The typical supermodel ideal is, btw, an amalgam of biological and cultural factors. They're all relatively young and healthy (from their appearance at least)
Ha, they don't look healthy to me!
@Tidus:
It is a cultural conceit to include personality under the "beauty" tab. Having an unpleasant personality does not make a beautiful person ugly. It might make them less attractive at second glance, but that's a different thing.
No, to me it really does, which is the point many people have been trying to make for the last page. Beauty is different to everyone. It's of no consequence if you can average out some polls and say "Oh, this is what is ideally attractive, because reproduction", because every individual is different. Seems odd I have to say that. I mean, how useful is that "ideal" if it can be subverted by talking to any random person?
I feel like the people saying things like "Women will never look better with short hair, because 'science'" and "Bald people look good despite being bald" need to get off their high horse. Don't inflate your opinion into something more. I'm not trying to be rude, just make a point. Hopefully it made sense.