Aller au contenu

Photo

Patrick Weekes Interview - Dragon Age, Iron Bull and Krem


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
194 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Capone666

Capone666
  • Members
  • 1 207 messages

We would be remiss if we didn’t talk about the varied, interesting romances in the world of gaming. Patrick Weekes, now lead writer for the Dragon Age franchise spoke with us a few months ago about how to effectively convey sexuality in gaming.

 

CLICK AND LISTEN! 

 

TRANSCRIPT THANKS TO COMMANDER LURKER

AB: When did you decide on Iron Bull’s ideology, I guess, on [his] sexuality?

 

PW: So we were looking at how the qun handled sexuality and we went back and forth about it. We had different ideas. There was the puritan version, there was the holy thing, there was the ‘he’s basically no different from any other mercenary’ option. We eventually kicked it around and said if we’re going to do this, if this is something he’s going to talk about, we better make it interesting, because if he’s not interested in sex in any capacity and if he’s buttoned down about it then he’s not really covering any ground that we didn’t already cover really really well with Sten. And if he’s basically a mercenary who likes sleeping with people, well we’ve also done that before with other characters, so this was a chance for something new.

 

Looking at how the qunari treat sex and what sex means for them and what is and isn't’ considered taboo, that was, in addition to just being goofy fun–which is certainly part of the reason we wrote him–it would be interesting to see, okay, here is a culture that is really in touch with their physical side and just completely removes the taboo on things. ‘Oh, okay this is what you need? Well, great, we’re gonna calm you down, we’re gonna have fun, alright, awesome, great, have a good day.’

 

AB: One of the amazing things though in the relationship with Iron Bull if you do kinda progress towards it, just like all of these great relationships–I think of Jack in Mass Effect–when you take a step deeper, you see that that relationship and this form of sexual identity can be a lot stronger.

 

When developing this sort of idea for his sexuality, did you look at or speak to any experts, any people that deal with BDSM or other things like this when trying to express this very complicated and often, I would say misunderstood form of sexual expression?

 

PW: Oh, it’s absolutely complicated and often misunderstood. And yes, I’m fortunate to have friends in the community that I could talk to and say, ‘okay, how does this work, how does this go?’

 

The original, if I’m remembering this right, was Mike Laidlaw, our creative director and lead designer, he and I at lunch, I said, ‘you know, I kinda would like to see if the Iron Bull could maybe be romanceable.’ and he went, ‘Really?’ and I went ‘yeah okay I know, but we got Cullen, we got all the quote ‘normal’ romances, we got those, but just imagine if he like, you know, leaned in and pinned your arms to the wall and said ‘[deep voice] are you ready to do this’, and Mike went ‘okay! You clearly have a vision.’ We were there with our wives, his wife Mel and my wife Karen and both of them went ‘Yes. Please. That. Do that thing you just described’. Okay! Apparently there’s a target audience for that! So we took it from that.

 

I took it to […] my friends in the community and said, ‘okay here’s what I’d like to do, I am aware that 50 Shades of Gray–it wasn’t a movie yet when we were writing it [Bull’s romance] but we knew the movie was coming, we knew the books had sold zillions and zillions of copies so there was obviously some market for something like this. And at the same time I had also seen criticism from people saying ‘here’s what 50 Shades did wrong, here’s the things that were not healthy about it’, so how can we do these things and get it done in a way that is tricker than in 50 Shades.

 

Because in 50 Shades you are a reader reading about what another character is doing. And it is okay if the other character does something in a way that causes them to be degraded or feel disrespected because you’re not that character. But in a video game, you ARE that character. ANYTHING along those lines that happens has to be so carefully managed in a way that, if we take power away from you we are doing so after you have said unequivocally ‘I want you to do this. I am happy that you are doing this. Please do the thing you have just telegraphed you are going to do.’

 

And so that was the reason why, relative to some of the other romance options, [with] Iron Bull […] you have to flirt with him–a lot–have no other romances open. And then […] he’s waiting in your bedroom saying ‘I’ve seen the signals, I’m not sure you know what you’re getting into.’ You have to say ‘Yes, I want to do this’ twice before he even touches you. And then after he touches you, you get a little hint of ‘oh this is going to be, OH this might not be reading love poetry by the river!’ Then you have another chance to say ‘oh, yeah, never mind. I wanted something else.’

