638 réponses à ce sujet

[Drakoriz]

That would depend on whether your Krogan squadmate Drack is gay or not. 

 

hmmmmm i really doubt a gay Krogan can exits, on their type of culture. It doesnt fit really.

[Drakoriz]

I am not saying copy them, but learn from how they do quests.

 

Finding 20 bear hides doesn't do it anymore.

 

And Dark Souls III is far from a crowning achievement. They too are getting complacent over at From Soft

 

And Witcher 3 is full with tedious quest too. Really in your eyes Witcher 3 is the best of the best of the best. When really isnt. Is far from been that.

 

Most Witcher 3 fans are becoming blind like that...... and isnt a good sign. 

[SKAR]

That would depend on whether your Krogan squadmate Drack is gay or not.

Bisexual Krogan? Interspecies relations? The Iron Bull was and he was like a dragon age Krogan. Who would win in a fight? A Krogan or quinari?

[SKAR]

hmmmmm i really doubt a gay Krogan can exits, on their type of culture. It doesnt fit really.

Really? People say that about our culture. It doesn't matter on a culture. An individual has the right to be whatever they want to be.

[Drakoriz]

Really? People say that about our culture. It doesn't matter on a culture.

 

i mean base on a culture that prize reproduction, and make Leader the male that can reproduce (or at least before the Genephade cure) i doubt they will tolerate a gay member, that maybe can be fertile or no.

 

The quon is different that the Krogan culture. The quon prize work so you can bang whatever you want female male, animals whatever, if that doenst interface with your work. Rememeber that Iron Bull tell you they have this girls boys they can go and bang after a mission to release stress, that thier only job on the quou is to do that.

 

Sorry i keep misspelling Quoun or whatever i dont remember how to write it.

[txgoldrush]

And Witcher 3 is full with tedious quest too. Really in your eyes Witcher 3 is the best of the best of the best. When really isnt. Is far from been that.

 

Most Witcher 3 fans are becoming blind like that...... and isnt a good sign. 

By story direction, quest writing, and willing to think outside the box, TW3 is best of the best.

 

They aren't blind, they are right.

[Dalakaar]

 Witcher 3 is the best of the best of the best. When really isnt. Is far from been that.

You'll tell someone their best of the best of the best isn't...

 

Will you tell us what your best of the best of the best is though?

[Cyonan]

Not really, Witcher 3 has some good diversity when it comes to fighting styles and ways to engage enemies. I was mostly playing a signs build and it's not really just countering and attacking. Different enemies are vulnerable to different things, like igni for a griffin and yrden to make a golem slower.

 

An alchemy build is just as fun but quite different as you can run a ton of potions and decoctions at once and have access to some big bombs which can act as one of your primary sources of damage. And a swords build is mostly dependent on sword damage and weapon skills. Also the beastiary helps a lot with how you deal with enemies and can make a hell of a difference in a fight. It does have it faults however in that it gets rather easy after the beginning even on Death march and the hit boxes leave much to be desired. But overall I found the combat pretty engaging.

 

But if you're looking at the core gameplay of just attacking and counter attacking, the same can be said of almost every other game. Even in mass effect all you do is just take cover, shoot/use your powers and repeat. 

 

I'm not saying there aren't differences at all, I'm just saying they're very minimal.

 

Yeah a magic build can break blocks instead of countering them or just spam Igni. So can a sword build, they simply have lower numbers.

 

The whole "enemies are weak to specific things" thing is cool considering the whole witcher angle but against a golem I'm going to use Yrden regardless of what build I have and use the appropriate oils on my weapons.

 

No build really provides new and unique mechanics. The closest they get is a bit of a change to how the sign works in the magic tree. It's not the worst thing I've ever seen, but I'd still consider it fair criticism of the game's combat.

 

In either case it's gotten horribly off topic because people always feel the need to defend against criticism. My original point was that the OP is acting like TW3 is god's gift to gaming while talking about how other people overpraise games like DA:O. I merely brought up the combat because they tried to dismiss my point as any flaws the game has as "not key flaws".

[SKAR]

i mean base on a culture that prize reproduction, and make Leader the male that can reproduce (or at least before the Genephade cure) i doubt they will tolerate a gay member, that maybe can be fertile or no.

