YESSSSSS, I'm religious and non-cognitivist! Beware!!!!!!!
A non-cognitivist! You rebel!
YESSSSSS, I'm religious and non-cognitivist! Beware!!!!!!!
A non-cognitivist! You rebel!
I would have at the whole Asari species, trust me.
Pants off party?
Can someon bring some lemons? We could make it a lemon party.
A non-cognitivist! You rebel!
Conformists.
The ****?! How bout we keep our pants and tops on. Can't see anything anyway.
Well I see I have no place here.Bruh, for all you (we) know, it's been a shirtless, pantless lemon party from the start.
Bruh, for all you (we) know, it's been a shirtless, pantless lemon party from the start.
When life gives you lemons, you make a lemon party.
The ****?! How bout we keep our pants and tops on. Can't see anything anyway.
Says the guy with a shirtless pic as his avatar =P
Says the guy with a shirtless pic as his avatar =P
Stop body shaming. #freethenips
That's Bruce Lee boi.Says the guy with a shirtless pic as his avatar =P
That's Bruce Lee boi.
It's still a shirtless pic.
Just not one of you.
Nope.It's still a shirtless pic.
Just not one of you.
I would argue that a religious system needs a reasoned basis to carry any prescriptive force.Though he doesn't really need one. He can just go non-cognitivist, or religious, or some other non-reasoned system.
Stop body shaming. #freethenips
When life gives you lemons, you make a lemon party.
I'm going to go ahead and take a few of these *grabs some lemons* to bake-up some lemon loafs.
wew


Even to a believer?I would argue that a religious system needs a reasoned basis to carry any prescriptive force.
Well, sure, they're not arguments. But whether there's a point depends on what you're trying to accomplish.And non-cognitivist statements are meaningless statements, so there's really no point making them.
Even to a believer?
Surely you don't think all believers agree in their interpretation of divine will? Even if they belong to the same religion, nay, the same denomination?
No. Promiscuity is inmoral. That's why I don't want it. Promiscuity is an UNHEALTHY lifestyle. Why the frak do you want me to like it?????? Go romance Iron Bull, Zevran and Isabela if that's what makes you hot. I don't care if you do it, just don't expect everyone to agree with your lifestyle.
DA and ME are not even 70 % of my liking, and GUESS WHAT, I play THE HECK out of them. Think again.
I see a lot of people kind of dismissing Zevran as the 'promiscuous bisexual' of the series. Honestly I never saw that. Granted he starts out real flirty with the Warden but if you do his romance path you see that the character goes a lot deeper than that.
Most if the characters he has slept with in the past were his assassination targets, sex was often just part of the job for him. If your Warden romances him and chooses to sacrifice themselves, the ending slide says he never loved again. He's also the only romance option who stays with the Warden no matter what.
I'm still of the (unpopular) opinion that Zev is the best romance option in the DA series. Plus he sounds like Puss in Boots.
Surely you don't think all believers agree in their interpretation of divine will? Even if they belong to the same religion, nay, the same denomination?
Oh, not at all. But the precepts of a religion have some influence, at least in the long term. Works both ways, I guess, since a successful religion picks up stuff that's popular with the masses.
Liike Starburst and Pogs.
What happened to this thread? Everyone is talking about LGBT or other nonsense instead of polyamory...Don't change, BSN.
What happened to this thread? Everyone is talking about LGBT or other nonsense instead of polyamory...Don't change, BSN.
Ironically bringing my point about Bioware being an LGBT not a poly/whatever type to the fore...
When life gives you lemons, you make a lemon party.
No, when life gives you lemons, you EAT the lemons, that way life will know that you are crazy and to leave you alone. ![]()
*Grab a lemon and eat all of it*
![]()
The odds of a character just happening to recruit enough party members for there to be more than ONE specific polyamorous option are about the same as successfully navigating an asteroid field.
To be blunt: I prefer a cast of characters who all have their own set orientations, and I very much like it when there's a diverse set of orientations among them. None of that Dragon Age II "either gender can romance anyone" half-assing crap that sidesteps diversity without actually addressing it. But that applies to general sexual preferences, too. A character should have the right not to want a polyamorous relationship as much as they should have the right to want it or be okay with it.
In short... yeah, sure, as long as it doesn't turn the thing into a goddang harem manga simulator.