 

And then, again, just like everything else, because making a video game of this sort, we are making something and our goal is to give the players the type of fantasy fulfillment they want. And no one wants a type of fantasy fulfilment where someone hits on them, they say, ‘no i’m not interested,’ and the other person gets angry and bitter. And brings it up later in passive aggressive ways, or stalks them or gets creepy on them. So if you’re like ‘Ok Iron Bull that could be fun, that could be interesting’ and then he pins your arms up over your head and you go ‘Nope! Not interested!’, he immediately backs off, goes ‘Hey, no worries, have a good one, talk to you later’ and leaves. Those were all things we hit really, really carefully.

 

The cinematic designer was John Epler and he’s an amazing guy, fantastic to work with, and he and I got real comfortable to the point of […]–we actually staged out the scene. He and I, in a room, going, ‘okay and then this happens, and we’ll have the camera here, okay, pin my arms here,’ […] And we’re laughing about it because you know, we’re a couple of dudes, but if you can’t get to the point where you can have that conversation with someone you’re working with about it, then how are you supposed to deliver that to the audience? I feel like our players can tell when we don’t actually believe or respect something that we’re making. There are times where I feel ‘wow that movie was phoned in’ or ‘wow that book was, that was someone writing that for a paycheck’ you know, so it was a little bit of interesting growth on all our parts to get to a point where we were comfortable with that.


  • BSpud aime ceci

#2
Dai Grepher

Dai Grepher
  • Members
  • 4 675 messages

Didn't BioFan interview Weekes recently? What ever happened to that?

 

Anyway, we already heard Weekes regarding the mentioned characters. I hope that argument doesn't come up again.

 

I don't think "mires" of people had a problem with those characters. I think Weekes was blowing it out of proportion to feel like a "trailblazer".


  • Neverwinter_Knight77, ThePhoenixKing, SharpWalkers et 1 autre aiment ceci

#3
fhs33721

fhs33721
  • Members
  • 1 250 messages

 

I don't think "mires" of people had a problem with those characters.

That's what I used to think. But then I opened the Internet.

Spoiler alert: It wasn't a pretty sight.


  • daveliam aime ceci

#4
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 631 messages
Hell, this board gets toxic from time to time. You know a thread's going down the tubes when somebody starts talking about catering to "SJWs" ruining Bio.
  • Dr. rotinaj et daveliam aiment ceci

#5
Abyss108

Abyss108
  • Members
  • 2 009 messages

I thought toxic was the default state for this place...  :mellow:


  • Barnzi88, fhs33721 et German Soldier aiment ceci

#6
LinksOcarina

LinksOcarina
  • Members
  • 6 534 messages

Didn't BioFan interview Weekes recently? Whatever happened to that?

 

Anyway, we already heard Weekes regarding the mentioned characters. I hope that argument doesn't come up again.

 

I don't think "mires" of people had a problem with those characters. I think Weekes was blowing it out of proportion to feel like a "trailblazer".

 

Yeah a lot of people have issues with Bull and Krem still...

 

Hell, the website I write for, any time Dragon Age comes up it's about their "progressive slant" and how poorly written Bull, Dorian and Krem are as being "token characters" for a "SJW" agenda.

 

You will never please everyone I guess.


  • daveliam aime ceci

#7
greenbrownblue

greenbrownblue
  • Members
  • 420 messages

We would be remiss if we didn’t talk about the varied, interesting romances in the world of gaming. Patrick Weekes, now lead writer for the Dragon Age franchise spoke with us a few months ago about how to effectively convey sexuality in gaming.

 

CLICK AND LISTEN! 

I do recommend waiting for Biofan's upload. He promised an interesting interview. Btw.... Why does this vid have so many dislikes :/// ?


  • almasy87 aime ceci

#8
greenbrownblue

greenbrownblue
  • Members
  • 420 messages

Yeah a lot of people have issues with Bull and Krem still...

 

Hell, the website I write for, any time Dragon Age comes up it's about their "progressive slant" and how poorly written Bull, Dorian and Krem are as being "token characters" for a "SJW" agenda.

 

You will never please everyone I guess.