The quon is different that the Krogan culture. The quon prize work so you can bang whatever you want female male, animals whatever, if that doenst interface with your work. Rememeber that Iron Bull tell you they have this girls boys they can go and bang after a mission to release stress, that thier only job on the quou is to do that.

Sorry i keep misspelling Quoun or whatever i dont remember how to write it.

Doesnt mean there aren't gay Krogan. Did you know there are nice Krogan? But how can that be if they are a savage race. Didn't mean to mock you, just saying.

[Tactical striga]

I'm not saying there aren't differences at all, I'm just saying they're very minimal.

 

Yeah a magic build can break blocks instead of countering them or just spam Igni. So can a sword build, they simply have lower numbers.

 

The whole "enemies are weak to specific things" thing is cool considering the whole witcher angle but against a golem I'm going to use Yrden regardless of what build I have and use the appropriate oils on my weapons.

 

No build really provides new and unique mechanics. The closest they get is a bit of a change to how the sign works in the magic tree. It's not the worst thing I've ever seen, but I'd still consider it fair criticism of the game's combat.

 

In either case it's gotten horribly off topic because people always feel the need to defend against criticism. My original point was that the OP is acting like TW3 is god's gift to gaming while talking about how other people overpraise games like DA:O. I merely brought up the combat because they tried to dismiss my point as any flaws the game has as "not key flaws".

What matters most imo, is that a person simply enjoys whatever game they own, i know people who wont even touch Fallout 2 because its turn based or "ugly" if i enjoy a game enough ill look past its flaws, (even though i try so hard to not die from ME-1 combat)

[Drakoriz]

You'll tell someone their best of the best of the best isn't...

 

Will you tell us what your best of the best of the best is though?

 

a game?????? really i dont think i can choose one. I like different game for different reason.

 

Lets see i love Witcher 3 for their rich story. ME franchise bc the setting in general.

 

Fallout/ES games bc they do a excellent job making interesting places to explore.

 

hmmm WOW bc i really love how that game have grow over the years expanding a lore on way i never imagine (bad and good ways)

 

Really is hard to things on a game that is the best of the best of the best and is perfect.

 

By story direction, quest writing, and willing to think outside the box, TW3 is best of the best.

 

They aren't blind, they are right.

 

By this state make me think he is just a blind fan......

 

I know ME game have story issues like some part feel disconnect but over all it make sense and the paid out was decent.

Fallout is full with issues but exploration was good, and keep me interesting.

Same goes for ES games.

I will not name the issues with WoW since they chance with each expasion and patch -.-, but over all i been playing that game for over 10 years. soooo yeahhhh.

Witcher 3 is great i love it. But combat is repetitive, and the world is detail and all but it isnt interesting to explore since the maps are full with the same Monster nest and chest, or Bandy camps.

 

Each game is Unique and strong and weak on their own.

[Teabaggin Krogan]

I am not saying copy them, but learn from how they do quests ahd how they connect characters and side material with the main plot, which Bioware actually did in DA2 and ME3.

 

Finding 20 bear hides doesn't do it anymore.

 

And Dark Souls III is far from a crowning achievement. They too are getting complacent over at From Soft. Also they are not in the same category. The Soulsborne games are modern Ultima Underworlds, not full blown RPGs.

 

I'll admit, better side quests are welcome but the comparison isn't really fair since ME3 came out in 2012 and that's a long time ago in video game land. Besides the Witcher has it's share of silly side quests and tediousness. Are you sure your judgement isn't clouded with fanboyism?

 

Also TW3 isn't a full blown rpg either, you can only be geralt and a witcher however varied you may claim witchers are. Personally I prefer Dark Souls 3 or bloodborne to TW3 and consider them to have better environments, stories and gameplay but the important point here is that it's my preference and not a concrete fact. 

 

 

By story direction, quest writing, and willing to think outside the box, TW3 is best of the best.

 

They aren't blind, they are right.

[txgoldrush]

I'm not saying there aren't differences at all, I'm just saying they're very minimal.

 

Yeah a magic build can break blocks instead of countering them or just spam Igni. So can a sword build, they simply have lower numbers.

 

The whole "enemies are weak to specific things" thing is cool considering the whole witcher angle but against a golem I'm going to use Yrden regardless of what build I have and use the appropriate oils on my weapons.

