And I'm still kinda mad about that to. Why are they the only ones ************ especially Sera. Cullen I understand, but Sera!!! It really didn't fit her character at all.
P.S I'm a Cassshipper
Well, since this thread is already derailed, I guess I'll pile on.
I have to disagree. I think the Trespasser conclusion to Seraship makes perfect sense. Is it corny, mawkish and kind of a cynical play for feels? Sure, but I enjoyed it anyway. Out of character? No.
The IQ's romance in the main game is portrayed as a major turning point in Sera's life. All her goofy, vulgar, just-for-fun frolics before that point didn't mean anything. The relationship with your IQ does. A lot of romcoms start out with a character that is a feckless dog that chases from bed to bed, but with a gaping hole in their heart that can't be filled up with all the frolicking. Then some LI comes along and changes their whole life. They fill up the emptiness. That's the Sera story all over. Totally formula really, so it's no surprise that the Trespasser handling of the conclusion is just as formulaic.
As to why no other romance gets special treatment, let's run them down. No Trespasser spoilers.
TL;DR - I agree that something could have been done with Dorian and Blackwall, maybe Josie too -- at the risk of doing a half-assed job -- but the rest are either rule-outs or too costly because the character can be in multiple states in Trespasser.
Cassandra: There's an obvious opportunity to portray a break-up, either because she's Divine and being pressured to give up the relationship and is ready to quit the Starburst Throne all on account of your IQ, so you dump her for her own good, or because she's rebooting the Seekers or Templars and feels guilty about not spending enough time with your IQ, so she dumps you. But you see the problem, right? Because Cass can be in two different states, that's two completely different romance conclusions they'd have to script, develop and test. Too expensive.
Iron Bull: Well, it's obvious why this one can't be done. No spoilers.
Dorian: Okay, here I think you have a point. Unless you booted him out of the Inquisition, Dorian is only in one state at the start of Trespasser, so there shouldn't be a problem with doing some kind of romance conclusion for him. Arguably, the way he plans to tie up his loose ends in Tevinter preclude anything permanent (no spoilers), but that's kind of weak. Some kind of big last farewell break-up would have been both fitting and economical.
Josie: Josie already gets a special scene regardless of your romance status with her. Maybe that could have been elaborated, or something tacked on the end if she was your LI, but that really wouldn't do the Disney-princess romance justice. Again, here, I think the argument against is cost.
Solas: hah!
Blackwall: It's remotely possible Blackwall could be in two states (Revelations or no Revelations), but who completes a romance with Blackwall without doing Revelations? So theoretically it could have been done on the assumption Revelations happened. You could even retcon Revelations happening in the 2 gap years, if you didn't complete the quest in the main game. So there's really no reason not to do something about this in Trespasser. Could be a break-up, could be some form of absolution by way of romance.