I'm genuinely afraid of you.
No you're not. You're afraid that we're going to be friends and you'll like it. Besides, I have candy
I'm genuinely afraid of you.
No you're not. You're afraid that we're going to be friends and you'll like it. Besides, I have candy
I should go...
I should go...
No Yennefer = Geralt dignity regained.
But seriously, TW3 had some gorgeous npcs. Wish we had that kinda good character design in Andromeda instead of the likes of Diana "Battletoads" Allers.
Corrected for you. On the second statement I agree wholeheartedly.
I'm not against the idea of the main campaign being optionally co-operative. Divinity:OS did that quite well, but even then it wasn't perfect.
A few issues would have to be ironed out for an optional co-op campaign to work, the co-op story would possibly have to be streamlined quite a bit. Look at Borderlands and those games, our characters have no dialogue choices... at all. The only choices we occasionally have is quest rewards.
I'd imagine romances would be the first to go in a co-op campaign- not my loss.
How would dialogue choices work?
How would campaign choices work? (RPS perhaps - kind of worked for D:OS)
Who decides what other companions to take on a mission?
Would combat have to completely rebalanced for two people?
How to deal with one person dropping out.
And a whole lot more things which would lead an under pressure game director to throw his/her hands up in the air and say it ain't worth the trouble. Even the BG games don't work that well co-cooperatively.
I think it's a worthy goal down the line, but probably too soon for MEA, especially as BW seem to have enough trouble with net code as it is.
Corrected for you. On the second statement I agree wholeheartedly.
Nah, you just gotta look beneath the surface and the way I played, Geralt never lost his dignity to begin with. Anyways I prefer the more complex arc of Yen's over the blander sweetness of Triss.
I'd rather see you come...
Nah, you just gotta look beneath the surface and the way I played, Geralt never lost his dignity to begin with. Anyways I prefer the more complex arc of Yen's over the blander sweetness of Triss.
To each his own I guess
To each his own I guess
Yennefer is the best. It also makes makes more sense if you played the other games (Triss is pure evil in the first one) and read a bit in the books
Yennefer is the best. It also makes makes more sense if you played the other games (Triss is pure evil in the first one) and read a bit in the books
Well I disagree entirely but this is not the point of this thread. Let's leave it at that.
I agree. Sinful is awesome! This one kinda reminds me of Bunz... Idk why lol. Perhaps because he always makes alts and threads likes this..
You know. There is something to this. Bunz as alterego of Pierogi... mmm... That could also explain why Pierogi are vehemently avoiding the microphone ... then again Pierogi likes cats, so do sinful.
I have none, The only alt master I like is sinful.
The rest are just annoying.
You are on the wrong path. I am deeply convinced that it is sinful not liking pirogis. Not being gourmet = sinful in my eyes.
You are on the wrong path. I am deeply convinced that it is sinful not liking pirogis. Not being gourmet = sinful in my eyes.
Some also don't like mole's on their upper lips. Yet. There they are.
Some also don't like mole's on their upper lips. Yet. There they are.
I've always been strong against molesting. It leads to nothing but anger and the dark side. I recommend maintaining a good stiff upper lip in all cases.
I've always been strong against molesting. It leads to nothing but anger and the dark side. I recommend maintaining a good stiff upper lip in all cases.
Cindy Crawford made millions out of her mole-lest can be said about others.
Cindy Crawford made millions out of her mole-lest can be said about others.
I like to call it a "beauty spot" and not a "mole" lol. I have a small one on my upper right lip as well ![]()
I like to call it a "beauty spot" and not a "mole" lol. I have a small one on my upper right lip as well
^Corrected that sentence for you then. /assuming you love it.
Where? Where did you correct it???? I don't see anything!!!
Kek- you're pulling my leg again - for all others - watch the smileyWhere? Where did you correct it???? I don't see anything!!!
You have a great point. I used to need my alone time but haven't in a while. I just want to talk about feelings, emotions and deep stuff all the time. Friends, they make fun of my masculinity. GF, just cannot keep up with all the affection. So I'm trying to make more friends to laugh and cry with.
Everyone is trying to be billy badaxe in the MP, no one wants to talk about what's bothering them or going well in their lives, exciting things and secrets.
Now that made me LOL. While I was drinking, thanks a bunch!
No OP I don't get lonely playing solo. I have my work, my friends, my family and my gf for social interactions. I want to be alone while gaming, I don't need other people in my campaign.
In all seriousness I can deal with most of EA issues but THIS stuff (co-op campaign) would be a deal breaker for me and I'm not even joking now. SP and MP should remain separate.
Indeed it would be a deal breaker for me as well as much as I love ME I'd not get Andromeda if it ended up doing it. both modes should be kept seperate. It was badenough that you needed to use MP to raise your EMS originally Bioware need to stay away from doing these things again.
Not sure how it will work out but if you want to play a game that has co-op campaign, I recommend Borderlands.
OP, I suggest you play ARMA 3. It's only a battle simulator. There is no story line, just a mission objective for each mission, and it will unfold as you and other players play your part. Some of you can wander away to share your feelings, while others can go kill things.
Skyrim?
Elder Scrolls but I tend to refer to it as skyrim on line.
This thread reminds me of the days when people would whine about getting invaded in Dark Souls. Good times. :')