I question that as a genuine attempt at a reasonable compromise.
The compromise seems largely one-sided as Sera will have to agree to concede to consider the possiblity of other deities but the Inquisitor will have to agree to concede that the closet evidence they have to the existence of their deities and some actual evidence of some of their ancient culture is, in fact, a complete and utter lie.
Sera has to consider the possibility that other deities exist leaving her the option that comes with consideration; namely, considering it false but the Inquisitor has to accept without question that everything connected to the Temple is a lie which could, by the logic of that declaration, include their own deities.
With all due respect, it sounds a bit like the compromise you hear from a person being petty about something and wanting to mock the other person under the poor guise of posing a reasonable compromise; "Here's the compromise; I'll concede that mayyybe you are right, you'll concede that you are absolutely wrong in every way."
A fairer compromise would be that both Sera and the Inquisitor has to consider the others' viewpoints; Sera has to consider that there may be something about ancient elves and their culture to be found in the Temple that should not be idly dismissed because of religious reasons or fear and the Inquisitor has to consider that there may be some questionable things in the Temple that should not be accepted without question because the Inquisitor could be wrong in their initial assumptions about them.
Neither of them needs to consider anything. They can just accept that they'll never agree on this and drop the subject.
The Inquisitor never tries to convince Sera of anything. S/He merely answers the question that the latter brought up in the first place.





Retour en haut







