IF wyverns can be tamed,why GW used griffins?
#1
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 02:19
#3
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 03:30
- TheyCallMeBunny et Andreas Amell aiment ceci
#4
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 03:42
Obviously the Wardens should have dedicated themselves to taming dragons. They fly and breath fire/lightning/ice!
I mean, they also hibernate for decades/centuries at a time, but I'm sure they could poke them with sticks to wake them up if a Blight started.
- Ahriman, lynroy, coldwetn0se et 2 autres aiment ceci
#5
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 06:56
#6
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 07:08
Female Wyverns can take the crap out of a High Dragon, problem comes when they only show such aggressive behaviour while protecting their nest, taming a Wyvern seems also to be something hard, we know only of two tamed Wyverns: Leopold and another who is an Avvar Hold Beast.
And Duke Prosper even says about Leopold that tamed may be too strong a word.
#7
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 08:04
Wyverns can't fly. The main advantage of the griffons is that you can engage in aerial combat both raining death on the earthbound darkspawn and engaging the arch demon. You need something to bring the arch demon down to ground level or something that can fly fast enough to catch up with it in the air so that a Grey Warden can get in a position to kill it. On the ground you need something speedy and agile. A Wyvern might be tough but it would simply be overwhelmed by large numbers of darkspawn and not able to move out of the way quickly enough. Now apparently in Tevinter they purposely breed dracolisks as cavalry mounts and I could see these being useful in fighting darkspawn, particularly the ones that can spit poison and breath ice and fire. The latter though apparently belong exclusively to the Archon's family. So if the Blight was affecting Tevinter I could see them offering them to the Wardens but in the 4th Blight Tevinter was conspicuous in its refusal to offer aid outside its own borders and with the 5th Blight it was over practically before the more distant nations knew it had begun and of course we had no griffons to help us because they were thought to be extinct.
#8
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 10:18
The Duke's wyvern never really seemed 'tamed' to me, more like 'drugged, trapped, and angry about it'. ![]()
I'm hoping he'd have taken the chance to stomp the Duke if he got it...
#9
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 11:09
Aside from the flying thing, the griffons are not "tamed," they are partners and companions, with their own personalities and a high degree of intelligence. The Warden bonds with their griffon; Last Flight makes this very clear.
- vbibbi, AntiChri5, theskymoves et 2 autres aiment ceci
#10
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 11:18
Obviously the Wardens should have dedicated themselves to taming dragons. They fly and breath fire/lightning/ice!
I mean, they also hibernate for decades/centuries at a time, but I'm sure they could poke them with sticks to wake them up if a Blight started.
How do you notice the Blight has begun? It starts raining stones from nearest GW citadel.
Actually it could work if they managed to breed some kind of midget dragons, which don't need to eat village a day and are easier to control.
#11
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 12:35
Obviously the Wardens should have dedicated themselves to taming dragons. They fly and breath fire/lightning/ice!
I mean, they also hibernate for decades/centuries at a time, but I'm sure they could poke them with sticks to wake them up if a Blight started.
#12
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 12:38
Wyverns can't fly. The main advantage of the griffons is that you can engage in aerial combat both raining death on the earthbound darkspawn and engaging the arch demon. You need something to bring the arch demon down to ground level or something that can fly fast enough to catch up with it in the air so that a Grey Warden can get in a position to kill it. On the ground you need something speedy and agile. A Wyvern might be tough but it would simply be overwhelmed by large numbers of darkspawn and not able to move out of the way quickly enough. Now apparently in Tevinter they purposely breed dracolisks as cavalry mounts and I could see these being useful in fighting darkspawn, particularly the ones that can spit poison and breath ice and fire. The latter though apparently belong exclusively to the Archon's family. So if the Blight was affecting Tevinter I could see them offering them to the Wardens but in the 4th Blight Tevinter was conspicuous in its refusal to offer aid outside its own borders and with the 5th Blight it was over practically before the more distant nations knew it had begun and of course we had no griffons to help us because they were thought to be extinct.
#13
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 12:40
And Duke Prosper even says about Leopold that tamed may be too strong a word.
yea in fact Leopold was more of a friend for the Duke.
#14
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 12:54
Speaking of Wyverns? Has anyone else noticed that it is pronounced strangely in DA? In other fictional works, I have always heard it pronounced "why-vern" and not "wivern." This might be just be a regional thing that I am unaware of.
#15
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 02:10
Speaking of Wyverns? Has anyone else noticed that it is pronounced strangely in DA? In other fictional works, I have always heard it pronounced "why-vern" and not "wivern." This might be just be a regional thing that I am unaware of.
Maybe that's because we often hear Orlesians using the word?
#16
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 02:18
Maybe that's because we often hear Orlesians using the word?
That's possible.
The first time I remember hearing it was when the you acquire the side quest "Wyrm Hole" from Judith in Crestwood. Crestwood is in Fereldan, but that does not to assume that Judith is Fereldan, but I kind of did. Yet, the possibility remains that she picked up the pronunciation from an Orlesian.
