You metal gear fans are polishing brass on the titanic! Game wasn't good since the release of the ps3
Please stop, trolling is not your forte.
Just a thought - ME:A will be running on the same engine as SW: Battlefront
The engine can certainly cope with Battlefront ... even if you start with lunacy like the Toddyhancer mod (if it's ever finished):
http://www.pcgamer.c...k-like-a-movie/
There's no reason ME:A shouldn't look great.
Good.Now Let's hope we don't get day 1 dlc.
You metal gear fans are polishing brass on the titanic! Game wasn't good since the release of the ps3
Please stop, trolling is not your forte.
Just a thought - ME:A will be running on the same engine as SW: Battlefront
The engine can certainly cope with Battlefront ... even if you start with lunacy like the Toddyhancer mod (if it's ever finished):
http://www.pcgamer.c...k-like-a-movie/
There's no reason ME:A shouldn't look great.
Good.Now Let's hope we don't get day 1 dlc.
I hope Bioware and EA take notes from Fallout 4 and optimise the game properly. I like Fallout4 but it's kind of a joke at the same time, it didn't support sli when it first came out, the frame rate was locked, objects were stuttering, it butchers your cpu, you had to bring out a note pad just to turn off mouse acceleration. There are so many problems with the game.
So it's your typical Bethesda product.
So it's your typical Bethesda product.
Skyrim wasn't that bad was it?
Skyrim wasn't that bad was it?
Bethesda games in general are notoriously buggy at launch, and Skyrim wasn't an exception =P
Skyrim wasn't that bad was it?
Yeah, I had all sorts of frame rate/lag issues. With a pretty stout PC at the time.
For all the people saying "Frostbite", while the engine may be capable of handling good graphics and not murder most PCs and have a nice lightning engine
Stuff like polygon count and texture resolution are on the developer to actually make good. Simply having a good engine doesn't automatically mean it's going to look good.
True - but what I said was that Frostbite was capable enough ... not whether BioWare were or not 
Bethesda games in general are notoriously buggy at launch, and Skyrim wasn't an exception =P
Skyrim was considerably less buggy than either Fallout 3 or Oblivion, and Fallout 4 was even less buggy than Skyrim, so they're making progress in that department. Still, they need to give up their sh!tty Gamebryo engine, it's seriously 95% of the problem.
Fallout 4 is incredibly popular right now but the graphics are barely considered current gen, if graphics mattered this would not be the case.
A lot of people think that the main reason why Fallout 4 is so popular is because of the mods and supposedly that Bethesda made a deal with Microsoft to allow mods to be downloaded and used on Xbox One.
Skyrim was considerably less buggy than either Fallout 3 or Oblivion, and Fallout 4 was even less buggy than Skyrim, so they're making progress in that department. Still, they need to give up their sh!tty Gamebryo engine, it's seriously 95% of the problem.
Frostbite is one of the best looking engines on the market. I'm not worried about graphics.
Inquisition used the Frostbite engine and the graphics were... passable at best.
What the engine is capable of and what the devs are capable of aren't always one and the same.
Inquisition used the Frostbite engine and the graphics were... passable at best.
What the engine is capable of and what the devs are capable of aren't always one and the same.
But how are sales on consoles?A lot of people think that the main reason why Fallout 4 is so popular is because of the mods and supposedly that Bethesda made a deal with Microsoft to allow mods to be downloaded and used on Xbox One.
Inquisition used the Frostbite engine and the graphics were... passable at best.
What the engine is capable of and what the devs are capable of aren't always one and the same.
Yeah, it's hard for me to understand how Battlefront 3 and Inquisition do use the same engine but look so different fidelity wise.
I mean, let's be honest, DAI was quite underwhelming and Battlefront is prolly one of the best looking games at the moment.
Let's just hope DAI wasn't the best Bioware can do with Frostbite and the shift from UE to Frostbite had some impact on the end results in DAI. It's hard enough for any SF game these days to be compared to the High End PC only game Star Citizen, it should at least it look as good as possible within the limited next-gen-console-port-limits of today.
Mass Effect 1 wasn't a pretty game. I mean if I had to rate the graphics, I'd say 6.5-7. Mass Effect 2 and 3 I'd say 8. However, I could care less. I don't care about how it looks, more so how it plays.
Mass Effect 1 wasn't a pretty game. I mean if I had to rate the graphics, I'd say 6.5-7. Mass Effect 2 and 3 I'd say 8. However, I could care less. I don't care about how it looks, more so how it plays.
ME1 is my least favourite game but I enjoyed exploring planets on that game with the mako.
But how are sales on consoles?
Mass Effect 1 wasn't a pretty game. I mean if I had to rate the graphics, I'd say 6.5-7. Mass Effect 2 and 3 I'd say 8. However, I could care less. I don't care about how it looks, more so how it plays.
I played ME1 a few months back and I didn't notice bad graphics. Benefit of being somewhat stylized is super photo realism isn't required.
I dunno. All things considered, I think ME1's aged considerably well compared to its medieval counterpart Dragon Age: Origins.
Mass Effect 1 has really lovely art design. DAO emphatically does not. There's the difference.
Mass Effect 1 has really lovely art design. DAO emphatically does not. There's the difference.
Oh definitely, I think that makes all the difference really, I enjoy some artistic designs from the late 70s and think they hold better then some of the more modern takes on given subjects. A solid art design can make all the difference even when the presentation is not up to par for modernity.
o.o
I mean that came out in the seventies and I'd argue that it has some of the better hand drawn art design and animation stills of its era and its still comparable today almost forty years later.
Inquisition used the Frostbite engine and the graphics were... passable at best.
What the engine is capable of and what the devs are capable of aren't always one and the same.
DAI was limited by being on last gen consoles as well though, right? Plus afaik, ME is Bioware's more popular series. So I imagine its graphics will be superior.
I can't lie that fox engine is impressive 
Inquisition used the Frostbite engine and the graphics were... passable at best.
What the engine is capable of and what the devs are capable of aren't always one and the same.
I don't know what people expect really, I played DA:I on PS4 and thought the graphics were great.. i'm not a graphic expert but I feel its unfair to DA:I to that the graphics were any less than great, sure every RPG and all games really have polish issues and stuff like that, but I never thought that DA:I look wise were ''passable'' thanks a random opinion of course, mine lol 
Retour en haut