Would you like omni-blades to be removed from ME?
#76
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 08:00
- Hammerstorm aime ceci
#77
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 08:00
now that doesn't make any Sense, anywhere. Unless you meant omni hammer. I'm find with blades.No, I liked the heavy melee system in ME 3. That said I wouldn't mind seeing it evolve. Would love to wield a biotic hammer
#78
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 08:06
now that doesn't make any Sense, anywhere. Unless you meant omni hammer. I'm find with blades.
There is a Krogan in ME 3 multiplayer that wields a big ass hammer, I think it can carry a biotic charge or an electric charge. Haven't played it in a long time but it could work.
#79
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 08:12
Oh that. I thought you meant a hammer made out of biotics. I forgot about that. My bad.There is a Krogan in ME 3 multiplayer that wields a big ass hammer, I think it can carry a biotic charge or an electric charge. Haven't played it in a long time but it could work.
#80
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 09:00
By "slower" I meant that it would take much more time to kill an enemy by only punching.
And I want to hear my enemies scream while I'm at it.
Please leave.
Too bad. So are lightsabers.
Uh, OK?
#81
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 09:14
#82
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 09:16
I can't leave, I'm THE OP! HAHAHAHAHARRRRRRR!!!!!
Please leave.
Uh, OK?
#83
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 09:18
- SKAR aime ceci
#84
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 11:12
Well, those hypervelocity rounds are somewhat less lethal than what we're using now, given the way defenses work in the setting.
And knives are even less lethal still due to superior full body armor. Which is incidentally why nobody used them until rule of cool took over.
#85
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 11:14
It depends. First what kind of metal is it made of, second is the sharpness.And knives are even less lethal still due to superior full body armor. Which is incidentally why nobody used them until rule of cool took over.
#86
Posté 10 juin 2016 - 11:42
#87
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 12:03
And knives are even less lethal still due to superior full body armor. Which is incidentally why nobody used them until rule of cool took over.
Or really tough spandex ![]()
- Tatar Foras et iM3GTR aiment ceci
#88
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 12:26
For anyone arguing that swords are stupid and would.never cut through armor I read.an article on how a "monomolecular" blade is supposed to be insanely sharp. I quote,"weapons that have been sharpened to a single atom are a particular type of absurdly sharp blade that are so sharp, their cutting edge can be measured in terms of atoms or molecules, often being just a single molecule wide. This usually gives the weapons absurd cutting power,..."
Nice, you quoted the "Sharpened to a Single Atom" page at tv tropes.
http://tvtropes.org/...edToASingleAtom
This is definitely a scholarly article on the subject.
If anybody at home wants to do a fun experiment, you can get yourself a nice piece of obsidian with a blade width on the order of tens of atoms. Next find some mild steel and attempt to cut it.
- Hammerstorm et SKAR aiment ceci
#89
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 12:28
Science fiction man. That's why it cuts through armor. Soooo sharp.Nice, you quoted the "Sharpened to a Single Atom" page at tv tropes.
http://tvtropes.org/...edToASingleAtom
This is definitely a scholarly article on the subject.
If anybody at home wants to do a fun experiment, you can get yourself a nice piece of obsidian with a blade width on the order of tens of atoms. Next find some mild steel and attempt to cut it.
#90
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 12:28
Or really tough spandex
This reminds me of the discussion in the other thread about bullet proof vests not being resistant to stabs. You can get kevlar that is stab resistant, but it is weaved differently than in the bullet proof vests.
edit: and for the record, with respect to the topic of this thread, I am not really necessarily opposed to omniblades, although the soldier stab makes the most sense with it, not the sentinel slice.
#91
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 12:40
The question was never "what are monomolecular blades?". The question was "does anyone else find omniblades out of place in ME?". By extension, swords are always brought up, because many of us find them annoying and utterly out of place in Mass Effect. They simply seem more appropriate for anime to me, and no amount of cross-referencing other scifi will change that. Such things are very much at home in some settings. Mass Effect is not such a setting, in my opinion.
I hope we have seen the last of them. There has been enough similar sentiment expressed that I'm optimistic that this hope might be fulfilled. Many of us want a return to the slightly less fantastic days of Mass Effect. Things got more ridiculous with each game, and the swords and omnitool weapons are just one egregious example. It's time to rein things in and clean up the muck.
- Hammerstorm aime ceci
#92
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 12:50
I see.a lot.of monomolecular stuff around. The point is that they work because of sci-fi. People be like oh that is absurd and impractical. Oh monomolecular blades can't cut into armor. why do phantoms use it? Cause it freaking cuts through armor. Are omni blades out of place? It's like saying energy swords are out of place in Halo. Or the lancer is out of place in gears of war. Who puts a chainsaw on a gun? They've become part of the franchise. Other games don't have omni blades. That's what's cool about mass effect. It's pretty clear they aint going away. And they're bad@$$ to use.SKAR, I think you often forget that many of us have been playing home video games for over three decades, now. Some of us have been reading science fiction for a similar period of time, or even longer.
