They better not do anything like that. I swear, that's got to be the most pretentious thing about tie in novels that include major lore and characters.
You run into a character that you are expected to know from the novels, or you encounter an event that was only mentioned in the books, and when you (rightfully) criticize the main platform for lacking in properly explaining those things you get the whole "this was all covered in the book series".
It's like the creators of the setting are insinuating that you aren't a 'true' fan if you haven't read the mountains of tie in material.
Yeah, the games should have all plot critical material contained in the game. Having tie ins from books are fine, but not if knowledge of the books' contents are required to get a full picture of what's happening in the game.
Hopefully it'll sort of work out in the way Kahlee Sanders was implemented in Mass Effect 3.
You can encounter Kahlee, complete Grissom Academy, and come out of it not feeling like you were missing out on important stuff that was explained in the books.
However, for those that did read the books, Kahlee's appearance was slightly disappointing, but I understand her not becoming too much of a big thing, since that role was relegated to her appearances in the books.
Anyways, I'm excited for more Mass Effect books. I liked the first three from Drew, avoided Deception, and I'm hoping the fourth one by Mac is good.
Yeah, Kahlee is a good example of book related content done right. She wasn't vital to the main plot, her presence was still explained well in the Grissom mission without feeling like we were missing any information, but someone who's read the books could go "hey, cool! I already know a bit about her from the books!" Or Anderson's history with Saren. He mentions they have a past in ME1 and that's as much as we need to know, since we have other sources of information on how Saren's a bad dude.
I'm not convinced it did. It's not a good quest when you've read the books either.
It always seems to me that bad writing gets blamed on outside media when its really just bad writing.
I think WEWH was hobbled by relying on the content of ME. If the book hadn't been written, DAI would have had to supply more of the characterization and motivations for Celene/Briala/Gaspard. The devs designed that quest with the content of ME in their minds; even subconsciously they could have thought that the quest was explained since they already knew more of the backstory.
That's great! I love the Mass Effect books. I hope that Dark Horse also gets the go-ahead to give us a few more comics as well. I really enjoyed...
I think the comics featuring her came out after Citadel was released.
Mac really isn't as bad as people make him out to be. Yeah, he was part of the ending fiasco but so was Casey Hudson and we all love him. Mac's been on the team since ME1, he really isn't that bad of a writer and he knows the universe well (obviously).
Is that the overall consensus? I really don't know but I wasn't aware that Casey retained goodwill from fans while Mac didn't. I personally was never pleased that Casey seemed to be a key player in not wanting a gay Shepard and caved in ME3 due to Bio/EA influence.