None of them are rock climbers, sprinters, distance runners, martial artists, gymnasts, acrobats, etc. Those "accoutrements" literally impinge/hinder athletic physical function, just like a beer gut on a guy wrecks their athletic abilities.
High athleticism is contrary to body fat. Boobs are fat, the higher your athleticism/conditioning level, the smaller your breasts must get (same with fat butt). It's ONE of the benefits of exercize and one of its intended outcomes.
What you will never see: big boobed, big butt women passing Ranger school. http://www.military....er-school.html Not a single one of them big boobed, big butted. The only two that made it through are also not built such because they'd never have made it through even the first phase. The women that even TRIED to get in were in the top shape of their lives, not curvy pin-up girls. Athletic and very lean. Here's another example of what females can even handle the entrance requirements: http://www.military....r-school.html Note to the unknowing: MOST special forces guys are not big Vega-style muscle men. Even THAT tends to be more hindrance to the physical requirements of Special Forces. The guys tend towards lean wiry functional muscle because the activities favor that sort of strength rather than raw strength. Being able to bench 300-400 lbs isn't something that gives a guy any advantage at all in Special Forces training. The opposite, in fact.
I've spent more years in the gym than most of ya'll have been alive and I never ever have seen the curvy pin-up excelling in: yoga, pilates, weight lifting, wall climbing, functional gym activities, running, aerobics, etc. The largest of them are bigger than average for women in muscle, not fat, not boob, not butt.
Serena Williams. There are so many more as well.





Retour en haut






