If it wasn't for him, the conclave wouldn't have exploded. But once again, you clearly played a different game to the rest of us.Evanuris all trapped because of him
Eluvians all in his hands
Inquisition tricked by him
If it wasn't for him your character would be dead
do the math
Am i the only one who has a problem with males in this Franchise?
#126
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 04:53
#127
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 06:24
If it wasn't for him, the conclave wouldn't have exploded. But once again, you clearly played a different game to the rest of us.
#128
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 06:28
@DonquijoteFamily: So... where are these "merits" you're speaking of?
Truth is... you have no idea if the other Evunaris are evil. They could all have been good... and Mythal and Fen'Harel could have been evil.
If they weren't even then... they sure are now. Solas is a scumbag.
#129
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 06:31
I think I know...And Denier the dwarf at the Blooming Rose.
Human: Templars for you all day, is it?
Denier: They love dwarves. I don't ask why. Probably don't want to know. At least they tip well.
- vertigomez et Jalepeno Fire aiment ceci
#130
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 06:32
...
I don't understand this thread at all.
Apparently, what makes a companion qualify as 'badass' is if they're independent and don't need the protagonist.... All right... Let's see how the women stack up:
- Leliana needs the Warden to help her figure out her own personality (whether she's Stabby McStabbin' or Sweetie McCupcake)
- Morrigan needs the Warden to help her fix her mommy issues
- Wynne needs the Warden to fix son issues
- Isabela needs Hawke to properly fix the tome/stealing issues
- Merrill needs Hawke to fix her mirror/demon issues
- Aveline needs Hawke to fix her relationship/duty issues
- Cassandra needs the Inquisitor to fix her faith issues
- Vivienne needs the Inquisitor to fix her dying husband/political issues
- Sera needs the Inquisitor to fix her snobby nobles issues
- Josephine needs the Inquisitor to fix her family issues
... Huh.
Uh, yeah. These are called "sidequests". They have them for male characters too.
-Oghren needs the warden to fix his family/dating issues
- Nathaniel needs the warden to fix his daddy/sister issues
- Alistair needs the warden to fix his family issues
- Anders needs Hawke to help him with his "I want to blow up a church" issues
I'm all for pointing out offensive tropes but I just don't see it. Sorry.
- Donquijote and 59 others aime ceci
#131
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 06:36
@DonquijoteFamily: So... where are these "merits" you're speaking of?
Truth is... you have no idea if the other Evunaris are evil. They could all have been good... and Mythal and Fen'Harel could have been evil.
If they weren't even then... they sure are now. Solas is a scumbag.
#132
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 06:38
Uh, yeah. These are called "sidequests". They have them for male characters too.
-Oghren needs the warden to fix his family/dating issues
- Nathaniel needs the warden to fix his daddy/sister issues
- Alistair needs the warden to fix his family issues
- Anders needs Hawke to help him with his "I want to blow up a church" issues
I'm all for pointing out offensive tropes but I just don't see it. Sorry.
Not to mention that most of these female characters with or without the Pc help always reach the same outcome,so yea those are just sidequests
#133
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 06:38
I think I know...
Dwarves are obviously the ultimate lovers.
#134
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 07:17
"What's wrong with males in DA"?
Nothing. Nothing is wrong with them.
Also... what, exactly, qualifies someone as a "loser", I wonder?
- DeathByIcecream aime ceci
#135
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 07:26
"What's wrong with males in DA"?
Nothing. Nothing is wrong with them.
Also... what, exactly, qualifies someone as a "loser", I wonder?
I don't know, but I keep getting distracted by your Beckett avatar.
Dat voice.
- thebigbad1013 aime ceci
#136
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 07:39
"What's wrong with males in DA"?
Nothing. Nothing is wrong with them.
Also... what, exactly, qualifies someone as a "loser", I wonder?
The fact that they need the babysitter because they whine a lot
#137
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 07:52
I find all of the males perfectly fine to be honest. They may have flaws, they may have personalities i may not like, they may have stances I disagree with but in the end they are fine. It would only be "wrong" if all the males in the game acted generally the same.
- Vanilka aime ceci
#138
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 07:56
I find all of the males perfectly fine to be honest. They may have flaws, they may have personalities i may not like, they may have stances I disagree with but in the end they are fine. It would only be "wrong" if all the males in the game acted generally the same.
What fine,they're whiners who became failures if they are not supported by the Pc.
#139
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 08:42
What fine,they're whiners who became failures if they are not supported by the Pc.
Maybe to you, but that is far from the truth in many cases.
- DeathByIcecream aime ceci
#140
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 08:47
The definition of insanity is trying to talk sense to the OP.
- DeathByIcecream aime ceci
#141
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 09:46
I like most of the male characters just fine as well, but then again I also liked Carth and Anomen so maybe I have a thing for "whiners". Call me crazy, but I've always thought that people have a right to get emotional when discussing traumatic points in their history.
- TheyCallMeBunny et Vanilka aiment ceci
#142
Posté 09 mars 2016 - 11:48
The fact that they need the babysitter because they whine a lot
Pot calling kettle black
- aTrueFool et AnimalBoy aiment ceci
#143
Posté 10 mars 2016 - 12:06
...but Solas and Cullen don't "whine" or need help from the Inquisitor? Hmmm.The fact that they need the babysitter because they whine a lot
#144
Posté 10 mars 2016 - 06:20
#145
Posté 10 mars 2016 - 06:21
I think that aside from some few notable exceptions(your highness Solas and Cullen of DAI) the others are a bunch of losers with no fiber and strong temper.The few that could have been interesting to explore die (like Duncan,Daveth and Riordan).So what's wrong with males in DA? Where are the badassess strong male characters?
