Agree! I think polyamory is a good idea !
But not all LIs in MEA can accept it, someone or some race maybe disagree, maybe angry with you.
maybe you and your LIs can happy together, maybe they will infight with each other
.Anyway, that Polyamory and monogamy coexist in MEA story is a great idea I think
That's not polygamy then, but polyamory. Polygamy only applies in terms of marriage.
Ah alright. I'm getting confused about all these terms.
well technically its not illegal to cheat on your SO either
Actually in some countries is has been/is, I think Korea just recently got rid of that law 
We have enough romance threads
I'm just waiting for it to evolve into... can I romance X BSN poster?
Sexual orientation toggle is among the worst and most superfluous ideas that they could ever conceivably implement in an rpg.
Hard to say if people are truly serious when it's suggested, because it's just so silly a feature.
Hard to say if people are truly serious when it's suggested, because it's just so silly a feature.
Actually in some countries is has been/is, I think Korea just recently got rid of that law
well other countries need to get their sh*t together
I wonder how many people would just want to romance themselves.
I wouldn't mind this
Greetings,
Yeah, I can agree that to some we are just bouncing around ideas and concept or at least in my case. But I do think it would interest to a character who is in love with themselves would be interesting in both an interaction and a role playing aspect. I do think a character should comment on your relationships or the scene from DA:I with Iron Bull, the player character and every other NPC in the game. 
I don't like when characters act the same scene to scene.
I think white privilege is the biggest issue we face today. In all countries and in all walks of life. It is NOT first world problems, its a humanity problem and omg if you're born and you are a male....your life is already laid out and you will be successful. Whens the last time you saw a poor white male? Exactly.
When creating your character profile, why not include Sexual Orientation? That way, certain characters are available, certain characters are not. That would also add a touch of realism.
Why not indeed?
I wonder how many people would just want to romance themselves.
What the hell is the point of marrying yourself? You end up in the hospital, your own visitation rights are kind of useless.
...A sexuality toggle is more realistic. Really. Gods know I chose my sexuality at birth. Didn't everyone? </sarcasm>
Actually, you never chose anything of the sort. You simply are what you are.
A player character doesn't choose anything either. They are what we make them.
I don't see the problem, particularly since OP's suggestion doesn't seem like a toggle to me, any more than I "toggled" whether Shepard was space or earthborn.
Are you sure? Maybe I should start another one just in case...
You can never have too many romance threads. 
I don't see the problem, particularly since OP's suggestion doesn't seem like a toggle to me, any more than I "toggled" whether Shepard was space or earthborn.
If we're speaking strictly in terms of functionality, these two are not the same thing at all. The history/backgrounds of Shepard provide material for the player to determine the kind of character they'd like to play. However, these backgrounds don't lock you into any decisions. For example, if they worked like this " sexuality toggle", you wouldn't be able to make the decision of whether or not you spare Balak or sacrifice the hostages, because the background predetermines the outcome.
So what good would this feature really be? It seems to me that the only people who think they might benefit would be people who just want to manually lock out content they can already avoid themselves, which is stupid.
It's probably because a lot of them found Dorian irresistable in DAI, so now they know they need a toggle to keep themselves from giving in to the temptation.
I know right? I made a male PC specifically to romance him.
If we're speaking strictly in terms of functionality, these two are not the same thing at all. The history/backgrounds of Shepard provide material for the player to determine the kind of character they'd like to play. However, these backgrounds don't lock you into any decisions. For example, if they worked like this " sexuality toggle", you wouldn't be able to make the decision of whether or not you spare Balak or sacrifice the hostages, because the background predetermines the outcome.
So what good would this feature really be? It seems to me that the only people who think they might benefit would be people who just want to manually lock out content they can already avoid themselves, which is stupid.
And we are assuming this would lock you in? I don't think that was the intention. Someone else remarked it might be used to change some NPC's behavior around you. This would probably result in some lines being different, just as Shepard's background does.
I think the word "toggle" is raising some preconceptions that people are (over)reacting to.
And we are assuming this would lock you in? I don't think that was the intention. Someone else remarked it might be used to change some NPC's behavior around you. This would probably result in some lines being different, just as Shepard's background does.
I think the word "toggle" is raising some preconceptions that people are (over)reacting to.
But then, wouldn't that strike someone as being some kind of user-activated censor, which has the sole purpose of blocking "objectionable" character content? I guess instead of asking what the benefit is supposed to be, I suppose I should ask who is this supposed to benefit, and why should BioWare care about those people.
Retour en haut
