69 réponses à ce sujet

[GoldenGail3]

Okay. *feels indifferent about this*

[Catastrophy]

I am at a loss. Could someone break it down to me what that means to Space Hamster and Asari LIs?

[GoldenGail3]

I am at a loss. Could someone break it down to me what that means to Space Hamster and Asari LIs?

Thank you for understanding me.

[Commander Rpg]

I am at a loss. Could someone break it down to me what that means to Space Hamster and Asari LIs?

The first is a reference to a constant humorous reminder about a pet hamster that a crazy ranger used to bring with him in every battle.

The second one is mostly gibberish, but it can be intended as "fictional alien race you would like to drill in".

[Iakus]

The first is a reference to a constant humorous reminder about a pet hamster that a crazy ranger used to bring with him in every battle.

 

Then say it louder!  We must inspire fear in evil!  Quiet tales of hamsters are foolish, but a man and his hamster that tear evil limb from limb?  That's scary!

[Draining Dragon]

Then say it louder!  We must inspire fear in evil!  Quiet tales of hamsters are foolish, but a man and his hamster that tear evil limb from limb?  That's scary!

This behavior must not continue! Feel the burning stare of my hamster and change your ways!

[Commander Rpg]

This behavior must not continue! Feel the burning stare of my hamster and change your ways!

That damn hamster would rob me of a quick item slot though. It was so annoying.

[CHRrOME]

That's what I've said.

It feels dumb to ask very specific questions about a game people know nothing about, but hey I'm not the one with the "marketing degree" .

[Ieldra]

Hmph. If this is the quality of EA "surveys", we can only hope they'll never put their genius to something important.

[aoibhealfae]

Honestly, the part I love about Hawke and Shepard was the fact that they can be made into an anti-hero. Even if the game try to dress you up like you're everyone savior but you can be selfless and ignorant about your status which I really like. Its really stupid to just want the glory and heroism is a lie anyway.

[Ruadh]

I expect a coherent and lore consistent narrative going into this game 

 

The inclusion of Cerberus is a good idea

 

I will still use the mako to fly off mountains

 

I anticipate my decisions to make a difference in the outcome of the story

 

The micro transaction companion,E.lectric A.lly, will make upgrading my character easier 

 

Combat ready Volus wasn't a really dumb inclusion 

 

Being able to read Conrad Verner's book on Shepard was captivating 

 

I enjoyed the memorial to Joker's beard/one-liners 

 

Absolutely no reference to the previous trilogy's events was an intelligent decision 

[Gothfather]

To answer the threads title question, the person who created this is a new type of troll. There are trolls out now that create false news about things that people are passionate about and submit it as real. False reports on just about any topic are being created. Because the general internet population lacks the ability to exercise any time of discernment they know some people will believe anything. This is why people believe that vaccines cause autism and are so stupid that even if their position was correct which has been proven false it still would be worth vaccinations. We use to have extremely high infant mortality rates like 30% to 50% now they are very low in the developed world under 5% is the norm some well under 5%. So even if vaccines had a 1% chance of autism it would still be worth it to reduce infant morality rates from 30%+ down to 5%. And that is just on the premiss that the nut bars are correct, they are not. The overwhelming evidence is that there is no causation or even correlation between vaccines and autism. Same is true about global warming and the idiots who believe that is a hoax.

 

This all possible from confirmation bias, people already hold a belief about something and they will more readily believe a source if it confirms their beliefs be that that ME:A will suck or that EA is badly managed or that EA is a crap company etc. This is how these new breed of trolls operate how many people can i get to believe this without any collaborating evidence? Can they get it to start trending?

