Elves cant lift greatswords...
#1
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 09:48
- TeffexPope aime ceci
#2
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 09:50
Probably could lift it at least. Other than that, not much else. ![]()
Not sure the difference in size with Fenris in DA2, but I found him believable enough then. Here the male elves look lke me when I was 10, except with an adult-like head.
- robertmarilyn aime ceci
#3
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 10:17
#5
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 10:29
They're waaaaay too tiny. Come on now.
They have wiry strength. And everyone in Thedas spends time at the gym. Put them in an Antaam-saar, and see. I honestly don't know when my Lavellan had time to get ripped abs like that.
If you're looking for an in-universe explanation (rather than a Doylian "Fans would scream if we race-restricted weapons") then how about the Mark? Lyrium and red lyrium makes Templars physically stronger, arcane-warriors and knight-enchanters use magic to boost their physical strength, so you can use magic to boost strength. It's not unimaginable that the inquisitor could be channelling physical strength through their mark.
#6
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 10:32
They have wiry strength. And everyone in Thedas spends time at the gym. Put them in an Antaam-saar, and see. I honestly don't know when my Lavellan had time to get ripped abs like that.
If you're looking for an in-universe explanation (rather than a Doylian "Fans would scream if we race-restricted weapons") then how about the Mark? Lyrium and red lyrium makes Templars physically stronger, arcane-warriors and knight-enchanters use magic to boost their physical strength, so you can use magic to boost strength. It's not unimaginable that the inquisitor could be channelling physical strength through their mark.
They were still supposed to be Hunters before that.. and as a Dalish warrior specifically, probably carried on the martial skills of the Emerald Knights. They shouldn't need an entirely new magic mark to be competent.
It's just purely a bad choice on the artists' parts. Not a lore reason.
#7
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 10:53
Well most of the two-handed weapons are stupid big for anyone, but the male elf inquisitor body model leaves much to be desired, both Solas and Fenris have better ones. I hope they up their body model game for DA4.
- Tamyn et CDR Aedan Cousland aiment ceci
#8
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 11:02
The claymore is typically what is considered the 'Great Sword'. It weighed about 5.5 lbs. Yep... less than a gallon of milk. So let's just say that the scale of weapons in games are more than a little exaggerated.
- Korva, Evamitchelle, Absafraginlootly et 12 autres aiment ceci
#9
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 11:08
I been playing RPGs since FF1 was release and it still bugs that the weapons is way to big.
Ever notice how a long bow or long sword is almost dragging the ground?
- Elista aime ceci
#10
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 11:44
- Tamyn, AntiChri5, Aulis Vaara et 4 autres aiment ceci
#11
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 12:03
You're falling for the greatswords are super heavy movie/videogame myth. Read this for historical accuracy. Making greatswords heavy and slow in video games is a gameplay balancing contrivance, not a representation of how they were actually wielded.
Still doesn't help the male elf appearance... which is the OP's real point. I think?
- jedidotflow aime ceci
#12
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 12:37
Still doesn't help the male elf appearance... which is the OP's real point. I think?
If his complaint was that elves are ridiculously proportioned and the models are poorly rigged, he should have said so. If he had, I'd heartily agree, but coming at it from a false premise does nothing to advance his argument.
#13
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 12:47
If his complaint was that elves are ridiculously proportioned and the models are poorly rigged, he should have said so. If he had, I'd heartily agree, but coming at it from a false premise does nothing to advance his argument.
I don't think it's an argument exactly...
Uh... I think. I'll let him speak for himself. Just seemed like a snarky way to state another point.
- jedidotflow aime ceci
#14
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 01:51
#15
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 02:22
I agree and have said so in a "what's your favorite weapon" post. Two handed weapons in Dragon Age: Inquisition are ridiculously proportioned. But from practical experience, it's the weapon, not the elf size or build.
But it's a fantasy game and that means one gets to accept a certain amount of unrealistic content.
#16
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 02:26
The Iron Bull wouldn't realistically be able to use some of those greatswords/greataxes in battle. Pretty sure none of the races would be able to do a backflip 5 feet into the air and somehow shoot 200 arrows from one bow at once. It's not supposed to be realistic.
#17
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 02:27
Stop breaking my immersion!
- Inverse_Twilight, correctamundo et MarcusAurelius aiment ceci
#18
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 02:35
They're waaaaay too tiny. Come on now.
Why would you even use a greatsword in non-formation combat? They were designed to break apart spear formations, then be discarded for ACTUAL weapons.
- Darkly Tranquil, Cobra's_back et QueenCrow aiment ceci
#19
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 02:37
Why would you even use a greatsword in non-formation combat? They were designed to break apart spear formations, then be discarded for ACTUAL weapons.
True.
But they're also sexy. That's why it's common in fantasy. I can't knock it.
#20
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 02:45
Why would you even use a greatsword in non-formation combat? They were designed to break apart spear formations, then be discarded for ACTUAL weapons.
Good point. I think it's the same kind of liberties taken as pairing one-handed sword and shield with plate armor.
#21
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 02:55
I'm okay with the swords, but the mauls. Come on. They seem ridic to me.
- Former_Fiend aime ceci
#22
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 03:05
Chimpanzees are four times as strong as humans, pound for pound, are smaller, and can kick the crap out of humans.
TL:DR (can I do that for one sentence??): Size isn't everything! That's not what she said...
#23
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 03:21
Chimpanzees are four times as strong as humans, pound for pound, are smaller, and can kick the crap out of humans.
TL:DR (can I do that for one sentence??): Size isn't everything! That's not what she said...
The four times thing is outdated apparently. They say two times now.
"They". I'm lazy. Sorry for not bothering linking studies atm. ![]()
Either way, their musculature is still apparent and very dense. Elves don't have that resemblance.
#24
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 03:23
I wasn't trying to draw an exact comparison between elves and chimps, though. I was just pointing out that just because they -look- skinny and weaker compared to humans doesn't mean that they are, in fact, weaker (though obviously they are skinnier) than humans.
In fact, I rather like that they don't just look like slightly reduced in size humans.
#25
Posté 23 octobre 2015 - 03:27





Retour en haut







