Your opinion isn't a source and state what exactly in the Weekes interview is a source for your opinion.
I base my opinion on the facts of the game itself, not the writers. I was just pointing out where the writers made statements that support the fact that Viddasala was unauthorized in her actions. I only point this out because you and others on your side are trying to claim that Weekes' statements imply the opposite, despite the fact that neither you nor anyone on your side can actually QUOTE Weekes saying anything of the sort.
So here is my proof:
Game Developers Conference
Moscone Center San Francisco, CA
March 14-18, 2016 . Expo March 14-18
Goals for Trespasser
Set up the future of the franchise.
3:30 Epler - The Qunari, an invading force from across the sea that hates magic.
Here Epler refers to the Qunari we see in Trespasser as
an invading force that hates magic. So clearly he is not referring to the Qunari people. He is only referring to the Qunari in the DLC that try to invade. This is Viddasala's group. This means Viddasala's group is separate from the rest of Qunari society in what they are doing in the DLC.
20:00 Weekes - Solas' spy, who points out the Qunari body, was not supposed to be his spy in the original draft. Idea added later.
This proves two things. 1. "The Qunari" can refer to anything, from one individual Qunari to the Qunari as a people or as race. So just because someone says "the Qunari" doesn't mean they are referring to the Qunari people or the Qunari leadership. 2. The original story had this elf as your agent. They changed this in the end to be Solas' agent. This proves that storylines can start out one way but end up being something completely different. Just because this elf was your agent in one of the first drafts doesn't mean she is in the canon release. So you wouldn't argue that she is actually an Inquisition agent, would you? No, because the storyline was changed. This is very important.
22:20 Wanted to have the Qunari present.
Establish the Qunari as a threat. Amp up tension.
Tie Qunari to lyrium mining. Hopefully enough of a hook. It wasn't.
The Qunari didn't have a great reason to be there mining lyrium. No story connection.
This is all self-explanatory. They had the Qunari minding lyrium, it wasn't enough of a hook because they had no reason and this didn't connect to the story in any way.
23:10 Weekes - At the start of the dungeon, you knew the Qunari were a problem doing something bad. At the end of the dungeon, you knew the Qunari were a problem doing something bad. No rising tension.
Explain what they are doing and give them a reason.
Again, Weekes is referring to the Qunari in Trespasser as "the Qunari". Not the Qunari as a nation or as a race. Also, he wants to give them a reason to be there mining lyrium.
23:33 Epler - Tension graphing. Low tension x3, then all of a sudden you're fighting the "Qunari leader".
John Epler explains the graph showing how much tension there was in the DLC at each stage. He points out three places with low tension, the Deep Roads included, and then refers to the stage in which the tension jumps and we are fighting the "Qunari leader". He is clearly referring to Viddasala and identifying her as the Qunari's leader. This proves that she was the top commander of this mission, and that she was alone in this command. Epler didn't call her "one of the Qunari leaders", he called her THE Qunari leader.
Now, we know from the game that she is nothing more than the head of the Ben-Hassrath's Dangerous Purpose branch. She is not a leader among the Qunari people. She is an agent. Calling her the leader proves that Dragon's Breath was her idea and hers alone. She had no other agents lateral or above her to direct the mission. She was the only high ranking official there. No other high ranking Qunari agent was involved. Not any other priest of the Ben-Hassrath, not the Ariqun, not the other members of the Triumvirate.
This proves Viddasala was unauthorized. In an authorized operation, she would not have been the leader.
24:05 Writing side. Weekes - What do the Qunari hate? Magic. They want to suppress magic. Best way to suppress magic is templars, so what if the Qunari were making templars? What if the Qunari were mining lyrium to make templars? This makes sense.
So here is Weekes explaining their thought process for giving the Qunari a reason to be there mining lyrium. The Qunari hate magic, so the first idea was to make templars.
24:40 Jerran explains Qunari are here mining lyrium to make templars so they can suppress our mages when they invade the South. This makes sense... or not.
The first idea was to have Jerran explain that the Qunari were making templars so they can suppress the Southern mages when they invade. This made sense, until it didn't.
