The authors aren't this supreme authority you think they may be and just because they wrote a character that doesn't mean that their vision should be in any way relevant for the perspective of the player.
It's relevant to the perspective of the player, because it's relevant to where they're going with a story OR a character, which may later impact player's enjoyment or expectations from the story. Some of the reactions to Iron Bull's betrayal and obvious bad intentions of the Qunari prove that enough.
I mean sure, the player can feel all they want about a character, but that doesn't mean that they got their characterization right, or that they can tell other people that they're right, at least to an extent to what author has intended. In that regard they are indeed supreme authority, since it's THEIR creation, even if they can't control how audience members view them. And if we're trying to establish something about a character, but people can't come to the consensus based on evidence of the game, their word on that regard matters - Solas can't be simultaneously a cartoony supervillain or an incarnation of chaos and evil with no redeeming qualities and a sympathetic antagonist who may yet be redeemable. He can't simultaneously be a scoundrel who lies at every step and a person who generally avoids lying and if he does so, he lies by omission. He can't be an uncaring bastard with no sympathy for not-people and a deeply conflicted person who cares about his new friends. As much as Solas is gray and in-between, some things are to too irreconcilable.
Like, we're talking two different characters here. And one of them only exists in someone's head.





Retour en haut







