the omni-tool or go through the activating motions to fire up a biotic power when you're handling a longer and heavier weapon), which would provide a gameplay incentive to switch to the compact sidearm when you want to use non-combat powers more frequently (and I mean this in addition to the weight attributes/balance, weight and bulk are two different things, trying to reach your omnitool when handling a huge-ass weapon like a Widow or Typhoon os harder than with an equally weighty, but more compact Claymore for example, say an activation delay instead of a cooldown penalty in terms of gameplay numbers).

 

Or we throw any such notions of weapon authenticity away (or rather, not introduce them to the series as it stands) and keep small pistols doing as much damage as full-sized sniper rifles ...


  • marcelo caldas et KrrKs aiment ceci

#52
Luke Pearce

Luke Pearce
  • Members
  • 330 messages

I didn't find the Avenger to be exciting. The Mattock (and Harrier) though, those are beastly! I prefer semi-auto rather than full-auto.



#53
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 144 messages

I loved the Avenger's sound effect. 

 

I used it on a few missions just for that reason.



#54
Altair_ShepardN7

Altair_ShepardN7
  • Members
  • 441 messages

The Avenger is deadly at full auto because you'll run out of ammo/overheat before you kill a trash mob, leaving you exposed.


  • MaxCrushmore aime ceci

#55
Mordokai

Mordokai
  • Members
  • 2 031 messages

Gimme mah Claymore and/or mah Raider.

 

Don't need anything else.



#56
kajtarp

kajtarp
  • Members
  • 423 messages

yesterday i played some pugs with katana / avenger on gold. even tough i did well,can't say i enjoyed those games. not one bit.



#57
CHRrOME

CHRrOME
  • Members
  • 666 messages

oh please, Turian Soldier turns every weapon with the marksman power great. No matter how shitty accuracy or rate of fire a gun has, marksman will do wonders with it.

 

I'm afraid I'll have to disagree. The Scimitar is just crap no matter what; the Raptor is utter crap and Marksman does not help it one bit; the Incisor is the same piece of useless garbage with a more uncontrollable recoil now due to the now increased RoF; and the Avenger... is meh in the absolute best case scenario, say AR amp III, incendiary rounds IV and all that jazz.



#58
ManOfSteel

ManOfSteel
  • Members
  • 3 716 messages

Sure. As long as it doesn't appear in cutscenes when my characters are already carrying other Assault Rifles. I like you, Avenger, but stop hogging all the glory.