I don't think its really individuality as we would understand it, and they clearly thought it was inferior to communal existence
It's absolutely individuality as we understand it because it's expressed it concepts we understand and according to simple democratic decision making processes we use. Writers suck at understanding what it means for something to be beyond our comprehension. It doesn't mean "complicated concept I don't get." It means "concept so alien it is impossible to understand by common reference".
A blind person doesn't see - but sight isn't beyond their comprehension as a concept. The experience of sight is if they're born blind, but these are different things. Your sense of self is beyond my comprehension - I have no way of understanding what it's like to be you apart from reference to my perception. But that doesn't make your experience generally beyond my comprehension.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