Well, Iron Bull is not even half as well done as Solas, but it isnt that bad either. I liked him. Tho yeah... I see how Bio should stop forcing on players one sided conversations about sexual preferences



#9
rapscallioness

rapscallioness
  • Members
  • 8 039 messages

I do recommend waiting for Biofan's upload. He promised an interesting interview. Btw.... Why does this vid have so many dislikes :/// ?

 

Probably because they were talking about IB, Krem and sexuality...



#10
rapscallioness

rapscallioness
  • Members
  • 8 039 messages

Well, Iron Bull is not even half as well done as Solas, but it isnt that bad either. I liked him. Tho yeah... I see how Bio should stop forcing on players one sided conversations about sexual preferences

 

I thought IB was done just as well as Solas.



#11
Capone666

Capone666
  • Members
  • 1 207 messages

Well, Iron Bull is not even half as well done as Solas, but it isnt that bad either. I liked him. Tho yeah... I see how Bio should stop forcing on players one sided conversations about sexual preferences

 

haha - 

Isn't that you? 

TO be fair, we moved on from this a while ago...but I do love it when I can talk Bioware and Dragon Age. The entire interview is 3 hours long so as you all know, I've had to dole it out piece meal for my on air show. 

This is a short look- but still I think inspirational and has some new insights. 



#12
Dai Grepher

Dai Grepher
  • Members
  • 4 675 messages

Yeah a lot of people have issues with Bull and Krem still...

 

Hell, the website I write for, any time Dragon Age comes up it's about their "progressive slant" and how poorly written Bull, Dorian and Krem are as being "token characters" for a "SJW" agenda.

 

You will never please everyone I guess.

 

Sure, there are some. I just don't think it was widespread. Maybe like... 5% of the fanbase? I mean, we all know what Dragon Age is. Conservatives don't go into an M rated game that features sex and then complain about seeing what was advertised.

 

Also, most of those I saw who had issues with Bull, Dorian, and Krem were actually part of the LGBT crowd and didn't like that those characters were not written to their satisfaction.
 

Those complaining about SJWness, I think took issue that they did not have the opinion in-game to disagree, and also that Weekes basically told these fans to go play something else if they don't like not having the option to disagree.


  • Milana et SharpWalkers aiment ceci

#13
Neverwinter_Knight77

Neverwinter_Knight77
  • Members
  • 2 840 messages
Ehh I was hoping to read it here. Too lazy to click.

Edit: 3 hours, you say? Oh my.
  • Enigmatick aime ceci

#14
nightscrawl

nightscrawl
  • Members
  • 7 472 messages

Is there going to be a transcript like with your other interviews? I'm sorry, but I'm not too interested in listening to three hours of an interview.

 

Also... "The fallout of being awesome, and giving people real characters." I hope PW didn't actually phrase it that way. People have various, legitimate complaints about some of the Iron Bull and Krem stuff that is TOTALLY UNRELATED TO BIGOTRY. Not everyone from the LGBT community is going to look at such characters in the same way, nor are allies supposed to be 100% happy with such characters simply because they exist. Following with my transcript remark above, it's obvious I haven't listened to the interview, neither will I do so; I'll wait for a transcript and read that whenever it's provided. But if he continues to bang the bigotry drum without at least seriously addressing some of the other issues players have -- including LGBT players! -- then I really have no patience for such garbage.


  • Heimdall, vbibbi, ThePhoenixKing et 3 autres aiment ceci

#15
Midnight Bliss

Midnight Bliss
  • Members
  • 857 messages

It's so sad more people don't understand Hissrad. He was such a brilliantly written and wonderfully nuanced character and a real trailblazer in so many ways, if only people could dropped their preconceived ideas and opened themselves up to him, I think he would have been a far more popular character.

 

Such a shame we couldn't get rid of the waste of space companions Vivienne and Blackwall so he could have more story and characterization.

 

 

Oh, and Krem should have been a companion, - talk about a wasted opportunity. I think I'd be in Thedas heaven to have a party with my Inquis, Bull, Cass & Krem.❤

 

Well, Iron Bull is not even half as well done as Solas, but it isnt that bad either. I liked him. Tho yeah... I see how Bio should stop forcing on players one sided conversations about sexual preferences

Hissrad was every bit as well written as Solas, arguably better. ((I'm not going to Solas bash though since it's petty and alot of people enjoy him)) - He was one of the few shreds of true light in DAI's mess.



