We don't know that the cities literally fell from the sky; just that they fell into ruins, that could have happened at ground level.
Why not both? There were some cities in the sky, as Solas claims. I mean, he could be lying but why would he lie about that? So these fell or were trapped in the Crossroads and deteriorated, and there were obviously cities on the ground as well, which the titans were shaking to ruin, which is why Mythal and others had to do something about them. Also, the Veil being spread to those areas is described as "The Fall" by the Spirit of Learning in the Vir Dirthara.
Plus the humans were probably only in localised areas, remote from the main centres of civilisation of the elves so would not have witnessed these things happen.
I agree.
However, they did come across the ruins fairly quickly because it was only 50 years after the advent of the Quickening that the humans first started hearing whispers from the Fade and I'd have a fair guess it was in the region of the old elven ruins.
Maybe, but Abelas makes it sound like the elvhen who survived The Fall ended up warring with each other and killing each other off for the most part. The humans only found the ruins and picked the bones clean.
Still, I think the main question is if any humans were able to enter parts of the world where the Veil did not cover. We they blocked by physical barriers? Was the malleable existence of the Crossroads too much for them to handle? Did the Fade energies distort their perceptions somehow, or was their consciousness able to perceive that reality? We already know that non-elves cannot see all the colors in the Crossroads, nor can they see certain creations such as flowers.
Dorian says there are pictures of ancient Tevinter dreamers with Foci like those of the elves in pictures in Minrathous. Unfortunately, until we get more information there is no way of knowing the date these pictures were meant to represent. One thing Patrick Weekes confirmed is that many of the later Tevinter cities were built over old elven ruins and I wouldn't mind betting this was because of the residual magic there. It may even be that humans rummaging around in elven ruins discovered shrines to elven gods, depicted in their dragon form and this gave them the idea that the gods look like dragons. However, if they had actually seen the elven gods flying around as dragons, this would make even more sense.
Building cities over elvhen ruins makes sense if the elvhen cities existed in the gaps that allowed the Crossroads dimension to be interacted with. When Solas closed the gaps by either pulling the Veil in or creating an artificial Veil himself, it left those areas with a thinner Veil than parts of Thedas that always had the Veil in place. The result would be that magic was more abundant in those places.
As for the dragons, I don't think the evanuris and the old gods are connected. I'm sure they interacted back in the old days, but I think the old gods were more like a rival organization of false gods, and I think the old gods were more powerful than the evanuris.
As for the Chant being wrong disproving the Maker, that is not strictly the case. We only have their word for it that what is contained in it actually are Andraste's words about the Maker. There are numerous different bits to the Chant that date to different eras, some well after Andraste died and so only passed on through oral tradition, which became mixed in with local folk lore. The Canticle of Shartan is like this so why shouldn't the other bits of the Chant be the same. You cannot say that the Chant is divinely inspired when the Divines have played fast and loose with its content, adding and taking away from it as they saw fit.
Okay, but there's a difference between a verse that condemns bringing harm to the defenseless and a verse that clearly says the Maker is responsible for certain actions. If the Maker didn't create the world, then there is no Maker. If the Maker didn't speak to Andraste and help her fight Tevinter, then there is no Maker. If the Maker did not curse the Magisters, then there is no Maker. The Chant identifies that universe's deity as a being who did this, that, and the other thing. So if evidence arises that shows this is untrue, it means the claims made in the Chant are baseless and just made-up ideas. There could still be one true deity in the DA universe, but it wouldn't be the one that the Chant describes.
What I would assert is that all the revelations in DAI and its DLC, including the true history of Andraste, have pretty much disproved the Chantry is a divinely inspired organisation.
I disagree that the DLCs proved anything of the sort, but I do understand that the Chantry itself is not divinely inspired. According to the Chant and the Guardian, the Maker spoke only to Andraste. After they burned her, the Maker left mankind to its fate, and the Chant has been guesswork ever since. However, to the best of my knowledge, the parts of the Chant dealing with the creation of the world were all from Andraste.
No surprise there considering how people respond to the revelations concerning the true origin of the Herald's mark; apparently truth is not so important as inspiring the masses. I was stating I was Andrastrian but not a follower of the Chantry back in DAO. This feeling was only reinforced in DA2 and confirmed in DAI. Which is why I was so incensed that my only options at the end of Trespasser were to either disband the Inquisition or put it under the control of the Divine and thus the Chantry, just as the first Inquisition had been. As a result I preferred to disband.
Trespasser gave us no choices. Both endings are essentially the same. My choice came down to the fact that my Inquisitor is a mage. If he disbanded, he would be just another mage who had to go back to the Circle. At least this way he is allowed to act as an agent in the outside world.
The Maker can neither be proven nor disproven; the writers have claimed they do not intend doing so. Considering a fundamental of Chantry teaching is that he has turned his back on the world and will not respond until it suits him to do so (everyone sings the Chant), what does it matter if he does exist? He's not stepping in to help any time soon.
The concept of God will never be proven or disproven in the DA universe, but that's different from saying the Maker will never be proven or disproven. As for why its important, I think it would be for those living in Thedas. They believe he does not intervene in their world, while some believe he does, but all Andrastians believe that he accepts them to his side when they die so long as they are faithful.
If he should suddenly pop up and say "Hi", I'll be only too happy to be proven wrong. Let's face it, apart from a few dialogue choices, it made precious little difference if we were committed believers or not in DAI.
Eh, roleplaying is serious business. I think being able to show faith was an important aspect of the game, especially if a mage, and especially if romancing Cassandra.
Was it in DAO or Neverwinter Nights where if you prayed at an altar to one of the elven gods and you weren't their worshiper, you got zapped?
Now that is the sort of thing I am talking about. May be the next time you take coins from the offering at a local shrine. Strangely enough, if you desecrate the altar of Dumat in Legacy, you do get attacked. What is that meant to tell us?
The only part in DA:O that was anything close to that was the elven temple where the werewolves were. You gain access to the burial chamber with the Juggernaut armor by doing the ritual in the proper sequence. Anyone can do it, but you have to do it right. A wrong move will make Shades appear.
That demons watch over the Altar of Dumat.