Ignoring that any kind of incest implication in regards to the Lawson story is probably not part of the writer's intentions,
the reaction to mentions of incest in media, be it games / books / other, is actually very interesting in general.
It's very similar to the weird artificial dichotomy in some people's mind when it comes to the depiction of violence Vs. sexual acts in video games (or other media).
I'll quote G.R.R. Martin on this:
"I can describe an axe entering a human skull in great explicit detail and no one will blink twice at it. I provide a similar description, just as detailed, of a penis entering a vagina, and I get letters about it and people swearing off. To my mind this is kind of frustrating, it's madness. Ultimately, in the history of [the] world, penises entering vaginas have given a lot of people a lot of pleasure. Axes entering skulls, well, not so much."
Now with incest, it seems that there is a similar attitude, even among the self proclaimed "open-minded" groups that support any other obscure sexuality type or desire, like incest is too much...
Personally, I'm not particularly intrigued by the idea of incest on its own merit, but it does tend to be a rather rare element that has the potential to wake you up startled in the middle of an otherwise yawn-worthy generic story that you have experienced before multiple times.
Axes entering skulls and porn aren't all that necessary to me, alike. ![]()
The acts themselves are very necessary... at least most of the time.





Retour en haut