[Commander Rpg]

To answer the threads title question, the person who created this is a new type of troll. There are trolls out now that create false news about things that people are passionate about and submit it as real. False reports on just about any topic are being created. Because the general internet population lacks the ability to exercise any time of discernment they know some people will believe anything. This is why people believe that vaccines cause autism and are so stupid that even if their position was correct which has been proven false it still would be worth vaccinations. We use to have extremely high infant mortality rates like 30% to 50% now they are very low in the developed world under 5% is the norm some well under 5%. So even if vaccines had a 1% chance of autism it would still be worth it to reduce infant morality rates from 30%+ down to 5%. And that is just on the premiss that the nut bars are correct, they are not. The overwhelming evidence is that there is no causation or even correlation between vaccines and autism. Same is true about global warming and the idiots who believe that is a hoax.

 

This all possible from confirmation bias, people already hold a belief about something and they will more readily believe a source if it confirms their beliefs be that that ME:A will suck or that EA is badly managed or that EA is a crap company etc. This is how these new breed of trolls operate how many people can i get to believe this without any collaborating evidence? Can they get it to start trending?

Who cares anyway? The important thing is to spam crap about everything else!

[Catastrophy]

Then say it louder!  We must inspire fear in evil!  Quiet tales of hamsters are foolish, but a man and his hamster that tear evil limb from limb?  That's scary!

The First Rule of Hamster is: You do not talk about Hamster!

[prosthetic soul]

 It's too obtuse.  If I agree with

"I think Mass Effect will be easy for new players to get into." 

 

what does that MEAN?  If I click Strongly disagree, than does that mean I WANT it to be for non RPG fans or what?

 

This is a terrible, TERRIBLE survey. 

[CHRrOME]

 It's too obtuse.  If I agree with

"I think Mass Effect will be easy for new players to get into." 

 

what does that MEAN?  If I click Strongly disagree, than does that mean I WANT it to be for non RPG fans or what?

 

This is a terrible, TERRIBLE survey. 

 

If you agree, I'm assuming it means "newbies would feel confortable picking the game". Basically the same thing they tried (and achieved) with DA:I. Heading more in the "casual" part of the meter. The usual in the industry these days.

 

I'm a bit sick of this tbh. I mean, is not like if it was Half life or something; that if you were to make a Half life 3, you'd have to explain the entire storyline again to the player because the first game came out in 1999 and "new" players weren't even born yet.

[NKnight7]

Hmm, no thanks. Really vague.

[Iakus]

 It's too obtuse.  If I agree with

"I think Mass Effect will be easy for new players to get into." 

 

what does that MEAN?  If I click Strongly disagree, than does that mean I WANT it to be for non RPG fans or what?

It means "I think when I push a button, something awesome is going to happen"  

[Khrystyn]

Given the state of media technology to start false and fake content, I cannot help but think it is incredibly easy for people to create 'official looking' info (such as a poorly done survey), and get immediate attention, especially in this forum where there is such a feverish interest to scrape for ANY tidbits of information regarding Andromeda. I don't think the survey is worthy of consideration, and seems to be a poor excuse to start a new thread. What a waste of time to spend on this. I know I won't be reading it again.

[UniformGreyColor]

To answer the threads title question, the person who created this is a new type of troll. There are trolls out now that create false news about things that people are passionate about and submit it as real. False reports on just about any topic are being created. Because the general internet population lacks the ability to exercise any time of discernment they know some people will believe anything. This is why people believe that vaccines cause autism and are so stupid that even if their position was correct which has been proven false it still would be worth vaccinations. We use to have extremely high infant mortality rates like 30% to 50% now they are very low in the developed world under 5% is the norm some well under 5%. So even if vaccines had a 1% chance of autism it would still be worth it to reduce infant morality rates from 30%+ down to 5%. And that is just on the premiss that the nut bars are correct, they are not. The overwhelming evidence is that there is no causation or even correlation between vaccines and autism. Same is true about global warming and the idiots who believe that is a hoax.

 

This all possible from confirmation bias, people already hold a belief about something and they will more readily believe a source if it confirms their beliefs be that that ME:A will suck or that EA is badly managed or that EA is a crap company etc. This is how these new breed of trolls operate how many people can i get to believe this without any collaborating evidence? Can they get it to start trending?

 

Off topic rant is off topic.