 

No build really provides new and unique mechanics. The closest they get is a bit of a change to how the sign works in the magic tree. It's not the worst thing I've ever seen, but I'd still consider it fair criticism of the game's combat.

 

In either case it's gotten horribly off topic because people always feel the need to defend against criticism. My original point was that the OP is acting like TW3 is god's gift to gaming while talking about how other people overpraise games like DA:O. I merely brought up the combat because they tried to dismiss my point as any flaws the game has as "not key flaws".

DAO is overpraised. Lets count the ways.

 

1) The story is generic, Bioware formula, with characters that are generic Bioware formula outside of maybe Shale and Leliana.

2) The combat system is utterly unbalanced and broken. Any game that lets you wreck solo as a mage in a party based game is broken.

3) The art style and graphics are basically PS2 and Xbox quality. Even NWN2 and TW1 looks better.

4) the story lacks focus, its basically four big side stories in the middle of the plot donut.

[Drakoriz]

Doesnt mean there aren't gay Krogan. Did you know there are nice Krogan? But how can that be if they are a savage race. Didn't mean to mock you, just saying.

 

hmm you right, i guess i was looking it with a more logically point of view. Like really i dont think they can give the luxury of choose not to try to reproduce (ofcurse all this on a non or before cure universe) . But you right.

[Drakoriz]

DAO is overpraised. Lets count the ways.

 

1) The story is generic, Bioware formula, with characters that are generic Bioware formula outside of maybe Shale and Leliana.

2) The combat system is utterly unbalanced and broken. Any game that lets you wreck solo as a mage in a party based game is broken.

3) The art style and graphics are basically PS2 and Xbox quality. Even NWN2 and TW1 looks better.

4) the story lacks focus, its basically four big side stories in the middle of the plot donut.

 

LOL are you in a campaign to make every game been like Witcher games..........

 

This and the other post just probe you are acting like fanboy.

[txgoldrush]

I'll admit, better side quests are welcome but the comparison isn't really fair since ME3 came out in 2012 and that's a long time ago in video game land. Besides the Witcher has it's share of silly side quests and tediousness. Are you sure your judgement isn't clouded with fanboyism?

 

Also TW3 isn't a full blown rpg either, you can only be geralt and a witcher however varied you may claim witchers are. Personally I prefer Dark Souls 3 or bloodborne to TW3 and consider them to have better environments, stories and gameplay but the important point here is that it's my preference and not a concrete fact. 

 

 

Sure, TW3 may have a couple tedious side quest and they do have some very silly ones, but you cannot question the sheer amount of quality side quest lines with production values and attention to detail the main game has, with many playing a role in the main story. And they did not weaken the main story to do this like a Bethesda game would.

 

But its still an RPG and it does choice and consequence better than almost all Bioware games with only really ME3 and maybe BGII (on the gameplay and party composition side more than story) being an equal.

 

Dark Souls III is a broken mess and easily the weakest Soulsborne game. Its PvP is so bad, the covenants are so broken, the areas are recycled from past games, most of the bosses are complete rips from past games, its more linear than ever. I can go on. It is no where near the quality of Scholar of the First Sin.

[Cyonan]

What matters most imo, is that a person simply enjoys whatever game they own, i know people who wont even touch Fallout 2 because its turn based or "ugly" if i enjoy a game enough ill look past its flaws, (even though i try so hard to not die from ME-1 combat)

 

In general I would agree that people should enjoy what they want. I think KotoR has the worst combat I've ever seen in a video game but if somebody enjoys that? It's not hurting me.

 

and I do think TW3 is a great game. Though it's a forum, and I'll throw out criticisms of any game if I feel it's appropriate =P Like I said when I got into a discussion about Baldur's Gate, I'll even criticize Half-Life 1 and it's my favourite game of all time.

 

DAO is overpraised. Lets count the ways.

 

1) The story is generic, Bioware formula, with characters that are generic Bioware formula outside of maybe Shale and Leliana.

2) The combat system is utterly unbalanced and broken. Any game that lets you wreck solo as a mage in a party based game is broken.

3) The art style and graphics are basically PS2 and Xbox quality. Even NWN2 and TW1 looks better.

4) the story lacks focus, its basically four big side stories in the middle of the plot donut.

