What exactly is Reaper indoctrination? That is, what does a person experience as the indoctrination process progresses? Saren believed that he needed to forge an alliance between organics and the Reapers, but wasn't sure if he really believed that, or if Sovereign had planted the idea in his mind. It wasn't until he was somehow convinced to put the implants in his body that Sovereign completely dominated his mind. And yet, he could still have a moment of clarity and shoot himself.
The Illusive Man: At what point was he indoctrinated? Until the very end, he fully believed that the Reapers could be controlled... and he was right. The biggest problem was that he also implanted himself with Reaper technology, and the Reapers would have never allowed him to actually seize control; they could do anything to his body. And yet, just like Saren, he could be persuaded to see the flaws in his logic, and choose to shoot himself.
Is indoctrination supposed to tie into some overall theme? It's interesting that we're introduced to the Thorian before we learn about Reaper indoctrination; the methods are similar, although not exactly the same. And we can't ignore the Indoctrination Theory, which makes indoctrination itself the final obstacle to overcome. But the problem is that indoctrination is a physical process, not just a psychological one. An actual signal affects a person's brain and influences their thinking. Also, isn't it ironic to declare that the destruction of the Reapers is the only valid solution? Isn't the person who makes this claim "indoctrinated", believing that no other solution is viable? Even the Illusive Man suggests this possibility on Thessia, stating that Shepard could be indoctrinated into fighting a war that can't be won, and ignoring the very real chance to control the Reapers. Of course, he's invalidated because he actually was the indoctrinated one.
I suppose I'm just confused about this indoctrination thing. I'm not sure if it has any thematic point. Like, is indoctrination supposed to be the belief that the Reapers, in some way that varies from person to person, are needed? Is it supposed to be a hopeless nihilism, some kind of Lovecraftian realization that the universe is so bleak that it drives you to madness? It could be argued that indoctrination itself is the Reapers; it represents the "hope" that they can combat the chaos of a meaningless universe, but in ways that are beyond the comprehension, or approval, of people like us. Thus, the madness comes from both the physical degenerative process and the inability to comprehend the Reapers and their purpose.
So is that why Shepard was "special"? His/her will was so strong, so superhuman, that he/she represented an evolution that resisted the madness of indoctrination? Perhaps a symbol of the inevitable collapse of the Catalysts' cycle, like the keepers' evolution to respond only to the Citadel's original signal? Shepard is proof that the Reapers are knowable, and indoctrination has no power over him/her. A man or woman who can embrace the terror of an unknown Cosmos, and prove that the Reapers are obsolete. At least, that is what I would like to believe.





Back to top







