230 réponses à ce sujet

[Al Foley]

THey also used the Rebel Alliance metaphor.  Much more appropriate for the Inquistion. 

[VorexRyder]

DA:O had a reliably self-contained plot with some hooks, DA:2 was a set-up building up towards three different conflicts that were unsatisfactorily resolved in Inquisition with little catharsis, and the mess of having both circle & college for mages in Trespasser as well the Exalted council itself retroactively rob what little agency your character had in the core game. It's one full game with two transition ones, not counting comics and books.

 

 

Black Mage: That's it, I've had enough. This whole goddamn adventure has been nothing but pointless build ups toward pay offs that never happen.

 

 

Great World, Cool Lore, Compelling Characters. But bad RPGs, when they retroactively make the previous games in the series worse.

[Almostfaceman]

For me, Inquisition was a fun but overall disappointing game, a 6 out of 10. It had some really interesting companions (Cole, Dorian, Iron Bull to name a few), cool locations, fun (though dumbed down) combat, and some relatively interesting main quests. However, the whole thing was bugged down by massive, empty areas, MMO like collection quests, dumbed down combat, bad loot system, some quests which where horribly written, and a 1960's batman main villain. So I'm always surprised when people tell me that Inquisition is a better game then Origins, which for me was a solid 9/10, 8/10 on a bad day, and one of my top games of all time. What I want to know is, why do you think that Inquisition was a superior game?

 

Edit: So my conclusion? We are completely different people. We seem to have completely different tastes to a degree I did not think possible. Things you find interesting I find impossibly boring and I thought what I thought was the norm. But it seems that even boring things hold the interest of some people, and interesting things seem boring to others.

 

I'm not going to debate who's right or wrong on this subject, because their probably isn't a right answer (unless you like DAII the most, in which case you are clearly wrong), and I'm disappointed that I will never get another Origins from Bioware, but I guess they are going after a different audience to their DAO fans, and I'll just have to find someone different.

 

Also Abyss108, you are a troll. You must be a Troll.

 

Edit 2: Though I will maintain that, if you think Loghain was a bad villain, you are wrong. Not subjectively wrong. Wrong.

 

So... you're one of those people standing on top of a hill daring someone to talk you down. 

 

[Jack007]

You ask for me, the most difficult question.

 

Because I love the whole series. All 3 of games.

 

Personally, I loved the second game most, with Hawke.

 

The music, specially when fighting, ....

The Story, ....

Fighting itself was so addictive ....

 

This will not say, that I don't like the other games.

Inquisition:

- loved using the trebouchet

- loved the music, going to Skyhold

 

In my eyes, all 3 are good.

 

But specially: Dragon Age 2

With: Kate Mulgrew and Morrigan

Fantastic

[DreamSever]

Never completed inquisition, DAO bout 12 times DA2 6 times. Cant get invested in this one, the character is bland compared to the other 2, the companions were better in the other 2, side quests were better in the other 2, this game never hooked me in, like the other 2, landscapes are barren and lifeless, war table misdions can take up to a day

[CoM Solaufein]

Definitely graphics wise. DAO has such fugly dated looking graphics that I can't even bring myself to play it any more. I tried to start another game in DAO because I wanted to put up a different character in Dragon Keep. But I didn't get far, can't stand DAO's inferior graphics.