I haven't listened to the podcast or whatever, but I'm curious what he was vague about with regards to when the ark leaves...the way that is worded isnt mutually exclusive. The ark could easily leave during the Reaper War, but then the game "starts" en route to Andromeda while on board the ark, and due to the long journey it takes centuries to get there - thus taking place long after ME3.
I dont see how any of that is particularly vague. Indeed, its so predictable that we already predicted it long ago. But its weird that he would be wishy-washy about it when we already know the setting, likely timeline (in the future of ME3) and calling it an "ark" generally implies a vessel used for salvation (in the Biblical sense), such as escaping the Reapers.
When asked about the setting he says:
"Yeah, far in the future. I don't know the exact amount of years but it's definitely a good deal after the original trilogy"
Then asked about seeing which ending BioWare considers canon are they not really gonna address it he says:
"Yeah, that's what I think they're gonna do [not address it]. I really don't think they will. I think it's just gonna start out somehow you know, I don't know if it's gonna start out midway like you know like you're on your way to Andromeda or might show some vague like you know battle in the Milky Way galaxy you know some kind of vague scenar... you know cutscene or something you don't know what ending they picked and from there you go uhm well I think they're actually not gonna address how the trilogy ended because I mean they've stated multiple times that there is no canon ending it's just whatever...and I think it's better that way...."
then on to co-op
Really rough translation. Way too many uhms and uhs for me to account for... ![]()





Retour en haut