The question was never "what are monomolecular blades?". The question was "does anyone else find omniblades out of place in ME?". By extension, swords are always brought up, because many of us find them annoying and utterly out of place in Mass Effect. They simply seem more appropriate for anime to me, and no amount of cross-referencing other scifi will change that. Such things are very much at home in some settings. Mass Effect is not such a setting, in my opinion.
I hope we have seen the last of them. There has been enough similar sentiment expressed that I'm optimistic that this hope might be fulfilled. Many of us want a return to the slightly less fantastic days of Mass Effect. Things got more ridiculous with each game, and the swords and omnitool weapons are just one egregious example. It's time to rein things in and clean up the muck.
#93
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 01:02
With each subsequent game, the "rule of cool" introduced more action movie and anime type stuff into the setting. It might've been fun for many, but I feel like it dilutes the ambience of the setting. I'd like to see some of it scaled back, and some of the extreme stuff removed entirely.
I realize everyone has different tastes. If swords somehow remain part of MEA, I'll likely still play it (assuming they're a small, completely optional part). I'd rather have a game that mostly pleases me and sells really well, than to have a game I view as perfect but that no one else will buy.
Edit: typo
#94
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 01:05
Nothing's ever perfect. If something is perfect to you it's crap to other people. Opinions man. Right or wrong everyone has one.I don't play any of those other series. What I liked about Mass Effect back in 2007 was that it felt less "video gamey", to use a silly term that works. It was set in the near future, and at least pretended to try to stick more toward the science fiction side of things than many other series. Yes, the basic concepts were compete fiction, but if you accept those concepts going in, there was a consistency and feel to the world that was pretty different.
With each subsequent game, the "rule of cool" introduced more action movie and anime type stuff into the setting. It might've been fun for many, but I feel like it dilutes the ambience of the setting. I'd like to see some of it scaled back, and some of the extreme stuff removed entirely.
I realize every has different tastes. If swords somehow remain part of MEA, I'll likely still play it (assuming they're a small, completely optional part). I'd rather have a game that mostly pleases me and sells really well, than to have a game I view as perfect but that no one else will buy.
- Element Zero aime ceci
#95
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 01:40
It's like saying energy swords are out of place in Halo. Or the lancer is out of place in gears of war. Who puts a chainsaw on a gun? They've become part of the franchise. Other games don't have omni blades. That's what's cool about mass effect. It's pretty clear they aint going away. And they're bad@$$ to use.
It's actually nothing like that. Lancers and plasma swords have been part of GoW and Halo since the beginning, Ninja swords and omni-blades were added in ME3 out of ****ing nowhere. Lancers are so intrinsically linked to GoW that they were part of the very first teaser for GoW1 and are essentially everything you need to know about that entire franchise(macho, over the top, kind of stupid in the best way). That is definitely not the case for swords in Mass Effect.
- Element Zero aime ceci
#96
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 02:02
I knew you were going to say that. But I worry not. They're gonna be in MEA anyway.It's actually nothing like that. Lancers and plasma swords have been part of GoW and Halo since the beginning, Ninja swords and omni-blades were added in ME3 out of ****ing nowhere. Lancers are so intrinsically linked to GoW that they were part of the very first teaser for GoW1 and are essentially everything you need to know about that entire franchise(macho, over the top, kind of stupid in the best way). That is definitely not the case for swords in Mass Effect.
#97
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 02:14
I knew you were going to say that. But I worry not. They're gonna be in MEA anyway.
You knew I was going to counter your argument so you went ahead and made the losing argument anyway?
#98
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 02:26
I knew you we're going to talk about the whole they were in the beginning argument. I "win" because omni blades aren't going anywhere. That's all I care about. They are now part of the mass effect universe just like the lancer is part of gears. Can't change that because you think it's stupid. There is really no winner to this argument. These are just opinions at the end of the day. Theyve already been established in the universe. there's no point whining about getting rid of them. A lot of people like them and bioware knows this. I just like omni stuff end of story. If they bother you that much go play some mass effect 1or 2. There's always somethin to complain about. 9 months or so from now we will argue again about something else. Maybe the jetpacks or the mako. Wait and see.You knew I was going to counter your argument so you went ahead and made the losing argument anyway?
- 10K aime ceci
#99
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 03:09
Honestly i enjoy the omniblades, replaying the trilogy as i play through i actually miss using the omni blade as im playing 1+2, I remember when i first played mass effect 3 and thinking holy crap, this is our melee now? and was excited, considering all i was used to in 1+2 was elbow bashing things into the ground
- Dalakaar, Shinrai et SKAR aiment ceci
#100
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 04:00
Honestly i enjoy the omniblades, replaying the trilogy as i play through i actually miss using the omni blade as im playing 1+2, I remember when i first played mass effect 3 and thinking holy crap, this is our melee now? and was excited, considering all i was used to in 1+2 was elbow bashing things into the ground
I thought the same thing. Next step in my head is, "Now that they've set precedence, I hope they expand on it further."





Retour en haut