The next time I remember hearing it is from Vivienne, when she tasks you with her personal quest. Clearly, she is influenced by Orlesian culture, but her accent is still not Orlesian, and she is from the Free Marches. Still, could be influential on her pronunciation.
My Inquisitor responds to these with the same pronunciation as well, and she is from the Free Marches.
Maybe its a Free Marches thing? Hmm...
#17
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 02:18
Actually, Wyverns are more brutish and violent than Dragons, but they are smaller and cannot fly, I think it's like the difference between cats and lions, cats are more violent but since they are small you can have one, while a lion is big and can harm people with ease.I don't get the sarcasm here.
Wyvern can be tamed and female wyvern are powerful and loyal creatures when they are tamed and trained
Dragons can't be tamed without forgotten ancient magic of Evanuris.
I guess that Kolgrim's gong can count as some training, and the Queen of Dragons doesn't seems to be submitted by magic.
#18
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 02:22
That's possible.
The first time I remember hearing it was when the you acquire the side quest "Wyrm Hole" from Judith in Crestwood. Crestwood is in Fereldan, but that does not to assume that Judith is Fereldan, but I kind of did. Yet, the possibility remains that she picked up the pronunciation from an Orlesian.
The next time I remember hearing it is from Vivienne, when she tasks you with her personal quest. Clearly, she is influenced by Orlesian culture, but her accent is still not Orlesian, and she is from the Free Marches. Still, could be influential on her pronunciation.
My Inquisitor responds to these with the same pronunciation as well, and she is from the Free Marches.
Maybe its a Free Marches thing? Hmm...
Well, yes, it could be, Chateau Haine was located on the Free Marches too, right?
- IllustriousT aime ceci
#19
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 02:49
Well, yes, it could be, Chateau Haine was located on the Free Marches too, right?
Good Point, which supports the Orlesian influence.
I say - mystery solved - good enough anyhow.
Thanks!
#20
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 03:38
Because a long time ago humans for completly arbitrary reasons decided that "reptiles are abhorrent" and therefore only villains are allowed to have reptile-based pets in fictional works. So the bad guy's (in this case) Darkspawn gets a huge awesome dragon to lead them and the good guys (grey Wardens) have to get something fluffy with fur and/or feathers that looks cute in comparison. Here you go have some Gryphons.
- German Soldier aime ceci
#21
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 04:29
Actually, Wyverns are more brutish and violent than Dragons, but they are smaller and cannot fly, I think it's like the difference between cats and lions, cats are more violent but since they are small you can have one, while a lion is big and can harm people with ease.
I guess that Kolgrim's gong can count as some training, and the Queen of Dragons doesn't seems to be submitted by magic.
Well i don't like the comparision because Wyverns aren't cats whle dragons are lions,wyverns can actually kill dragons and Leopold was very big and able to made jump on high distances.
#22
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 04:33
Because a long time ago humans for completly arbitrary reasons decided that "reptiles are abhorrent" and therefore only villains are allowed to have reptile-based pets in fictional works. So the bad guy's (in this case) Darkspawn gets a huge awesome dragon to lead them and the good guys (grey Wardens) have to get something fluffy with fur and/or feathers that looks cute in comparison. Here you go have some Gryphons.
In fictional works often lizards based creature are portrayed as evil and i don't like that since in most cases they are animals without any degree of malevolence.
#23
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 04:37
Because a long time ago humans for completly arbitrary reasons decided that "reptiles are abhorrent" and therefore only villains are allowed to have reptile-based pets in fictional works. So the bad guy's (in this case) Darkspawn gets a huge awesome dragon to lead them and the good guys (grey Wardens) have to get something fluffy with fur and/or feathers that looks cute in comparison. Here you go have some Gryphons.
Well, not completely in this case, Dragons and Wyverns are feral but not evil, Prosper himself was not evil, we get to fight him because of Talis, but Prosper was only using common sense by trying to earn an advantage against the annoying and illogical zealots trolls known as Qunari.
#24
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 04:58
Well, not completely in this case, Dragons and Wyverns are feral but not evil, Prosper himself was not evil, we get to fight him because of Talis, but Prosper was only using common sense by trying to earn an advantage against the annoying and illogical zealots trolls known as Qunari.
We also have an evil Dragon cult in Haven, evil Darkspawn Archdemon-Dragons, an Red lyrium Dragon that serves Corypheus, codex entries about evil reptile people and while Dragons and Wyverns aren't really evil they frequently threaten human settelments and we have to kill them. Oh and said illogical zealot trolls are implied to be somehow linked to dragons themselves.
But at least I got a Dracolisk in DAI, so maybe the villains monopoly on reptilian sidekicks finally loosens.
#25
Posté 29 mars 2016 - 05:14
Well, not completely in this case, Dragons and Wyverns are feral but not evil, Prosper himself was not evil, we get to fight him because of Talis, but Prosper was only using common sense by trying to earn an advantage against the annoying and illogical zealots trolls known as Qunari.
Hey now, Prosper was clearly a massive bag of d**ks. Maybe he wasn't EEEEEVIL, but his demise was his own doing.





Retour en haut