Three things here. 1. Just because they are planning to invade the South doesn't mean the Triumvirate was. 2. This storyline was scrapped. So regardless of what you think Weekes was referring to, this storyline is not canon because it didn't make sense. 3. Even if the Triumvirate approved of a plan such as this, they wouldn't have started it during Trespasser. The Qunari would have tested out the templars ahead of time against Tevinter first. It makes no sense to test them right before Dragon's Breath. So the Triumvirate being involved makes no sense.
25:20 No templars in the DLC until now. Trying to add templars to the Qunari using magical mirrors to smuggle explosives into courts across Thedas, Exalted Council, mark on your hand, ancient elves, etc, was too much.
Going into the story on templars was too much.
25:55 Needed something simpler, something to work with the gameplay. Took out idea of Qunari templars. Didn't make sense. What did make sense was the saarebas.
A few things here. They scrapped the idea of Qunari templars being used for invasion to suppress southern mages. Scrapped it. Gone. Dead. Now, if the Triumvirate had at any point been intended to be part of this operation as having authorized it (which they weren't, and Weekes indicates this is still Viddasala only), then dropping this templar storyline would also mean dropping any storyline about the Triumvirate authorizing it. We know this because what are you left with to combat southern mages during an official invasion?
In other words, if your plan was to invade with templar Qunari to combat southern mages, but then this idea gets scrapped, then what would the official invasion use instead? Nothing. There is nothing else you can use.
So they replaced this with a plot where the Viddasala uses saarebas instead. This is because a saarbas fits the gameplay style.
26:19 Weekes - The saarebas are suppressed by the
Qunari culture. The Qunari in Trespasser give lyrium to saarebas. They're making super-weapons. Taking parched mages and hooking them up to a fire-hose.
This is objectively a really bad idea for the Qunari. But that is the kind of short term gain/long term loss, dangerous deal with the devil that
characters in the Dragon Age universe make all the time.
And here is Weekes' 100% irrefutable confirmation that Viddasala was unauthorized. He differentiates the Qunari in Trespasser from the rest of Qunari culture. Separating the two. What the Qunari in Trespasser were directed to do is the exact opposite of what Qunari culture has taught since the culture was founded. The Qunari culture suppresses saarebas to magic. Viddasala and those she ordered around were immersing saarebas in magic. This directly contradicts the Qun and Qunari culture. The Triumvirate is confirmed to have no part in this by extension.
Weekes also confirms this is a bad idea, but is the type of deal that DA
characters make all the time. By referring to characters, Weekes confirms this is Viddasala alone. This is not the Triumvirate as a collective making this choice. It is only Viddasala.
Also, to go back to my previous point of what else would you invade with, saarebas would not be the Triumvirate's answer. Not only would the Qunari not have templars to combat southern mages, but they would then be using their own saarebas. What does the South have to combat these saarebas? Templars! So how does it make sense to send your own mages against templars in the South? Clearly this was just Viddasala's insane plan, and Jerran even states as much in the game.
And to bring up another previous point, even if we are to believe that the Triumvirate made a sudden 180 on keeping saarebas separate from all magic, and instead started powering them up with lyrium (in violation of the Qun), then once again I state that they would have tested all of this on Seheron first in battles against Tevinter. They would not risk testing them during Dragon's Breath, which was supposedly the linchpin to a southern invasion.
29:07 Revision - Test ideas to see if they work. If they don't you can change them to something better.
This part proves that the writing team had ideas that didn't work, and they scrapped them. So even if Dragon's Breath was meant to be official at some point during production, then it was scrapped before the final release. But I contend this was never to be an authorized mission, and both Weekes and Epler confirmed this in the conference presentation.
*facepalm* They did a complete opposite.
No, Weekes and Epler clearly differentiated between the Qunari we fight in Trespasser with the rest of Qunari culture. Their statements prove the mission was not authorized.
If he follows orders of Tal Vashoth he's going Tal Vashoth - whether he follows orders or not he'd be going against the Qun.
But that isn't the case with all the Qunari who were following Viddasala in trying to execute Dragon's Breath. So why would it be the case with Hissrad? All it would mean is that he was tricked along with the rest of his fellow Qunari.
Like - what use the Qunari would have of a spy who can't tell what is a real order or not, or follows it to save his own a**???