#16
Bayonet Hipshot

Bayonet Hipshot
  • Members
  • 6 768 messages

Well, Iron Bull is not even half as well done as Solas, but it isnt that bad either. I liked him. Tho yeah... I see how Bio should stop forcing on players one sided conversations about sexual preferences

 

I am not a big fan of Iron Bull. Firstly, he treats his sexual partners in a manner that I find disgusting. I do not like being dominated or being tied up, the sense of being powerless is a big turn off for me and I find people who do enjoy being the submissive wimp to be pathetic. Furthermore, the way he simply assumes all the potential Inquisitors who attempt to approach him for romance to want to be dominated and tied up because of "Ben-Hassrath training" takes away the agency of the player. I don't really find much depth to Iron Bull either. He is all about getting drunk, having sex and being with the Chargers. I expected more from his character, perhaps a look at how soldiers and spies deal with effects of PTSD, how they deal with cultural indoctrination, etc.

 

As for Krem, I see her as a lousy attempt to retcon and to portray the Qunari in some positive light, even though in DAO we have Sten (who later can become the Arishok) telling us that women cannot be warriors, but they can merely be priests and artisans. He says those words to everyone on the Warden team who are biologically female and he states this as though he was stating a common knowledge. As such, I find the idea that Krem, a biological female being accepted as a warrior among Qunari to be rather laughable just because she feels she is a male.

 

With regards to Bioware's one-sided conversations about sexuality in their games, it is obvious that they are, as a company, trying to tell you that this is how they think and that you are not allowed to challenge their views or debate it in an intellectually honest discussion. In essence, what is happening here is that Patrick Weekes is telling you, the player, this is what he thinks about sexuality and that you cannot question it or argue it in any way, because its "progressive".

 

This framing of one sided viewpoints on something as "progressive" is rather preposterous. Okay, you want to have a transgender character in game and you make them rather well known through marketing and interview. The sensible thing to do would be to allow the player to have intellectually honest conversations about biology versus gender, sexual identity and let the player ask questions and form opinions real people would such as "Okay, this is weird but I don't mind / I will get used to it." or "Have you tried to seek any form of help or surgery ?", etc.

 

But nope. We get told what Bioware's views are and we cannot discuss it or challenge it. Because diversity and progressivism.
 


  • Isaidlunch, Mykel54, Milana et 2 autres aiment ceci

#17
Abyss108

Abyss108
  • Members
  • 2 009 messages

You also don't get to tell Cassandra to get get back in the kitchen if women warriors are too progressive for you. Boo hoo.


  • Andraste_Reborn, PhroXenGold, daveliam et 3 autres aiment ceci

#18
nightscrawl

nightscrawl
  • Members
  • 7 472 messages

... perhaps a look at how soldiers and spies deal with effects of PTSD, how they deal with cultural indoctrination, etc.


I'm not too keen on IB myself (for reasons I'll not get into in this thread), but I'm pretty sure this stuff is in there. But I'll have to leave it to someone more knowledgeable than I to point out the various instances.



#19
Witch Cocktor

Witch Cocktor
  • Members
  • 673 messages

This framing of one sided viewpoints on something as "progressive" is rather preposterous. Okay, you want to have a transgender character in game and you make them rather well known through marketing and interview. The sensible thing to do would be to allow the player to have intellectually honest conversations about biology versus gender, sexual identity and let the player ask questions and form opinions real people would such as "Okay, this is weird but I don't mind / I will get used to it." or "Have you tried to seek any form of help or surgery ?", etc.

 

IIRC, you can ask Bull if Krem being a woman is a problem, and in general ask Krem why pose as a woman (never picked that option so idk how that conversation goes). And with Dorian, when he reveals he is gay, you can be like '' spare me the details '' and ask '' never been with a woman?? '' and then after the quest, tell him he is trouble or that you enjoyed the show he put up.

Isn't that enough of options to make your inquisitors anti-LGBT stance quite clear? 

 

Like damn, this game doesn't let you debate about the existence of circles with Viv, or about the Qun with IB, and you expect to be able to have an '' INTELLECTUAL '' conversation about sexuality and gender with Krem or Dorian? Geez.


