I'd rather go back to talking about fantastic things from TW3 that Bioware could/should take on for later projects.
Go back? Wrong thread friend.
This thread is where I've posted the most in the last half year+. If I don't try to be productive here I'm likely to be going back to being disappointed in Bioware's treatment of the forums and ignoring things.
This thread is where I've posted the most in the last half year+. If I don't try to be productive here I'm likely to be going back to being disappointed in Bioware's treatment of the forums and ignoring things.
This thread appeared within the last day.
I'd like to talk about The Witcher 3's similarities to Super Mario Bros. and its inferiority to Witcher 2.
But that's probably not a good idea.
Super Mario?
Super Mario?
Yup.
"Your princess is in another castle!"
Well it's in a lot of games.
Yup.
"Your princess is in another castle!"
Just another example of TW3's sexism. The fact that it has a damsel in distress that has to be saved by some macho douche.
The fact that it has a damsel in distress that has to be saved by some macho douche.
Again, so?
So its misogyny.
It's not though lol... look I already said TW3 isn't my favorite game but if you have problems with it like it's literally stalking you in the night, then that's just weird.
So its misogyny.
Misogyny: dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.
How was Geralt misogynistic about Ciri? He felt none of these negative things towards her.
And how is saving a woman misogynistic? Does it go the other way too, where saving a man is misandristic?
This thread is where I've posted the most in the last half year+. If I don't try to be productive here I'm likely to be going back to being disappointed in Bioware's treatment of the forums and ignoring things.
http://forum.bioware...0#entry20331744
This is the ninja Witcher site on BSN. Feel free to post there. It's basically an off topic thread.
Misogyny: dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.
How was Geralt misogynistic about Ciri? He felt none of these negative things towards her.
And how is saving a woman misogynistic? Does it go the other way too, where saving a man is misandristic?
Best not to argue. There will be a diatribe on how it's impossible for females to be bigoted because of class oppression or what have you. Remember, it's SJW, it's completely divorced from reality.
This thread appeared within the last day.
Last half year+ of me posting.
In fact I'm going to parllell Natashina's point.. how many people (And/or LGBT) have met an actual member of the Patriarchy? Not seen one on TV or otherwise... or media like in person?
They believe it's true of all men. Remember, for these folks, generalizations are only bad if they negatively impact the favored group. If it negatively impacts the group they don't like, they're okay with that.
The creator of the topic is against sexism, but he/she is sexist.
Well, well, just the sexism of the others is forbidden.
You are so good.
They believe it's true of all men. Remember, for these folks, generalizations are only bad if they negatively impact the favored group. If it negatively impacts the group they don't like, they're okay with that.
Well sometimes you have to accept that not everyone is going to understand anything and everything about everyone, and sometimes resort to generalizations and attacks.
As stated in that nuked thread
"I see feminist as quintessentially idealistic but sometimes fragile and weak in constitution
I see patriarchy as strong but sometimes immoral and ignorant of ideals.
What’s needed is something that is the best of both worlds.
As well as mutual respect and understanding by both sides for strengths and weaknesses."
Anyway with all respect to Anita Sarkeesian I think the Damsel thing has been pretty severely misinterpreted, just because a female isn't first and foremost doesn't mean it's "misogynistic" or whatever, just like if the female is it doesn't automatically mean they are not.
It's more of a cliche.Just another example of TW3's sexism. The fact that it has a damsel in distress that has to be saved by some macho douche.
They haven't really hidden it very well, though. The formula is plain as day, and relies entirely on Geralt's relatively blue-collar job.
The writing's decent and personal with each one, but lumping too much praise on CDPR for their "game design" isn't right.
Well sometimes you have to accept that not everyone is going to understand anything and everything about everyone, and sometimes resort to generalizations and attacks.
As stated in that nuked thread
"I see feminist as quintessentially idealistic but sometimes fragile and weak in constitution
I see patriarchy as strong but sometimes immoral and ignorant of ideals.
What’s needed is something that is the best of both worlds.
As well as mutual respect and understanding by both sides for strengths and weaknesses."
I prefer the simpler approach "Anyone has the potential to be a saint or a dickbag."
Anita is that you...?
I was wondering the same thing myself.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
