You mean testosterone?
That's the one, thanks.
You mean they aren't "bangable" enough for you?
You know, krogans are pretty ugly, but that doesn't mean they're bad or disappointing characters. I don't care of the characters aren't sexually attractive to me. I just want them to be good, cool and interesting. To be well-developed and be well-written. To be enjoyable as characters. A character can be sexually unattractive and still be interesting, if you look beyond how "bangable" they look.
And all of this talk about "ugh this asari is so ugly" is just making gamers look as shallow as anyone else.
No need for them to be 'bangable', hell, I don't give a damn about them being romance options or not. I feel it's strange that Asari tend to have a distinct face typology which I remember from the ME trilogy, and this was completely different. I am not about to debate taste, but I'm not a huge fan of the way it turned out.
As for the other one, I just disliked the way Sera looked, not in terms of prettiness, but in terms of overall design. A shiny face which just felt genuinely odd at times. Again, this has nothing to do with her being a romance option yes or no, since I genuinely couldn't care less, but just my opinion.
Try and slam me on my ideals on what I do and do not like in terms of character design, but don't insist on making me this, if it's not hot I don't want it, type of guy. I like deep characters as much as the next guy, and maybe the Asari and female will turn out to be great characters, but that doesn't mean I should necessarily like their character design in the graphical sense. As shallow as it may be, graphics is all I have to go on right about now.