Why did not they say no? I just said: the temptation affects everyone.
They didn't refuse because they were pressured and forced by corrupted leadership, Envy demon and Lucius.
Eee, what you said is redundant considered that i agreed but pointed fact that there would be no red templars if not a mage that actions and plans caused spread of red lyrium.So once again, Templars aren't more dangerous than a normal person despite being susceptible to temptation as people.
This is true. Templars aren't fit to fight demons because they're easily tricked by them (Envy), apparently pretty easy to possess (every surviving Templar seen in Broken Circle besides Cullen, and a few in Kirkwall), and too cowardly to actually try (Gregoir cowering at the bottom of the tower, Meredith deciding to slaughter innocent, non-possessed mages instead of the demons in the city).
That is fallacy , if Templars aren't fit to fight demons on that basis no one is, because there is no single person that could tell that it was Envy Demon.Plus, if i recall those templars weren't possessed only mind-controlled, what only means not every templar can effectively resist or can resist forever.
If you consider common sense cowardice sure, what Greagoir did prevented abomnations from getting outisde and dying in suicidal charge that would lead to demons geting out would be against what of templar stand for, that is protecting world from mages.
Meredith invoked RoA what is elimination of the circle because every mage can be either possessed or a blood mage, she had good basis to do that considering that circle mages constantly turn out to be either blood mages or abomnations.