 

I'm not actually saying DA:O isn't over praised.

 

I'm saying you're being a hypocrite for calling other people out for over praising it while you yourself are over praising the Witcher games.

 

Because I actually largely agree with points 1, 2, and 4. However, I could start pointing out a lot of things the game also did exceedingly well.

 

Most good games are over praised at some point.

[txgoldrush]

LOL are you in a campaign to make every game been like Witcher games..........

 

This and the other post just probe you are acting like fanboy.

Better for Bioware to leave the formula.

 

Like it or not, TW3 is the bar when it comes to the genre right now. I am not saying to copy it but learn from it.

 

And really, DA2 and ME3 already have done what I praise TW3 for doing.

[Drakoriz]

Better for Bioware to leave the formula.

 

Like it or not, TW3 is the bar when it comes to the genre right now. I am not saying to copy it but learn from it.

 

And really, DA2 and ME3 already have done what I praise TW3 for doing.

 

LOL TW3 isnt the bar for anything........

 

 /sigh..........

 

At this point dude, you are as blind as any other fanboy i met on my life.

[Teabaggin Krogan]

I'm not saying there aren't differences at all, I'm just saying they're very minimal.

 

Yeah a magic build can break blocks instead of countering them or just spam Igni. So can a sword build, they simply have lower numbers.

 

The whole "enemies are weak to specific things" thing is cool considering the whole witcher angle but against a golem I'm going to use Yrden regardless of what build I have and use the appropriate oils on my weapons.

 

No build really provides new and unique mechanics. The closest they get is a bit of a change to how the sign works in the magic tree. It's not the worst thing I've ever seen, but I'd still consider it fair criticism of the game's combat.

...

 

Yes but those numbers do make a lot of difference in game and how you play. You aren't gonna depend on Igni all that much if it does pathetic damage and you have an abysmal stamina recharge. For example during a particular fight against another witcher, you can either counter his strikes with swords and do damage, depend on signs to slow him down and weaken him or resort to poisons and bombs. 

 

To draw a parallel, that would be like saying that all builds are basically the same in ME3 since any build can use any gun and the differences are only in numbers. You just shoot at your enemies and use power combos but the principle of dealing with an enemy say an atlas is the same, namely strip shields with respective powers and punch through armor with the respective ammo or power combos.  

 

I guess this is a matter of preference anyway but still I feel it applies to the topic since we're discussing gameplay, something that affects Mass effect as well. 

[txgoldrush]

LOL TW3 isnt the bar for anything........

 

 /sigh..........

 

At this point dude, you are as blind as any other fanboy i met on my life.

The acclaim it got proves otherwise. and I am talking about the places where TW3 excels.

 

And really what TW3 doesn't do well, game designers aren't going to copy anyway because what it doesn't do well will be unique for that game.

[Drakoriz]

The acclaim it got proves otherwise. and I am talking about the places where TW3 excels.

 

And really what TW3 doesn't do well, game designers aren't going to copy anyway because what it doesn't do well will be unique for that game.

 

 

Sorry, bad from my part. it took me 10 sec after the last post to just look every post you ever made and they are all the same, blinding praising Witcher 3 over everything else. And probably you do this on other games forums too...... it was nice but really i prefer having a conversation with a wall.

 

 

 

=D hahhaha way to edit your post after i post mine hahahah

[AresKeith]

Dutch is that you?

 

Nope it's Goldrush the Dutch before Dutch happened

[ZipZap2000]

That's a hard thing to do. And Mass Effect 2 is Bioware best game.

Without doubt. Looking back at it, it actually could have been even better.

Still my fav.

Edit:

Oh and the Witcher sucks even harder if its best content was only just released to be played. Its a bit like Destiny holding back their story Imo.

[txgoldrush]

Sorry, bad from my part. it took me 10 sec after the last post to just look every post you ever made and they are all the same, blinding praising Witcher 3 over everything else. And probably you do this on other games forums too...... it was nice but really i prefer having a conversation with a wall.

How is it blind praise?

 

So whens someone's praise disagrees with you, its blind?

 

Is TW3 perfect? No. But it does set the bar for AAA open world titles for what it does. Watch whats going to happen to games that fail to reach that bar and keep doing what they are doing.