So I'm wondering, has Shales's gender been mentioned previously, or maybe this is simply a translation error?
Is Shale a woman?
#1
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 09:15
So I'm wondering, has Shales's gender been mentioned previously, or maybe this is simply a translation error?
#2
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 10:42
#3
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 10:47
Perhaps it's his secret?
#4
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 10:48
#5
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 11:31
#6
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 11:32
#7
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 01:06
#8
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 01:22
Anatomically yes, but it can has any personality.Hylan Dronta wrote...
Shale is an it. Its impossible to have a gender for any construct.
#9
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 02:35
#10
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 02:43
Hmm... Maybe he's gay? Scary! Now that would make perfect sense - they did have to invent something to beat the famous blue alien lesbian sex scene in some other game after all.Shensi wrote...
In the trailer he doesn't sound female. Then again his voice isn't that deep either, which is what I would've expected from a golem. He also cares about his appearance (comment about if the crystals make him look too wide), again really odd for a golem.
Perhaps it's his secret?
#11
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 02:50
#12
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 04:25
LinkShale is an object, not a person. As such there really is no gender to apply. Since golems are "things" I am going to use "It" to describe... well, it. I know some people will say "he" (a few may even say she, I guess), but I am calling it "It".
Modifié par Althernai, 15 octobre 2009 - 04:26 .
#13
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 06:16
#14
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 08:01
It's possible for a construct to be biologically male or female, you'd just have to create them to reproduce sexually. Even if they weren't created that way, it's still possible for them to have gender.Hylan Dronta wrote...
Shale is an it. Its impossible to have a gender for any construct.
#15
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 08:02
He's not the offical word on the matter though.Ralsar wrote...
Official word is official
#16
Posté 15 octobre 2009 - 10:30
Modifié par Purple Lady, 15 octobre 2009 - 10:31 .
#17
Posté 16 octobre 2009 - 02:46
#18
Posté 16 octobre 2009 - 02:57
Althernai wrote...
No, Chris said that Shale doesn't have any gender (and not just anatomically)LinkShale is an object, not a person. As such there really is no gender to apply. Since golems are "things" I am going to use "It" to describe... well, it. I know some people will say "he" (a few may even say she, I guess), but I am calling it "It".
Shale gonna pwned you if "IT" knew what you wrote.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
#19
Posté 16 octobre 2009 - 08:35
Terry Pratchett disagrees.Hylan Dronta wrote...
Shale is an it. Its impossible to have a gender for any construct.
http://wiki.lspace.org/wiki/Gladys
For that matter, any reputable psychologist would disgree as well, as gender is an entirely mental construct .
Modifié par Ravenshrike, 16 octobre 2009 - 08:38 .
#20
Posté 17 octobre 2009 - 03:44
#21
Posté 17 octobre 2009 - 05:45
Does there have to be a point, beyond increasing character depth and the story? Because those two things seem like extremely crucial components of any novel, game or film, to me.Purple Lady wrote...
Since Shale's quest, as I remember, is to help it to "humanize", maybe it will develop some gender. But I doubt it, I don't see the point (story wise) in giving a gender to Shale (romance is NOT an option)
#22
Posté 17 octobre 2009 - 05:52
He says he remembers being called "Lord Shale" , if it were a female wouldn't it be "Lady Shale".
#23
Posté 18 octobre 2009 - 12:54
Of course, the fact that "prisoner" has two gendered forms and the feminine is selected is suggestive. Is the word used to translate "golem" in Russian masculine, feminine, or neuter? If it's feminine, that could be the source of the selection.
Modifié par Srikandi715, 18 octobre 2009 - 12:56 .
#24
Posté 18 octobre 2009 - 02:27
Same goes for Dog. The minute I saw his video all those months back, I just automatically started referring to the mutt as 'he'. The same will probably apply here, to Shale.
#25
Posté 18 octobre 2009 - 07:16
The word golem is masculine. The closest analogy I can think of is the word lioness - while a lion can be of any gender, lioness is specifically a female lion. So is the female version of the word prisoner in russian, it can only mean a female prisoner.Srikandi715 wrote...
Russian is a grammatical gender language. That means that all nouns have gender, whether they refer to humans or not. Therefore, in a language like Russian, the fact that Shale is referred to by a feminine pronoun doesn't necessarily mean it is having human gender characteristics assigned to it, any more than the fact that "book" is feminine in Russian does.
Of course, the fact that "prisoner" has two gendered forms and the feminine is selected is suggestive. Is the word used to translate "golem" in Russian masculine, feminine, or neuter? If it's feminine, that could be the source of the selection.
Plus, the name Shale is localised to Sheila - which is obviously a female name.





Retour en haut







