
ME:Andromeda year of action possibly leaked?
#1
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:29
#3
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:34
Mass Effect 1 is set in 2183, this number says 2364. Flynn told a reporter that 400 years wasn't a 'bad guess'. Could be, could be. Nice find.
Although wouldn't ships be painted before leaving to Andromeda?
#4
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:34
Interesting....
#5
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:36
Then why not GX4632? year 2364-2186=178 years...so maybe the time traveled to Andromeda is 178 years.
#6
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:37
IMO it's just some kind of serial number.
- Elista et TurianSpectre aiment ceci
#7
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:42
IMO it's just some kind of serial number.
IT BETTER BE. 178 years is not long enough by far.
- PlatonicWaffles aime ceci
#8
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:44
This.Yeah, and they repaint it every year, because everyone should be able to remember what year it is just by looking at the ceiling.
Also it's not a goddamn leak if it comes from an official trailer.
#9
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:47
Or, you know, they use the GeForce GX 2364 for those holo maps
- Element Zero aime ceci
#10
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:49
I would imagine it makes more sense to display the name of the body you are orbiting or current system rather than simply the current year.
Assuming it is a display in the first place and not a hull number or something else.
#11
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 02:58
Could be anything... will probs get explained in the intro to the game
#12
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 03:03
As long as they leave after the events of Mass Effect 3, I'm happy either way.
#13
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 03:14
#14
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 03:38
As long as they leave after the events of Mass Effect 3, I'm happy either way.
They aren't. Sorry, but it's pretty much confirmed at this point. Walters heavily implied it (and sort of sarcastically, in a "duh" sort of way) in a recent interview. Or at least it came off that way to me a little bit.
#15
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 03:45
Like Walfum said, it's likely year of construction. OR. It could be the year we left The Milky Way and now the year is 2564 -- 2764. Depending if 200 or 400 years.
#16
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 03:58
Yeah, and they repaint it every year, because everyone should be able to remember what year it is just by looking at the ceiling.
Maybe it was the year the ship was made?
Or was the Tempest already inside one of the Arks?
#17
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 04:03
Yeah, and they repaint it every year, because everyone should be able to remember what year it is just by looking at the ceiling.
It's really unfair on the guy who paints it, since he has to spend his New Years Eve waiting until exactly midnight before repainting the year. Mind you, he doesn't have it nearly as bad as the guy in charge of painting the clock.
- Draining Dragon et UpUpAway aiment ceci
#18
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 04:05
It's really unfair on the guy who paints it, since he has to spend his New Years Eve waiting until exactly midnight before repainting the year. Mind you, he doesn't have it nearly as bad as the guy in charge of painting the clock.
Maybe a mech paints it. XD
#19
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 04:08
Like Walfum said, it's likely year of construction. OR. It could be the year we left The Milky Way and now the year is 2564 -- 2764. Depending if 200 or 400 years.
It's not. It's pretty much confirmed the Ark leaves pre-ME3 ending. My guess is it means nothing.
#20
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 04:40
Could be a reference to Star Trek: The Next Generation. The series starts in the year 2364.
If it is the construction date, then it would mean that it was constructed in Andromeda.
- Element Zero et UpUpAway aiment ceci
#21
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 04:40
Then why not GX4632? year 2364-2186=178 years...so maybe the time traveled to Andromeda is 178 years.
Why would they paint the current year on the ceiling of the ship? What possible benefit could that have?
#22
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 04:54
That depends on technology of course but I would assume 300 or 400.IT BETTER BE. 178 years is not long enough by far.
#23
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 05:03
They aren't. Sorry, but it's pretty much confirmed at this point. Walters heavily implied it (and sort of sarcastically, in a "duh" sort of way) in a recent interview. Or at least it came off that way to me a little bit.
"Duh, we're leaving during Mass Effect 3's events - there's no other way we can dig ourselves out of this hole we created with those endings other than going to Andromed-- I mean, so we can tell a brand new story."
#24
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 05:04
Or before. Remember, earth still intact in trailer and N7 day trailer."Duh, we're leaving during Mass Effect 3's events - there's no other way we can dig ourselves out of this hole we created with those endings other than going to Andromed-- I mean, so we can tell a brand new story."
- PlatonicWaffles aime ceci
#25
Posté 15 juin 2016 - 05:04
Im tired, someone do math again using Reaper speed (30 ly per day) how long exactly would it take to reach Andromeda. But not much more than 178 years





Retour en haut