The Qunari want blind followers, not those who think for themselves. It is possible that Hissrad could have ignored Viddasala's order, yet still been declared Tal-Vashoth by her and all Qunari at the Darvaarad, and then be executed as a Tal-Vashoth by the Triumvirate for ignoring the order of what was thought to be an official Viddasala, even though she was also Tal-Vashoth. The Qunari thinking is messed up.
They might acknowledge that Viddasala was Tal-Vashoth, but they might also claim that it wasn't Hissrad's place to question her orders and make that determination.
Not saying the Triumvirate would definitely rule this way, but Hissrad could have perceived that as a possibility. Thus, better to die with fellow Qunari than risk being declared Tal-Vashoth at all.
Your little speculation would work only if IB was a complete moron OR if he acted on sort of a confused impulse.
And as we have seen in the Trespasser DLC, most of the characters in it act like complete morons.
Confusion may have played a part in Hissrad's choice. Maybe he wasn't sure if Viddasala was authorized or not, but when he was given an order, it made him feel safe and certain. So instead of question it, leading to more confusion, he just chose to blindly follow it.
Problem is that when he's re-Qunverted, there are NO impulses and his actions are very deliberate. It's decidedly noted that after his visit to Par Vollen he acts reserved, and if you take Cole on a mission to Darvaraad, he notes that Iron Bull was "empty inside". So there was no terror, he was fully committed to the mission ever since his re-education.
Disproved by the fact that he didn't attack you right off the rip when we first ran up to the Qunari in the elvhen ruins.
Cole was only commenting on how Hissrad felt about turning on you. Cole makes no mention of what Hissrad knew beforehand. In fact, the epilogue slides show that no one knows if Hissrad didn't know he would have to turn on the Inquisition, or if he was lying the whole time. So no, Cole gave no input.
Also, if Hissrad proves himself on the Storm Coast, he is not reeducated.
And even if you say that this is "just my interpretation" there still remains the fact that Weekes completely destroys yours when he said - for the n-th time - that Bull. Would. Not. Betray. Us. For. A. Rogue. Group.
Again, this wasn't a rogue group. It was a real group that was being misused by an unauthorized Viddasala.
And I think he knows the character he wrote way better than you.
Weekes and Epler confirmed that Viddasala was unauthorized during the conference.
You saying that over and over again isn't going to change the fact that that source you're linking proves the exact opposite... but I think you know that and are just hoping no one will check.
I posted all relevant points above. Refute them if you can.
Surely even the Triumvirate has an intelligence branch used for cloak and dagger endeavours to advance their agenda overseas and give them a certain level of plausible deniability.
Wet work has been a staple of many governments and only a compete and total fool would leave any incriminating paperwork of any kind to be seen,one of the first thing that happens when attacked is the spies try to halt the enemy while destroying any incriminating evidence,these are veteran "spies", if you found something it is most likely they wanted you to find it.
Being disavowed if caught is part and parcel of the game they play and they are aware if they are caught they will be thrown to the wolves.
But why would they need plausible deniability if they plan to invade the South regardless? Either the opening attack succeeds or it doesn't. It wouldn't cause the entire invasion to be called off. It would just make the invasion more difficult. And if this were a mission that could be called off or denied, then why wasn't it aborted the moment the Qunari soldier stumbled into the Winter Palace? Why would Par Vollen continue with the operation after the Inquisition was tipped to it, and while there is an agent of Fen'Harel running around petri-frying Qunari left and right, laying down unquenchable flames, and making spirits jump out of wolf statues and bookshelves? What kind of leaders look at the calamitous events befalling the Qunari in the Winter Palace, elven ruins, Crossroads, and Shattered Library and say, "yeah, proceed with the invasion plans"?
Yes Viddasala tried to destroy evidence that the Triumvirate did not authorize her to carry out any actions against the South. As for wanting you to find things, that would assume they expected you to reach the ruins, mines, library, and Darvaarad in the first place, which they didn't. And even the elven servant in the Winter Palace was given written instructions to place the gaatlok and then go to the mirror by a bookcase. So no, Viddasala didn't care about leaving a paper trail.
No one argues that. The problem is, if Viddasala really was acting alone without authorization, then the Triumvirate would truthfully disavow her in that case.