What's the problem with that?
I mean when people go I wonder if Archi is a magister I also cry inside , it reminds me of the people who were sure Cory was dead and there was nothing weird with Larius , just people seeings "things".
At this point we have a dev saying Cori and Archi are the same.
Those two sharing a model as unique darkspawn.
HUGE hints in WOT2.
And here we go again people go"mmmm nope , I'm still really not sure .It proves nothing"
The problem is when the fans consider an interpretation of a collection of statements to lead to only possible conclusion and then force that conclusion down the fanbase's throat as the truth.
FACT
The Architect is an ancient darkspawn with no memory of how he was born.
In the work where he is originally depicted for the first time in the lore (The Calling), he looks like a common Emissary, rather than looking human.
Later, Wonders of Thedas introduces the notion that he has some mysterious connection to the corruption of the Golden City.
FAN THEORY
The Architect is a magister because 1) His basic appearance IN GAME is similar to Corypheus. 2) He looks human IN GAME. 3) He found Urthemiel. 4) One of the Magisters was called the Architect of Beauty.
First, he DOESN'T look human in his original design. Second, the term Golden City is used by the Chantry when referring to the Black City. Remember Corypheus makes it clear they already found the city to be black and corrupt when they entered the Fade. Whether this was the Architect's doing, we have no way of knowing.
What we have are contradictory facts, not a solid theory. If the Architect had been depicted in the game as he is shown in the book - an ordinary emissary -, people would never associate him with a Magister.
So here's a SECOND theory about his true identity, just to show how the fans can make ANY sort of deduction from what BW has revealed so far:
The Architect of Beauty was trapped in the Black City for centuries until his conscience reached an emissary in the Fade through the taint. The creature's conscience was then awakened, which explains why the Architect has no recollection of how he was born.
He then tried to communicate with the creature, much like an Archdemon does, but failed. All it remembered was a name: Architect. Thus the emissary took his identity for his own and tried to find a way to free his people, just like he was freed.
Completely plausible and explains the MAJOR difference between Corypheus and the Architect: one remembers who he is because he's a Magister. The other doesn't because he's always been a darkspawn.
Now prove my theory wrong.