Either its all ok or none of it is.
Stealing $1 is the same as stealing $1,000,000.
You don't measure morality.
So should all crimes have a death penalty? Even your example is silly. Here in the US, stealing $1 would be a misdemeanor while stealing $1,000,000 would be a felony.
I just see no difference between imprisoning Manning and imprisoning a soviet whistle blower.
Nor do I see a diff between soviet executions and the Rosenbergs or Tokyo Rose.
The only actual diff is the ideology it was done in the name of.
Do you see a difference between executing someone for what they know vs what they did? Do you know the difference between a traitor and a spy?
Tokyo Rose was a generic name for Japanese propagandists. If you're referring to Iva Toguri, she wasn't executed.
Chelsea Manning. And this is getting increasingly off topic.
Don't start that. I don't know if it actually happened, but there was talk of them using "Bradley Manning committed the crimes, but this is Chelsey Manning, a different person," as a defense.
And if the (speculative) protagonist name were a reference to Armstrong, Collins or Aldrin (oh look, more white males!), that might actually be relevant.
It was relevant to what I quoted.