I think it's something like, some people are unable to get what they want from X so they torture, whereas others can get what they want more easily because they possess some other skill.
The moral question isn't about the validity of torture but whether you should allow people who need that extra edge to get what they need to do so.
Things are hardly ever that cut and dry. Sometimes there's a time element, sometimes there are other factors.
Sometimes by not using torture you might condemn innocents to death, etc.
(or have a nuclear bomb explode inside a city if we take the Jack Bauer angle)
If you don't allow any kind of torture and make it public that this is your policy, there's a bigger chance that someone (especially a fanatic)
will simply not talk because he knows that you can't really threaten him with anything.





Retour en haut








