OMG I THINK SOLAS IS EVIL!
#1
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:02
#2
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:20
#4
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:22
So basically you think his entire characterisation for a full 150 hour game is false, and everything his writer has said about him is a direct lie because of the way the voice actor said he liked the quiet? ![]()
#5
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:24
Which could have been a reference to anywhere in the Dales and not a graveyard in particular.
#6
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:28
#7
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:32
There are other clues... pay close attention... there are very subtle sinister undertones. Like when he doesn't want you to drink from the well of souls... I think it is because he killed Mythal and does not want an elven claiming her memories, the truth, the power.
Wait, I'm stopping you right there. We know Solas did not kill Mythal, Abelas tells us this.
#9
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:36
#10
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:42
#12
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:54
Um. I take it you haven't played Trespasser?
Yes I have... numerous times... please read my other posts for additional information.
#13
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:58
Wait, I'm stopping you right there. We know Solas did not kill Mythal, Abelas tells us this.
Why do you believe Abelas? Even if you do... they talk about taking away memories the entire game... look at the whole character development of Cole... he heals... wipes memories... they can't even remember him existing... doing it... hence the invisible boy... pay close attention to his interactions with Solas... where Solas makes Cole forget...
#14
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 09:59
OK, ignoring how insane this idea is in the first place, and how it relies on you not liking the delivery of a few lines which no-one else has had issue with -
It's a worse story. You are saying instead of a three dimensional, nuanced character, who has good points, but also massive flaws, and who makes mistakes but has understandable motivation for why he does what he does, he should just be "evil" and "insane". That's just terrible writing, and considering the entire Dragon Age series has always shown it's antagonists to be characters first, not just evil caricatures for you to cut down, I don't think they are going to not only going to start doing that now, but spend an entire game setting up a plot twist that they couldn't be bothered to write villains with actual motivation anymore.
There's also the fact that this would invalidate the previous plot twist that the Dread Wolf wasn't what we expected. You can't spend an entire game building up to a massive twist ending like that, just to go "Nah, not really, just kidding" in the next game.
- Illyria, KumoriYami, Lady Artifice et 3 autres aiment ceci
#15
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 10:04
OK, ignoring how insane this idea is in the first place, and how it relies on you not liking the delivery of a few lines which no-one else has had issue with -
It's a worse story. You are saying instead of a three dimensional, nuanced character, who has good points, but also massive flaws, and who makes mistakes but has understandable motivation for why he does what he does, he should just be "evil" and "insane". That's just terrible writing, and considering the entire Dragon Age series has always shown it's antagonists to be characters first, not just evil caricatures for you to cut down, I don't think they are going to not only going to start doing that now, but spend an entire game setting up a plot twist that they couldn't be bothered to write villains with actual motivation anymore.
There's also the fact that this would invalidate the previous plot twist that the Dread Wolf wasn't what we expected. You can't spend an entire game building up to a massive twist ending like that, just to go "Nah, not really, just kidding" in the next game.
OK, ignoring how insane this idea is in the first place, and how it relies on you not liking the delivery of a few lines which no-one else has had issue with -
It's a worse story. You are saying instead of a three dimensional, nuanced character, who has good points, but also massive flaws, and who makes mistakes but has understandable motivation for why he does what he does, he should just be "evil" and "insane". That's just terrible writing, and considering the entire Dragon Age series has always shown it's antagonists to be characters first, not just evil caricatures for you to cut down, I don't think they are going to not only going to start doing that now, but spend an entire game setting up a plot twist that they couldn't be bothered to write villains with actual motivation anymore.
There's also the fact that this would invalidate the previous plot twist that the Dread Wolf wasn't what we expected. You can't spend an entire game building up to a massive twist ending like that, just to go "Nah, not really, just kidding" in the next game.
No it is inspired writing based on lore... with other inspirations... other religions, hence the Elven influence... the Chantry aka the church, religion etc. It isn't bad writing if you find out in the next game that I am right and you totally fell for it... they are toying with your romantic sentiments... just like Dread Wolf would... it is brilliant if they are truly embracing the idea... the character as a whole... even using him to trick... deceive players... fans...
#16
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 10:08
No it is inspired writing based on lore... with other inspirations... other religions, hence the Elven influence... the Chantry aka the church, religion etc. It isn't bad writing if you find out in the next game that I am right and you totally fell for it... they are toying with your romantic sentiments... just like Dread Wolf would...
Yes, writing a villain who's only motivation is "evil" and "insane" is bad writing. That's the first lesson anyone learns about writing characters.