  • daveliam aime ceci

#20
nightscrawl

nightscrawl
  • Members
  • 7 472 messages

IIRC, you can ask Bull if Krem being a woman is a problem, and in general ask Krem why pose as a woman (never picked that option so idk how that conversation goes). And with Dorian, when he reveals he is gay, you can be like '' spare me the details '' and ask '' never been with a woman?? '' and then after the quest, tell him he is trouble or that you enjoyed the show he put up.
Isn't that enough of options to make your inquisitors anti-LGBT stance quite clear? 
 
Like damn, this game doesn't let you debate about the existence of circles with Viv, or about the Qun with IB, and you expect to be able to have an '' INTELLECTUAL '' conversation about sexuality and gender with Krem or Dorian? Geez.

 
I've actually seen players say that they wanted to "react with disgust" over the Dorian reveal. I don't think the devs are too into allowing that type of RP. I don't recall that they've allowed much bigotry, whether that is against LGBT characters or different (in-game) races. That just doesn't seem like something they are interested in doing. And as much as I appreciate variety in RP choice, I'm with them on that one, but at least it's equal opportunity. They aren't allowing human players to go around calling every elf "knife ear" while disallowing homophobia. In that instance, I think the "spare me the details" -- "That's what I thought. No need to elaborate," -- remark is quite enough to get the point across.
 
With the Krem issue, I really wonder how much of the frustration comes down to the paraphrase system. We'll never know, of course, but it IS something I've thought about. I know that one of the spoken dialogues is completely contrary to what I thought would be said, according to the paraphrase. But in general, I never ask those sorts of questions of characters, deeming them too personal, and it's been so long since I've seen it in the game that I can't even remember what my initial reaction was.
 
In the initial drinking-with-Chargers scene I don't think it is at all appropriate to inquire about such things. Similarly, I never ask Dorian if he and Felix were involved, or if Leliana had a thing with the Divine. However, I've gotten the impression that many players felt they were asking an innocuous question, only to be browbeat by Iron Bull for (what they perceive) as no apparent reason, and that their response might be something like, "I was just asking..."
 
I've seen posts by people in minority groups who are tired of feeling the need to educate people about their ignorance. These individuals get annoyed at being asked the same questions over and over and sometimes just explode in frustration. I get that, and it is totally understandable. BUT, neither Krem nor Iron Bull are real people, they were written by someone else, and I think Bioware missed an opportunity to have a teachable moment, rather than making the player feel bad. And then they criticize the players who then become defensive because they were scolded by a fictional character. I don't think ANY of the handling of it was right or helpful.

 

 

[edit]

I didn't want to delete the original post, since I stand by my words with the mentality I had when I wrote them. BUT after having watched all of the dialogue options, my views are a bit different. Please see this further response post below.


Modifié par nightscrawl, 20 février 2016 - 03:05 .

  • Bayonet Hipshot et Marshal Moriarty aiment ceci

#21
Witch Cocktor

Witch Cocktor
  • Members
  • 673 messages

 I've seen posts by people in minority groups who are tired of feeling the need to educate people about their ignorance. These individuals get annoyed at being asked the same questions over and over and sometimes just explode in frustration. I get that, and it is totally understandable. BUT, neither Krem nor Iron Bull are real people, they were written by someone else, and I think Bioware missed an opportunity to have a teachable moment, rather than making the player feel bad. And then they criticize the players who then become defensive because they were scolded by a fictional character. I don't think ANY of the handling of it was right or helpful.

Excuse my pessimism, but I have no faith that anyone who would like to have an option to debate with an LGBT character about their '' gross/weird '' lifestyle decision ever EVER wanted to actually learn anything or be taught. They wanted to be the ones scolding the character, not them scolding you and your views.

 

Prove me wrong though, I'm VERY interested if anyone who wanted such options would actually like a discussion where you could learn something new or gain a new perspective.


  • jlb524 aime ceci

#22
Midnight Bliss

Midnight Bliss
  • Members
  • 857 messages

The following isn't directed only for Bayonet, but rather anyone who holds these type of views because I've seen a bunch of people throwing around stuff like this.

 

I am not a big fan of Iron Bull. Firstly, he treats his sexual partners in a manner that I find disgusting. I do not like being dominated or being tied up, the sense of being powerless is a big turn off for me and I find people who do enjoy being the submissive wimp to be pathetic. Furthermore, the way he simply assumes all the potential Inquisitors who attempt to approach him for romance to want to be dominated and tied up because of "Ben-Hassrath training" takes away the agency of the player. I don't really find much depth to Iron Bull either. He is all about getting drunk, having sex and being with the Chargers. I expected more from his character, perhaps a look at how soldiers and spies deal with effects of PTSD, how they deal with cultural indoctrination, etc.

