Jump to content

Photo

I guess....Movie in 2019 or 2020


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1
Addictress

Addictress
  • Members
  • 3,045 posts

Based on this article: http://www.gamespot....r/1100-6413871/

... which says it's 5 or 6 years away, as of 2013.

 

And the fact Mr. Arad's production credits of tentative productions only go out to 2018 as of this year.

 

What do you think? Perhaps, on the cusp of Andromeda's release, or depending on Andromeda's initial success, then they will announce a tentative production for 2019 or 2020.

 

Unfortunately, Avi Arad's production credits are mostly...um... Iron Man's and Fantastic Four's *barfs* Granted, I really loved the first Iron Man. But that's just one film out of so many on that list... =/

 

We need to write him letters to persuade him to invest in cerebral directors unlike anything before. Right? Or does he have redeemable movies in his IMDB credits? Look at them. Anything encouraging there? Or are we doomed?



#2
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23,771 posts

I guess Spider-Man and the first 2 X-Men movies are alright, though they aged horribly. This doesn't help boost any optimism for a Mass Effect movie regardless, though I had terribly little already. 


  • Addictress likes this

#3
Addictress

Addictress
  • Members
  • 3,045 posts
They need Christopher Nolan

#4
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23,771 posts

They need Christopher Nolan

 

 

As much as I like some of his work, particularly the Dark Knight trilogy, I don't think his style would really suit a franchise like Mass Effect. I just don't trust that he'd give the source material the sense of fun that I believe any Mass Effect title really requires to work. In truth, Mass Effect is actually very silly throughout, and that's part of the reason I love it so much. ME3 does try to take itself more seriously, but really, it could've been a lot more serious than that, considering what was happening in the story. Maybe I'm just really spoiled by having an expansive game world that lets me get past some of the daft plotlines and just enjoy hours of character content, something a movie can't really get away with. 



#5
Addictress

Addictress
  • Members
  • 3,045 posts
Oh god that's where I disagree. I enjoyed the serious and melodramatic aspects of Mass Effect and would rather a film focus on them and try to downplay the silliness.

I believe the series is epic and serious overall.

#6
Arsen

Arsen
  • Members
  • 14 posts
Although I would love to see a Mass Effect movie, there is a downside to it that would never be compensated even by an almost infinite amount of pros: the movie would establish canonicity.
While Commander Shepard in the movie can be easily modelled after the "default" model (which BioWare already created back in 2007), there are some major plot elements which will have to be decided upon, and unlike the game, the movie will most definitely give us only one decision. I doubt that an "interactive movie" will be created, in which upon reaching key decisions the viewers will have to choose (or vote) for one option or the other.

While the content part of the series' fans will at least accept this as a "possible option", and the minority will limit themselves only to making those choices every next time they play, denying possible alternatives altogether (me included), among the "least content" part of the series' fans (and that is the majority, as I see it) this movie will definitely cause considerable outrage and negative reviews, with the movie losing in the end.

#7
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23,771 posts

Oh god that's where I disagree. I enjoyed the serious and melodramatic aspects of Mass Effect and would rather a film focus on them and try to downplay the silliness.

I believe the series is epic and serious overall.

 

I dunno. For the most part, the impression I got from Mass Effect as a whole is a very comic book-ish space opera romp. What keeps me hooked on the trilogy is largely its sense of humor and lightheartedness in contrast to its serious undertones. Saren is so obviously sinister that it's hilarious. Benezia's lines are so cheesy that they hurt, but somehow a slightly good hurt? (masochism?) Sovereign's dialogue collapses under the weight of any serious scrutiny, but the vocal effect is cool. Salarians in general are hard to take seriously, which makes heartfelt moments with Mordin all the more meaningful. Seriously, salarians are one of those aliens that I can see being part of a fake alien-found-on-the-roadside video on YouTube. 

 

Forget about Mass Effect 2. It basically takes this silliness to a head with its cast of misfits and ridiculous plotlines, with tragic backstories to add as much spice as their ridiculous outfits, except for Jacob I guess, who I guess plays the straight-guy in all this. Then there's the Illusive Man, who's so obviously a future villain that we just have to work with right now. 

 

Even ME3, with its reaper genocide going on, somehow tries at times to stay generally lighthearted. I guess my thing is that these things help to gloss over what I feel to be an absolute mess of an overarching plot. While that overarching plot could (and should) very well change with a film adaptation, I don't think being all that serious and melodramatic throughout would do it any favors. 

 

Really though, this is really the least of my concerns regarding any Mass Effect movie. I just don't want any kind of default Shepard, who chooses to do this and that, but I've come to terms with the idea that any Mass Effect movie is just not for someone like me.



#8
planehazza

planehazza
  • Members
  • 631 posts

I'm almost wondering if Neil Blomkamp's gritty style would suite an ME movie.  All of his films are very samey, and Chappie was just aweful, but his style might work for a renegade Shep, set in the ME3 part of the story...



#9
Tonymac

Tonymac
  • Members
  • 4,300 posts

Although it would be some other Sheperd and not my own, I really can't see me sitting through ME3 again (much less paying to).  I bet Hollywood would choose a different ending.

 

If it were ME1, sure.  Show me the glory of the Citadel in full Hollywood detail, with an epic chase after a rogue SPECTRE  - just dump all of the silly side missions and hours of rolling about in the Mako on impossible terrain.

 

ME2, although it does not advance the ME story is pretty much already a movie in its own right.



#10
Exile Isan

Exile Isan
  • Members
  • 1,843 posts

I still think any movie dealing with the Mass Effect universe should start with the First Contact War. This would be an excellent way to introduce the Citadel races, humanity as of 2157, the Systems Alliance, the technology, etc. You could even have Anderson as the main protagonist. It won't happen though. They'll just ruin the Shepard trilogy instead.


  • planehazza likes this

#11
iM3GTR

iM3GTR
  • Members
  • 1,168 posts

I still think any movie dealing with the Mass Effect universe should start with the First Contact War. This would be an excellent way to introduce the Citadel races, humanity as of 2157, the Systems Alliance, the technology, etc. You could even have Anderson as the main protagonist. It won't happen though. They'll just ruin the Shepard trilogy instead.


The Shepard trilogy already was ruined by ME3.
  • Tonymac likes this

#12
Tonymac

Tonymac
  • Members
  • 4,300 posts

The Shepard trilogy already was ruined by ME3.

 

Not to mention the whole galaxy - ruined so bad, in fact that they made us galactic invaders in Andromeda to avoid the wreckage of ME3's writing.  We will be rogue pirates, stripping other galaxies of tech.  So much for being the good guys.