Writing isn't about "tricking" the viewer into thinking a story has more nuance than it does, and then laughing at them when you reveal the only explanation is for the plot is "insanity".
- duckley, Illyria et roselavellan aiment ceci
#17
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 10:10
So basically you think his entire characterisation for a full 150 hour game is false, and everything his writer has said about him is a direct lie because of the way the voice actor said he liked the quiet?
No there is a lot more reasons... please read my other posts...
#18
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 10:13
Yes, writing a villain who's only motivation is "evil" and "insane" is bad writing. That's the first lesson anyone learns about writing characters.
Writing isn't about "tricking" the viewer into thinking a story has more nuance than it does, and then laughing at them when you reveal the only explanation is for the plot is "insanity".
Not if he is based on actual lore, inspired by actual writings... and they aren't ending it with oh he is evil... he is insane... they left it with you not knowing... not sure... or seeing him in a way that is deceptive... tricking you... which honors his character and overall inspiration... it is brilliant writing...
#19
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 10:19
#20
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 10:49
#21
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 10:52
#22
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 11:15
Yes but Abelas could be loyal to Dread Wolf (or deceived him, which Dread Wolf is literally known for...) ... not Mythal... and guards her memories, the truth, from other powerful elves who might find them. There is something sinister about their interaction as well... play close attention... you will see it. Read the lore as well, it will open your eyes a bit. They are also playing around with religion... and are possibly introducing "the great deceiver" character... which is like the Devil... Satan... you know the king of all demons... they have mixed up a lot of lore for inspiration... who wants to destroy the world and recreate it... you can pluck out clue after clue of writer and character development inspiration. They wanted him to seem like a good guy, that is the point... he disguises himself... a wolf in sheep's clothing... hence he is a wolf...
Your theory is interesting, I'll probably start another playthrough to double check as I've never fully trusted Solas to be honest.
Though, why would Solas approve of Morrigan using the Well of Sorrows as opposed to the Inquisitor? Surely she would be aware of Solas's supposed treachery in equal measure to the Inquisitor by using the Wells?
#23
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 11:36
Like when he doesn't want you to drink from the well of souls... I think it is because he killed Mythal and does not want an elven claiming her memories, the truth, the power.
He says the same thing to all Inquisitors, regardless of their origin; he doesn't want ANY Inquisitor to drink, it has nothing to do with race.
Your theory is interesting, I'll probably start another playthrough to double check as I've never fully trusted Solas to be honest.
Though, why would Solas approve of Morrigan using the Well of Sorrows as opposed to the Inquisitor? Surely she would be aware of Solas's supposed treachery in equal measure to the Inquisitor by using the Wells?
He doesn't approve. Perhaps I'm not understanding your wording here. He doesn't trust Morrigan, but neither does he want the Inquisitor to drink. It's actually rather annoying because he's pissed either way and offers no explanation for it.
Patrick Weekes acknowledged that there were lines that he accidentally left out that would have made that scene play a bit better.
@PatrickWeekes
@princebec Yeah. My goof. Nothing more of substance, though. No key plot detail was missing, just flavor.
#24
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 11:53
He doesn't approve. Perhaps I'm not understanding your wording here. He doesn't trust Morrigan, but neither does he want the Inquisitor to drink. It's actually rather annoying because he's pissed either way and offers no explanation for it.
Patrick Weekes acknowledged that there were lines that he accidentally left out that would have made that scene play a bit better.
@PatrickWeekes
@princebec Yeah. My goof. Nothing more of substance, though. No key plot detail was missing, just flavor.
My apologies for my miscommunication. I was referring to this scene in the link above. Here, if the Inquisitor allows Morrigan to use the Well of Sorrows, Solas approves. Whereas if the Inquisitor uses the Well of Sorrows, he disapproves. - @4.44 in the link roughly.
#25
Posté 11 juin 2016 - 12:14
^ So you're referring only to approval points, then? In that video, at around 4:10 is Solas telling Morrigan to her face that she is a glutton drooling at the sight of a feast [power] and cannot be trusted.
I think the approval points in that case are not because he approves of Morrigan drinking, but that he is approving of the Inquisitor NOT drinking.
Keep in mind that the player in that video doesn't take most of the investigate options, so you do miss out on some Solas dialogue. He doesn't want either of them to drink, yet admits that it cannot go to waste. Because PW left out dialogue, we can't truly understand the reasoning behind his reaction.
- Almostfaceman, Gilli et infinityhaunlet aiment ceci





Retour en haut






