Twisted theory on Fiona
#1
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 07:23
#2
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 07:44
But why would they give it to Fiona?
#3
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 08:29
But why would they give it to Fiona?
This. Plus, Fiona was shunned by the Wardens and forced to leave. I doibt they'd cure her just to shun her. Personally, I think it was just that Tavinter Amulet, with magic gone wrong which cured her.
- Hanako Ikezawa et ThePhoenixKing aiment ceci
#4
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 08:34
It could just have had to do with the whole pregnancy thing. Perhaps her body purged the taint in an effort to safeguard the fetus. Of course, since she was a Warden she would have had a difficult come conceiving anyway, so perhaps the Theirin blood helped with that.
#6
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:09
Because i don't think that the Architect did something to her, even by accident.I'm not sure why people have a hard time accepting that the Architect cured her by accident.
The blood of the Theirin is too much of a far fetched theory...
I think that the wardens of the Anderfel did something to her.
#7
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:11
Because she was in love with the king of a nation and they probably wanted to gain some advantage from this situation and from their child.But why would they give it to Fiona?
#8
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:11
I agree with the theory that conceiving a fusgorah kid cleansed her.
#10
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:15
Because she was in love with the king of a nation and they probably wanted to gain some advantage from this situation and from their child.
Did they know that she was in love with Maric?
Regardless, she is a mage and an elf. Any advantage a match with a foreign king could get them would be lost then.
#11
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:18
It doesn't seem to be a bad idea to seduce the king of the same nation that exiled them with a Gw lover in order to try to rebuild the order in Ferelden....how does curing her and kicking her out give them an advantage?
If the cure they gave to her allowed her to give birth more easly?
#12
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:21
It doesn't seem to be a bad idea to seduce the king of the same nation that exiled them with a Gw lover in order to try to rebuild the order in Ferelden.
If the cure they gave to her allowed her to give birth more easly?
Except she wasn't a Grey Warden. After she was cured of the taint, she was kicked out of the order.
The Grey Wardens gain nothing by curing Fiona of the taint.
#13
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:26
It doesn't seem to be a bad idea to seduce the king of the same nation that exiled them with a Gw lover in order to try to rebuild the order in Ferelden.
If the cure they gave to her allowed her to give birth more easly?
Except they didn't need to kick her out for that. They were already lovers. Kicking out the kings lover probably isn't going to make either of them happy. This only hurts their cause.
There's nothing to suggest it would help with the birth. Gray Wardens aren't even supposed to be able to become pregnant, so it suggests that whatever happened, happened before this point.
- Hanako Ikezawa aime ceci
#14
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:33
It they knew about her pregnacy and gave her the cure to allow her to gave birth to the child more easly even if they had personally nothing to gain in the matter.Except she wasn't a Grey Warden. After she was cured of the taint, she was kicked out of the order.
The Grey Wardens gain nothing by curing Fiona of the taint.
There could be plenty of reasons, but i don't think she was cured by accident or luck.
I seriously doubt that after all this time the GW are around they don't have already the cure in their hands.
#15
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:37
Could a warden fake it? Can one warden tell that others are not real wardens? Perhaps she never was a warden but just hung out with the wardens enough that they assumed she was one?
(I of course am not thinking clearly and am just rambling becasue I can't remember all that much about Fionas story life in it's entirety .)
#16
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:40
Fiona said why the wardens kick her out, it was because many members of the order didn't like the fact that she was the only one free of the burden of the taint.Except they didn't need to kick her out for that. They were already lovers.
I'm not saying that all the GW of Anderfel have the cure, but i believe that some of them (Chamberlain, First warden ) has it and they have no interest in sharing it with everyone, but maybe for one reason or the other they decided to give it to Fiona.
#17
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:41
It they knew about her pregnacy and gave her the cure to allow her to gave birth to the child more easly even if they had personally nothing to gain in the matter.
There could be plenty of reasons, but i don't think she was cured by accident or luck.
I seriously doubt that after all this time the GW are around they don't have already the cure in their hands.
Wardens slaughter entire towns of people, including children and babies, to protect people from the blight. I doubt they will get all sentimental about one baby now.
#18
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 10:50
But that baby was a royal bastard one....and even if it wasn't for any political interest not every GW have to think like that.Wardens slaughter entire towns of people, including children and babies, to protect people from the blight. I doubt they will get all sentimental about one baby now.
#19
Posté 21 janvier 2016 - 11:39
Fiona was cured of the blight to total immunity. After her pregnancy, she was forced thru the Joining again, but it failed. Hence, she was kicked from the order.
Baby Alistair had nothing to do with her being kicked out (She tells you this in Skyhold).
- Hanako Ikezawa aime ceci
#20
Posté 22 janvier 2016 - 12:33
^ this, according to her she cannot be tainted now. Still curious how in the dark future she was being eaten alive by red lyrium.
#21
Posté 22 janvier 2016 - 02:37
^ this, according to her she cannot be tainted now. Still curious how in the dark future she was being eaten alive by red lyrium.
Because Corypheus commands the blight in the same way the Arcitect does?
If the Arcitect can accidentally undo someone's taint and make them immune then it wouldn't be much of a stretch to suggest that Cory could intentionally reverse it.
#22
Posté 22 janvier 2016 - 02:17
Fiona was cured of the blight to total immunity. After her pregnancy, she was forced thru the Joining again, but it failed. Hence, she was kicked from the order.
Baby Alistair had nothing to do with her being kicked out (She tells you this in Skyhold).
This is way i believe that she was not cured by accident,because she not only was cured from the taint but now is even immune to the joining.
I don't trust the GW and i beleive that some of their members already have a means to remove the effect of the joining..
#23
Posté 22 janvier 2016 - 02:58
It wouldn't make sense for them to have those means and not use them. They could literally recruit half of Thedas during blights and then cure them again after. It wouldn't make sense for them to have that option and not use it.
- ThePhoenixKing et Rinshikai10 aiment ceci
#24
Posté 22 janvier 2016 - 04:43
It wouldn't make sense for them to have those means and not use them. They could literally recruit half of Thedas during blights and then cure them again after. It wouldn't make sense for them to have that option and not use it.
#25
Posté 22 janvier 2016 - 05:26
The joining is potentially lethal so there is always the risk but that's not even the point,after one get cured the same way Fiona did is apparently unable to do the joining againg.The GW don't just want ot save world from the blights they want the monopoly over it,and what better way to have your army forever at disposal until death?
A case study of one single subject is barely anything to hold a theory up for. If the Grey Wardens just wanted a big effective army then they would simply use blood magic. I think you just have to face that your "theory" presently is very bad.
- TK514 aime ceci





Retour en haut







