Congrats, you just described the hanar. You know the race that evacuated tens of thousands of drell to their homeworld?
Waitaminute...

The Leviathans enthrall other races to do everything for them. They're parasites that can't even touch their flappers together. How the hell could they make machines? The Hanar were lucky enough to live on a planet lousy with Prothean tech. They didn't make anything either. Their tentacle arms can't even lift more than 100 grams or something.
I said we don't know what it's original purpose was. It may have started as something other than a weapon (the Catalyst even says it's little more than a power source) which got repurposed. Or maybe it was always a weapon and its focus has been changed. We simply don't know, because "there is no time to explain"
Right, you said we don't know what the original purpose of it was. Then you went on to say it was meant to be a way for every cycle to symbolically strike back against the Reapers, which would mean it's purpose was always as a weapon against the Reapers. You can't have it both ways.
Off by about 1300 years. And I have no idea what point you're trying to make is
Baghdad Battery. Educate yourself. And you would know what I was talking about if your argument weren't intellectually dishonest.
Yes, the Reapers are stupid. But that's the writing. They're supposed to be smart.
But they aren't smart. They've never been smart during the course of the trilogy. What they're supposed to be doesn't matter one bit.
You also keep using the word "omniscient" and blaming me for using it. Stop it.Argue the topic at hand and stop making stuff up to argue.
There's that intellectual dishonesty.
Oh, and yes, the Catalyst has "thought of" Synthesis. But handwaved away why it couldn't work until Shepard donated his/her super-special "organic energy"
When? And you just destroyed your own argument. Clearly we're capable of doing things the Reapers are not. If the Reapers could anything we could do then they would have already accomplished synthesis.
Once again you are accrediting me with something I did not say.
I said "Anything our cycle could ever come up with is already well within the Reapers' capabilities"
And we've both already showed why that's a stupid argument.
Please do me the courtesy of quoting me rather than yourself when arguing what I said.
Do you want me to quote you admitting that our cycle is capable of doing things the Reapers are not?