Let me guess - if somebody said that you are pathetic and judgemental for calling them a submissive wimp and pathetic because they enjoy being a sub some (or all) the time in their sexual relationship you'd have a problem with it though, right?

 

Bull is a sexual dom, that's who he is. You flirt with him. he's receptive, approaches you and explains what his sexual interests are and that point you decide if that's something you're interested in and react accordingly. If you aren't interested then you say as much, he's cool about it and the topic never comes up again. If you are receptive when you weren't then that's on you for saying you're comfortable doing something you actually weren't comfortable with in secret. This plays out exactly like real life, too, where a real life dom isn't going to discard what excites them sexually just because you don't like it, no more than you'll suddenly be aroused by being their sub just because some hot guy just asked you to do it.

 

The real problem for everybody whining over Bull is that his interactions don't allow for this mary sue self insert bullshit everyone seems to be so fixated on, or as you guys call it "player agency". That his storyline doesn't indulge this vain and idiotic fantasy of some Bioware players that they're so special, their characters are SO amazing, that everyone should be willing to drop who and what are and like on a whim because "you" Say so and to please you.

 

Funnier still how thick this hypocrisy flows when most of the same people I see trashing Bull's storyline and BDSM relationships also demand unconditional tolerance and adoration for homosexual characters and would be infuriated if somebody said female Inquis should be able to have Dorian fall in love with their spirit as a person and request a relationship despite being gay, and the absence of that option is taking away from their player agency. They won't hear of somebody wanting the ability to go "ewwwwwwwwwww GROSS" To Dorian's coming out scene despite it also taking away from the player agency they love so much and always use as a basis for their arguments against the things they don't like/want changed. And unsurprisingly they also want blank check acceptance for whatever other social issues BW forced in to the game and they happen to agree with, but then refuse to reciprocate with Bull and his storyline.

 

Iron Bull is the only true progressive character in DAI, he gives representation to a community of people who it is accepted to call weird, nasty, gross, depraved, freaky, disgusting and alot of the time just treat like subhuman garbage. And that representation comes in the form of someone who is confident about it, open about it, and dgaf how you feel about it because at the end of the day he isn't going to change for you, he isn't going to meet you half way and compromise himself by giving up what turns him on, and because he's perfectly honest and up front about it that's just fine because you're free to just say you aren't interested in those things and walk away. His representation isn't fetishized trash like 50 shades of grey and instead portrays BDSM as normal and a person involved with it as a normal thing practiced by an average guy instead of the 6 eyed boogeyman freak a bunch of people probably would have wanted.

 

It's cool if you don't like Bull and think his characterization/romance was boring or stupid, to each his own. But trying to invalidate people and a lifestyle that brings some pleasure and satisfaction by throwing around words like how it's disgusting and how they're a pathetic whimp for enjoying it is just reprehensible.


  • Abyss108, PhroXenGold, Pressedcat et 9 autres aiment ceci

#23
Gervaise

Gervaise
  • Members
  • 4 531 messages

The odd thing was when I first played DI I didn't really register Krem as being transgender when I first met them.  We had been through two previous games where it was made clear that in Thedas most roles are unisex, except in the Qun, and since Bull was meant to be operating undercover it was obvious he wouldn't bring the Qun mind set to his role as mercenary leader.   So actually it wasn't something I even needed to ask about and then suddenly during the tavern sequence with the Chargers there was that prompt: "Why do you pass?" and I was thinking "What?"    I ignored it and then I got offered it again when talking to Krem on their own, so then I did take it because I was curious as to what was going on.    So in some ways it made an issue out of something that didn't need to be an issue in the game world we occupied.   Hence the feeling that it was pushing a real world agenda and therefore if it was going to be brought up at all, perhaps the issues should have been explored in a bit more depth. 

