I was reading an article explaining why the writer thought that Corypheus wasn't an effective or even well-realized villain despite the potential. An interesting read for anyone who wants to see his views for themselves: http://johnswritersb...sition-ending1/
But while critiquing Corypheus, he asks why the Fear Demon can't be the main villain and then...the points that he makes are actually pretty remarkable in the context of Inquisition's story.
To quote:
...Of course the most interesting aspect of having the Fear Demon as the villain would have been that we were no longer just fighting armies and demons…we’d be fighting an idea, and ideas never truly die. Even if we drove fear back into the fade, it would still be there waiting and feeding. Growing strong until the day it could emerge back into Thedas once again…"
Yeah...as much as I like Corypheus, I can't help, but to agree. With proper build-up, foreshadowing and etc., a variant of this idea would be a great twist worthy of the "You are Revan" moment and would serve to give Inquisition a stronger antagonist. If done badly...it would just as bad as the Star-Child. Plus, you'd be facing an opponent who can't really be beaten because the Fear Demon embodies something that is present in everyone and can never truly be destroyed. Plus, it's constantly feeding from people's fears and even the bravest heroes are afraid of something as having courage doesn't mean the absence of fear.
So I like the idea. Anyone else?





Retour en haut







