And I don't really see how Leviathans fit in as part of the problem without Catalyst being in there too. If Leviathans are part of the problem because they created an AI to solve their problems then Catalyst is part of the problem too. It can't arbitrate this matter objectively, so at the very least it should've created other AI that would've come up with the solution, or destroyed itself along with the leviathans.
Catalyst's reasoning also borders on autistic, I.E. It's so consumed with its own task that it fails to notice everything else around, going totally wrong, and makes hilariously stupid comments like: "Reapers aren't interested in conflict", "Would you call that war" If these statements are sincere they're beyond stupid. First of all, they don't seem hell bent on avoiding the conflict either. Second, you're ignoring(if insincere)/failing to comprehend(if autistic) the fact that despite what you're interested in, you are in conflict. A conflict which involves using weapons and military strength to achieve your your operational goals, which by definition is THE WAR. And it has literally zero likeness/parallels with chemical reaction that takes place when something is oxidated.
First of all, sorry it took me so long to answer.
How was the Catalyst part of the problem as well? The Catalyst did not turn on the Leviathans, even if that was what they called it.
And the Leviathans admit it still serves its purpose. If it would’ve just destroyed itself alongside Leviathan, who would've taken care of the problem then? No one. Which was Leviathans’ desire in the first place, they wanted someone to take care of this problem, and they chose an AI in order to do so. It is tied to this goal, tied to its programming to find a solution. And while obviously Leviathans didn't want to almost be wiped out, they still acknowledge their creation.
It was designed with a specific goal in mind, why would it want to destroy itself? That wouldn't have achieved the goal it tries to achieve.
Yeah, sure you can say by definition it is conflict, by our standards, but the Catalyst states they're not interested in the conflict itself, but rather the outcome, the harvesting, the preserving. So technically it is correct, Reapers are not interested in this conflict that is being created in order to achieve their goals, instead they just use any method, no matter how cruel, to reach their goal.
Leviathan backs this: There is no war, only the harvest.
You see, that's the whole problem in your thought process, you can't approve of something if you don't fully understand it and appreciate the ramifications of it. You can't say, "Hey, I approve of splitting the atom" without being fully aware what it means and what the consequences would be(Well, you could but you'd look extremely stupid). You could fairly reasonably say, that you like the idea the way you understand it. But to approve of something you need the full understanding of it. Which both Geth and the Reapers (as well as any other synthetics/AI) are lacking. Heretics approved of Sovereign's actions, would they still if they knew it would destroy them at the end of the cycle? Even if it were so they only approved of it because Sovereign's plans coincided with their goals. Do you think their reaction would've been the same if it was trying to turn Geth into organics/something they didn't wish to become in the first place? Imagine it this way: You have a dog. Dogs love walks. One day you pick up the leash and say "Here boy, let's go for a walk!" at the moment the dog can't be any happier and obviously it approves of the action you're taking. But what the dog doesn't know is, that the walk ends at the Vet's and with his balls in a plastic bag, or god forbid, if you're one of those guys with him being "put down, because he's in too much pain". Do you think dog would still be happy about the walk?
You also failed to address the fact that Catalyst at the end of every cycle sends Reapers into deadly conflict, where quite a few of them die, thus forever losing all the "accumulated knowledge and the essence of the race" that was "stored" in whatever poor bastard was unfortunate enough to come across that cycle's Shepard. Seems a bit off mandate to me. Couldn't Catalyst store all that essency-knowledgy-goodness on it's own hard drive, or at least somewhere safe?
So you mean because of how the outcome is, in hindsight they shouldn't have approved of Sovereign's actions before being destroyed, or the dog shouldn't have enjoyed the walk before it ended up at the vet? Well by then it's too late. They already did approve of Sovereign's actions and the dog already did enjoy the walk, it's created from being in this very moment. No one can look into the future, and if you approve of actions or enjoy them in the moment but regret them later, it doesn't mean that you simply stopped approving or being happy during these particular events in hindsight. (Am I even making sense, haha.)
