I don't have one. I'm questioning yours, not proposing my own. Honestly, I found Weekes' statement a bit confusing.
What's your interpretation of the letters? What are they there for? Outright mistake? Possible. Deliberate misleading of the player? To what end?
More likely that the Triumvirate are officially invoking plausible deniability, because the plan was discovered before it could be carried out, leading them to denounce her as a scapegoat to cover their own backsides. We're told that there were several other letters in Qunlat going back and forth on the desk, so there's some degree of communication taking place between the Darvaraad and Par Vollen, it's not like she was operating previously in the dark.
Now, does this denouncement mean that she carried out the mission against new mission directives that aborted it... I suppose that is a possibility, because her crumpling the letter shows she was not happy by "official" story the Triumvirate went with.
But it seems more likely to me that Par Vollen always intended her to carry out the mission regardless, but were prepared to label her Tal-Vashoth if she failed, something that infuriated her. You can't really blame her for that. Imagine how you'd feel doing your duty and following orders, only to be branded a traitor regardless of whether you succeeded at your mission.
Either way, it's clear she's never going to be able to go home again... so what does she have to lose?





Retour en haut