 

Plus why did it have to be that Tevinter seemed to be the society that gave the LGBT characters all the grief?   In some ways, it would have made much more sense for Krem to have been a female qunari who wasn't allowed to be the gender they felt themselves to be and occupy the role they felt happiest in as that would have been consistent with the lore we had previously be given.    Instead they got into trouble in Tevinter for lying about their gender when applying for a role that they could have occupied regardless.     Plus we had the repeat of the Dorian storyline in a way because Krem's mother wanted them to marry well and help the family's status that way, which was holding up Tevinter society to censure again, when in fact arranged marriages are the norm throughout Thedas.  


  • VorexRyder aime ceci

#24
nightscrawl

nightscrawl
  • Members
  • 7 472 messages

Excuse my pessimism, but I have no faith that anyone who would like to have an option to debate with an LGBT character about their '' gross/weird '' lifestyle decision ever EVER wanted to actually learn anything or be taught. They wanted to be the ones scolding the character, not them scolding you and your views.

 

Prove me wrong though, I'm VERY interested if anyone who wanted such options would actually like a discussion where you could learn something new or gain a new perspective.

 

It was not my intention to link the two scenes, and I don't think the Iron Bull scolding scene is the same as players wanting the option to show disgust with Dorian. To my remembrance, the scene (Chargers drinking scene) is not presented that way. My point was only that I didn't find the scolding to be productive.

 

I don't recall that, at any point prior to that scene, Krem's trans status is at all referenced, nor are any pronouns used when referring to him. I could be wrong though, as I don't have much experience with them in Haven. Learning that Krem was trans was a huge surprise for me, as I had thought that he was a woman (the voice sounds deeper feminine, and in fact is a female VA), who was wearing armor, with a somewhat boyish haircut (I like short hair on women). Before learning he was trans, I considered him to be like Avaline, particularly in the armor, as the DA2 armors (which Krem is wearing!) are not form-fitting, unlike Cassandra's breastplate.

 

I don't think that my observations are at all unreasonable, particularly as there had never been a (significant, serious -- Yes, I do recall Serendipity) trans character in the game before this point. If any mention of Krem as trans had been promoted prior to release, I was unaware of it as I dropped out of the forums shortly after the romance reveals and had not absorbed any DAI-related info for months. I highly doubt I am alone in initially viewing Krem in this way.

 

_____

 

OKAY! After writing the above, I decided to go and watch all of the various options since I had never seen them before. I've gotta say, some players are being way too sensitive about this.

 

For the drinking conversation, the options are,

[Why pass as a man?] You don't have to pass for a man to be a mercenary.

[Are you a woman?] Wait are you...? I didn't realize...

[When did you know?] Did you always know?

 

Krem is a little testy in his response to the first two, but nothing outrageous, with the third being the most innocuous. After each of those, Iron Bull explains about the Aqun-Athlok, basically says, "You're my bro, bro," to Krem, and the conversation moves on to the other Chargers.

 

During Bull's personal investigate dialogue wherein you can ask about Krem (which I also had never seen), I don't find his tone unduly harsh, just insistent. You can't get more clear than, "He's not a woman."

 

Inquisitor: [Him being her isn't an issue?] You don't have any problems with him being a woman?

 

Iron Bull: He's not a woman. Look, I've got horns. You can shoot fire out of your ass [mage PC]. We're probably not the best people to go around deciding what's normal. Krem's a good man. I don't give a nug's ass that it's a little harder for him to p*ss standing up.

 

As for Krem's remarks about himself, as mentioned previously, I recall that there was one dialogue option that made me cringe for the disparity with the actual spoken line (I have never picked it since), and he does respond a little assertively to one remark, but it's really not too bad in the context of the entire conversation. I actually do like the conversation as a whole for the different perspective on Tevinter that it provides.

 

 

In the end, I think this whole kerfuffle is ridiculous.


  • PhroXenGold, daveliam, Shechinah et 6 autres aiment ceci

#25
nightscrawl

nightscrawl
  • Members
  • 7 472 messages

Plus why did it have to be that Tevinter seemed to be the society that gave the LGBT characters all the grief?


To be fair to Tevinter (lol, I know, right?), when you ask Krem if it's "illegal to pass" In Tevinter, he says that it's illegal to lie on a military service form (or something along those lines). In Tevinter, it seems that the role of army grunt is a man's role, not so different from the Qunari, and most real-world armies until the last few decades. So, in light of that remark, it's not that being trans is an issue in and of itself, but the passing to be in the military was. He does admit to having bribed the previous medical guy to look the other way.