This phrasing isn't going to be pleasant, I fully acknowledge that, but I think directness is required. The view here seems to be that Mae would be taking the place of a full woman in terms of the LI options. I don't think that would be the case, actually. If anything, she might get her own category because of this concern.
I can sort of understand where the person is coming from, particularly considering the game's setting since there is no transition surgery. Some people are going to be attracted to a particular gender, and that includes ALL aspects of that gender. Some people can move past that, or don't consider it important, and others can't and do consider it important.
Maevaris dresses like a woman, acts like a woman, is a woman is her very soul, but is not physically a woman, just as Krem is not physically a man. That IS going to matter to some people in terms of the romance options.
I understand. This is a difficult subject, isn't it? Because on one hand I acknowledge what you said, but on the other, having her as a separate option just rubs me the wrong way on principle, since it's basically saying that she's different and needs to be an extra/alternate option because she'll never be good enough for some people, and that undermines any inclusivity they are trying to convey. Hopefully that makes sense.
Part of me also gets depressed that she wouldn't even be good enough in a video game romance, where we can be almost 100% certain there will be no explicit scenes with her and where she is for all intents and purposes the same as other options. I went out of my comfort zone to romance Cullen because I like his personality, with no attraction to him whatsoever otherwise, and I enjoyed the romance for the romance. Couldn't people do the same for Mae, if they really liked her character? Just thinking outloud here.
What is "well enough"? That is going to be an individual preference. I am totally bonkers about the Dorian romance, all aspects of it, including the way it plays out in Trespasser. But there are many who were not are are bitter about it, and the character is tainted for them because of it.
As far as bigots are concerned, Bioware has shown that they are happy to give them the finger. By now, players familiar with the company know what Bioware is about and how they view things. They'll either accept it and move on, or they won't.
I'd also suggest that Maevaris is the perfect character to attempt this with. She already has a fanbase from her appearance in the comics and is known to be trans (yes, I get that this won't be the case for new players). There will never be a right time for Bioware to take such a leap. This will be a controversial choice whenever it happens.
A good question. I know it'll be different for everyone, just like some people were satisfied with how Krem was presented and some weren't. Personally, there were aspects of how they handled Krem I thought they could have done better, and hope they do with Mae. I just want them to not have her being trans be a big/important issue like it was for Krem and Dorian's homosexuality was for him*. I think that's the less effective way to be inclusive. Don't get me wrong, I like Krem and Dorian, it's not about that.
I agree that she's definitely a great opportunity and Bioware should totally include her as a major character. I'm just not 100% on if she should be romance option. If Bioware decides to make her one, you won't hear any complaining from me, it's just that whole "depressing" thing I mentioned above making me wary.
*By "important issue" I meant making a big deal of it ingame/-story, not that it shouldn't be important to the characters themselves.
Judging by Weekes' snide comments against the fanbase regarding the issue, I believe that Tilani's appearance in the next game is pretty much confirmed.
My opinion? I think Tilani is overshadowed by Pavus. Dorian is the leader of the Lucerni. He is an established character already. He has at least some connection with the (ex)Inquisitor. He might have some connection with any other returning characters. He's a mage.
So Tilani really has no role to play in the storyline that Dorian can't play himself. I wouldn't want Tilani to appear as anything other than some NPC. The one and only card Tilani has to play is the family connection to the dwarven Ambassadoria, which might tie in to Kal-Sharok somehow. But still, that's only cause for an NPC appearance.
That's not really the best argument to be made against having a companion, even if it held water (though I'm not convinced it does). Most of the companions in DA are not overly important to the plot, and some have overlap. If that's also true for Mae (which I doubt), well, so what?
As for this discussion on Tilani being a romance option...
Look, let's be honest here. Tilani would be gated to bisexual male characters by default. Tilani is attracted to males, which rules out all female characters. Tilani is biologically male, but tries to look like a female. Heterosexual male characters will want someone who is biologically female. Homosexual male characters will want someone who looks like a male.
That's actually not how it works in real life, believe it or not.
Also take origin story into account. Why would Tilani start a relationship with a male who does not have power, wealth, or influence? Why would a male of a family with power, wealth, and influence want to start a relationship with someone he can't reproduce with?
Too many obstacles, too little demand.
That... is a very odd thing to say in regards to a roleplaying game. There are plenty of people in real life (and therefore RP options ingame) who are neutral or don't want to have kids, and that's also ignoring adoption, which would be in high-demand in Thedas right about now.
And something similar goes for Maevaris. People marry for love all the time, which is why she was in a relationship with a dwarf. Also, she's already very wealthy, so that's basically a non-issue anyway. And who's to say our character won't have power, wealth, and influence in DA4? In fact, I'd say it's more likely that they will than not.