LOSERS
King Alistair- a spineless loser IF he dumps a his love interest (nonhuman, nonhuman) in favor of becoming King because suddenly that is more important. He never loved her, but is willing to keep her as a piece of ass on the side. Loser for sure.
Anders- should have killed himself instead of putting that decision on Hawke. Coward.
Varric- surely likable, but a real pushover when it comes to Bianca. He seems incapable of taking a clear stance on issues in DAI
Iron Bull- can't make the decision to save or sacrifice the Chargers on his own. Guess that's why he'd never be Arishok
WINNERS
Loghain - he loses the battle but accepts his defeat with dignity if you kill him OR if made a Grey Warden, fully embraces his duty in DAI. He follows his own personal convictions, and what he thinks is right. It's admirable at least.
- Secret Rare, German Soldier et Donquijote and 59 others aiment ceci
#146
Posté 10 mars 2016 - 06:28
#147
Posté 10 mars 2016 - 06:51
So from what I gather, the definition of "loser" in this topic is "anyone who makes a bad or unpopular decision or who has difficulty overcoming painful or complicated emotional issues, unless I happen to like them".
Overcoming deeply instilled cultural beliefs while knowing that doing so will forfeit your place in the society to which you've belonged for your entire life is, after all, an easy affair for anyone who isn't a big losery loser like the Iron Bull. Anders should have just done the responsible thing after blowing up a city block because it's clear that he's totally in his right mind during the entirety of DA2 and therefore should be judged in the same way as a normal person who isn't mentally ill/so-fundamentally-enmeshed-with-an-alien-intelligence-that-he-freely-admits-that-he-can't-tell-where-one-of-them-ends-and-the-other-begins. Trust me, I am not one of those "Anders did nothing wrong!" people and, while I like Iron Bull well enough, he's not my favorite character. Still, I think some people are seriously under representing how difficult it can be to make these kinds of choices.
It's especially mystifying because I can't see how the female characters aren't largely the same. Leliana doesn't resolve her issues with Marjolaine without the Warden's help, and the way we handle the quest strongly influences her outlook. If not for Hawke's influence, Isabella would have happily run off with the book despite knowing that people are dying in the streets of Kirkwall in large part because of her actions. Aveline, despite being a strong and normally very confident woman, can't even talk to the boy she likes, and Cassandra looks to the Inquisitor to decide whether or not she should try to reform the Seekers after her faith is shaken in her personal quest.
Struggling with doubt and looking to the people you trust for guidance doesn't make someone a loser, in my opinion.
- aTrueFool, Vanilka et DeathByIcecream aiment ceci
#148
Posté 10 mars 2016 - 07:31
So from what I gather, the definition of "loser" in this topic is "anyone who makes a bad or unpopular decision or who has difficulty overcoming painful or complicated emotional issues, unless I happen to like them".
Not really. I don't necessarily like/dislike the characters I mentioned. I assessed based on the criteria OP posted. I suppose the exception is King Alistair, which is mostly poor writing. The whole "I'll only marry a non mage human queen" was simply artificial drama and plot convenience. It was as ill-conceived as the Old God Baby, which Bioware has said they regretted.
#149
Posté 10 mars 2016 - 08:59
No - I like them all. Alistair is my favorite though.
Have we really run out of things to argue about that we have to resort to this?
So from what I gather, the definition of "loser" in this topic is "anyone who makes a bad or unpopular decision or who has difficulty overcoming painful or complicated emotional issues, unless I happen to like them".
Overcoming deeply instilled cultural beliefs while knowing that doing so will forfeit your place in the society to which you've belonged for your entire life is, after all, an easy affair for anyone who isn't a big losery loser like the Iron Bull. Anders should have just done the responsible thing after blowing up a city block because it's clear that he's totally in his right mind during the entirety of DA2 and therefore should be judged in the same way as a normal person who isn't mentally ill/so-fundamentally-enmeshed-with-an-alien-intelligence-that-he-freely-admits-that-he-can't-tell-where-one-of-them-ends-and-the-other-begins. Trust me, I am not one of those "Anders did nothing wrong!" people and, while I like Iron Bull well enough, he's not my favorite character. Still, I think some people are seriously under representing how difficult it can be to make these kinds of choices.
It's especially mystifying because I can't see how the female characters aren't largely the same. Leliana doesn't resolve her issues with Marjolaine without the Warden's help, and the way we handle the quest strongly influences her outlook. If not for Hawke's influence, Isabella would have happily run off with the book despite knowing that people are dying in the streets of Kirkwall in large part because of her actions. Aveline, despite being a strong and normally very confident woman, can't even talk to the boy she likes, and Cassandra looks to the Inquisitor to decide whether or not she should try to reform the Seekers after her faith is shaken in her personal quest.
Struggling with doubt and looking to the people you trust for guidance doesn't make someone a loser, in my opinion.
#150
Posté 10 mars 2016 - 12:38
You know who's a really strong, well written male character? The Nug King.

- ArcaneEsper aime ceci





Retour en haut