I'm not entirely sure how your argument fits in anyway. I said that the geth do understand the Reapers in so far as the geth aspire the outcome of being united, ascended for themselves. If the Reapers were to do something to the geth against their will, I guess no, the geth would not approve, but this is a hypothetical example anyway, because it didn't show us this instance in the game. We don't have an example of Reapers turning geth into something they didn't want to become.
I'm not quite sure it is completely lost. I don't remember anything about this in the game now (maybe there's a dialogue or codex entry?), but the Catalyst might have very well stored each Reapers' "organic database" within its own. I think, from how it seems to work in one of the ME books, the knowledge the Reapers gather along the way, wherever they are, will be transferred to other Reapers as well and that would mean to the Catalyst, since it embodies the collective consciousness.
Doesn't matter what Catalyst tried beforehand. The fact still is that it is still ignoring the much more obvious and efficient ways of dealing with the process. Such as: creating shackles for the AIs, imprinting the "three laws of the robotics" in the core programming of every AI, harvesting synthetic life forms (i.e. the ones causing the destruction of the organic life) instead of organics, troubleshooting its own solution, trying to find flaw in its own programming. But no, from the get-go the arrogant brat is sure that there's nothing wrong with it. First of all, you know the definition of crazy right? Keep doing the same thing over and over, and expecting it to come out different? Maybe, just maybe the very thing that's causing these same results over countless cycles is the common denominator? You know, the catalyst's intricately laid out plan to coerce all organic life into the same beaten path of development. Or maybe Catalyst's "The created will always rebel against the creators" doctrine isn't set in stone. You don't see the Harbinger and gang revolting any time soon do you? It only works with organics you say. Huh... interesting isn't it... What's so special about you? Why don't You create AIs that will take care of the organics, you know the way you created the keepers to take care of the Citadel?
You know, I think there's probably no point in arguing any further about what it possibly did or didn't do, or what anyone else would do. Everyone sees different solutions as optimal. Your solution might be the best for you, maybe some others, but surely it would have some opposing parties as well, that's how it always is. People are diverse and not everyone will form the same opinion as you, so what makes your solution better than the Catalyst's ultimately? There is no real answer to that because it's not possible to reach an absolute truth with this. Some people will agree with you, yet others won't, or even say they themselves can come up with a better solution than yours.
It's always easy to judge something when you haven't actually been around during that time, when you don't even know what it was like or what and how it was tried.
Personally, I don't know what it tried, and while there might be better solutions, I wouldn't even know if they would work out, so there's that. All I care about in the end is to get rid of it and I'm glad I can do so.
See, now that's just being lazy of you. It spells "I can't come up with arguments to counter yours so I'll delegate it to supposed superior intellect, that's arbitrarily smarter than you. You can't argue with that." Well actually the whole point of this thread is to call the alleged superior intelligence of Catalyst into question. Just because it claims to be superior doesn't actually make it so. And just because it says that this is the most efficient way doesn't negate the fact that the ways I have listed above, or the ways which anyone with average intellect can come up with after half an hour of deliberation are actually more efficient methods of dealing with the problem. Failure on Catalyst's part is either in not seeing these methods(in this case it's inadequate for the task at hand and shouldn't be trusted to solve such matters), or deliberately passing them over (in this case it's a rogue AI, and needs to be shut down and have its HDD formatted right away).
Well I'm sorry, but it's just not stated in the game what exactly the Catalyst tried, only THAT it tried, how exactly does this make me lazy? Or demonstrate supposed superior intellect? You've lost me there.
And actually, yesterday I stumbled upon an interesting (quite longish
) post here that almost perfectly covers what I think about the Catalyst, and why I don't think of it as a mad AI. Just expressed so much better. Leaving that here, in case you're interested to see a really detailed analysis about all this.