Hey all. On my walk to work today I was reflecting about Grey Wardens in general, and something dawned on me.
Warning: Lots of text and theorizing inbound.
Solas is clearly against the Grey Wardens as an organization. He greatly favors the exiling of them by the Inquisition. Yet something about Solas' distrust/hate for the Wardens has always bothered me--Solas claims that the Wardens are too reckless and irresponsible. That they take risks and perform actions that cause massive devastation for a purpose they believe to be "serving the greater good."
Yet Solas does this himself. Two examples (creation of the Veil, creation of the Breach) of Solas' history show him taking an incredibly similar approach to his actions and both having catastrophic effects. What's similar about Solas' actions is that he deems his actions must been done, for the greater good of his cause and the world.
Yet the Wardens claim the same. And yet Solas bashes on them in an almost hypocritical sense.
We know Solas believes in extreme actions to get a desired result. He truly believes in the end justifying the means. He expresses that in his Trespasser dialogue:
"I did not wage war against immortal God-Kings without getting my hands bloody"
"I am not Corypheus, I take no joy in what I must do. But the return of my people means the end of yours."
Solas also shows approval of such radical action during a dialogue with Iron Bull, in a situation where Bull sacrificed the Chargers.
Iron Bull: The chargers died for the mission, to secure the alliance. They died as heroes.
Solas: I was not doubting/questioning that.
Solas is upset with Bull not because of the outcome, but because Bull did it for the wrong reasons, that reason being unwavering loyalty to the Qun.
So then, why does Solas hate the Wardens when he himself approves of and takes such radical actions to support his cause, just as the Wardens do?
My realization: Solas' hatred of the Wardens is another case of Solas "fixing" his mistakes. Solas admits that he led Corypheus to his orb, allowing him and his Venatori to locate and unlock its power. We find out that Corypheus had also seized control of the Wardens, before the explosion at Haven. Solas must've known about this, and yet he saw the Wardens as just another tool for Corypheus, to perish alongside with him. Corypheus survives, and thus is able to continue commanding Wardens. This is why Solas has this irrational, personal disdain for the Wardens. They were pawns in his plan, and his plan failed. The Warden's corruption is another one of Solas' failure, and he is intent on destroying them and rectifying his "mistakes."
This explains why Solas has an unjust hatred for the Wardens. The issue is with not with the organization itself, as Solas is quite radical and reckless himself, but a personal issue.
And another thing: Solas may have shared a clue as to what "immortality" truly is. In trespasser he reveals the Elves were once immortal, and it was due to their conscious/natural connection to the Fade, as it was part of Thedas once. Once the veil separated the Fade and Thedas, Elves lost their immortality. Yet Corypheus has discovered it;
"I did not foresee a Tevinter Magister discovering the means of effective immortality."
But we find out how exactly Corypheus is immortal. Whenever he is killed, his spirit essence transfers to any blighted creature: darkspawn, Warden, or otherwise. This includes his dragon, and though it is never mentioned, he probably could've transferred his soul into any Red Templar, as they are now blighted beings.
So "effective immortality" must mean: transferring your essence into a kindred vessel. A vessel who shares a commonality of sort. We learned how Mythal was killed and she transferred her essence to Flemeth, who was human first.
So does that explain how Elves were immortal? When they were killed, they would transfer their souls to a spirit (remember, the Fade and Thedas were connected at this time) and that spirit would become a reincarnation of sorts of the Elf?





Retour en haut







