You know, I'm not sure that threatening to kill random hunters whose only crime was to take the wrong path constitutes benevolence. When you threaten them with death, most people become rather defensive. There's a fight or flight response involved. Most people are going to try to get away, yeah, but they're likely to put a hand on a weapon out of reflex. It sounds more like provoking a fight than anything else. If they really wanted the hunters to leave them alone, they'd say "Hey, leave us alone and we'll return the favor." Not "We have six arrows pointed at your head."
The hunters Mahariel encounters aren't up to anything sinister. They aren't spying for a lord or doing anything that harms the Dalish in any way. They don't lead with threats. Yeah, they probably would avoid Dalish camps intentionally if they knew where they were, but all the humans know is that sometimes, hunters go out and they don't come back. That could be anything: torn apart by wolves, fell in a bear trap, pinned under a falling tree, used for target practice by Dalish, what have you. The point is, they don't realize the Dalish are even there.
Anyway, it seems to me that the best way to end the violence is to punish crimes that are actually committed, not strike preemptively. On both sides.
Me, I always get Josie to force the mourning halla on the village of Red Crossing instead of selling the scroll to the Chantry. This forces both sides to admit blame, but I think it's the only way to move past the sense of perpetual indignation and take a few steps toward healing.





Retour en haut






