1042 réponses à ce sujet

[Kabooooom]

I liked the hammerhead too. Better than the mako? It's better than ME1 mako but I didn't hate it. I did hate some of the landscapes. MEA mako? It looks good. The hammerhead, Well it hovers and has a gun so it's all a matter of opinion. Maybe in the next game the mako can have wheels and you can make it hover like the delorian.

Unrelated but, doesn't Marty McFly almost bang his mom in Back to the Future? It's been forever since I've seen that movie. Am I misremembering that? Either way, the 80s were a magical time in American cinema.

And what was that one movie called where a robot fell in love with a woman? Short Circuit? Lol.

[AlanC9]

Why can't it be for new fans? Wouldn't it be how EA promotes the game? As I said in another post, it would be like what they did with ME3 by promoting it being the best place to start playing a trilogy.

I meant that your suggestion doesn't offer new fans anything that they don't get with ME:A. I'm just looking for some advantage that makes this proposal better than what we're getting. Could you at least suggest one?

[SKAR]

Unrelated but, doesn't Marty McFly almost bang his mom in Back to the Future? It's been forever since I've seen that movie. Am I misremembering that? Either way, the 80s were a magical time in American cinema.

And what was that one movie called where a robot fell in love with a woman? Short Circuit? Lol.

She kissed him and yeah. My favorite movie trilogy.

[Kabooooom]

She kissed him and yeah. My favorite movie trilogy.

I really wanted a Delorean because of that movie when I was a kid and way too young to drive. Then when I was old enough to drive, I was like man that car kind of sucked.

If it time travelled though, I'd be all over that ****. Theres nothing I would love more than to royally screw up the space time continuum.

[SKAR]

I really wanted a Delorean because of that movie when I was a kid and way too young to drive. Then when I was old enough to drive, I was like man that car kind of sucked.

If it time travelled though, I'd be all over that ****. Theres nothing I would love more than to royally screw up the space time continuum.

Note to everyone, never give this guy a time machine. Delorians are super expensive now though. They're a collector's item.

[AlanC9]

Unrelated but, doesn't Marty McFly almost bang his mom in Back to the Future? It's been forever since I've seen that movie. Am I misremembering that? Either way, the 80s were a magical time in American cinema.

She was into it; he was freaked out. Heinlein actually played this straight in Time Enough for Love, IIRC.

[FKA_Servo]

She was into it; he was freaked out. Heinlein actually played this straight in Time Enough for Love, IIRC.

 

Heinlein really cut loose towards the end.

 

Time Enough For Love is one of the most quotable books ever, though. The notebooks of Lazarus Long can be particularly astute - when he's not getting that weird, at any rate.

[straykat]

I didn't have a problem with the Mako per se. I first played on 360. It just sucks by design. It had the weight of a tissue box and the maps looked like something I used to create in a 3d landscape prog called Bryce. By that, I mean it was pretty amateur-ish. Plus, there wasn't much to do on those planets anyways.

 

No, I'll be nostalgic about Mass Effect when it comes to characters.. but not this.

[SKAR]

I didn't have a problem with the Mako per se. I first played on 360. It just sucks by design. It had the weight of a tissue box and the maps looked like something I used to create in a 3d landscape prog called Bryce. By that, I mean it was pretty amateur-ish. Plus, there wasn't much to do on those planets anyways.

No, I'll be nostalgic about Mass Effect when it comes to characters.. but not this.

Well.....it was 2007. Give em some slack.

[The Twilight God]

I was only wrong if we were looking at the Extended Cut. You said I was stuck in the original endings and then said your whole theory was about the original endings.

You were saying the Kid said all synthetics would be destroyed, which is in the original endings. This was retconned in the EC.
 
  

It's also irrelevant, as I explained.

Of course. The Bad Writing Theory doesn't need evidence and doesn't need explanation. It just is. Just like a 6000 year old Earth that defies our understanding of the universe. The internal narrative of the universe, in this case the game, is thrown out the window. Which is why there is no reason for me to discuss this further with you.
 

Between your wild imaginings, animosity towards disagreement, and hate of Christianity, I'd think you were Gothpunkboy but you've made more sense.

 
I do not hate Christianity. I'm just using a the beliefs of certain segments of the Christian population to explain things. And I don't see how I've shown animosity toward you by simply not drinking your Kool-Aid. I disagree with you. That's it. Get over it.

[straykat]

Well.....it was 2007. Give em some slack.

 

I was making those Bryce landscapes years before

 

It was a pretty cool program in the 90s. https://en.wikipedia...ryce_(software)

[SKAR]

I was making those Bryce landscapes years before

It was a pretty cool program in the 90s. https://en.wikipedia...ryce_(software)

Interesting. No more Bryce landscapes now.

[straykat]

Interesting. No more Bryce landscapes now.

 

True, I expect the visuals to be good at least.. and the movement.

 

What I still don't expect them to do is make a good open world. DAI told me what they think about that subject. They seemingly got all the wrong type of people. MMO designers. That isn't "open world". It's just pointless space and theme parks.

[The Twilight God]

The Catalyst directs Shepard to the "power conduit." Had it not done so, Shepard would have been unlikely to figure out how to arm the Crucible for Destroy in her weakened condition, before the Reapers destroyed the Crucible. Additionally, if the Catalyst simply wanted the Reapers to win, it could have just not woken Shepard up at all and, well, let the Reapers destroy the Crucible. Or not even activated that elevator. Shepard being in a position for Destroy at all was the Catalyst's doing.

All this is explained in the thread under the destroy addendum. You can read it if you want. Or not. It doesn't really matter.

[KaiserShep]

You were saying the Kid said all synthetics would be destroyed, which is in the original endings. This was retconned in the EC.

 

 

I have the EC, and the Catalyst says "But be warned; others will be destroyed as well. The Crucible will not discriminate. All synthetics will be targeted". While we don't actually see this happen, the fact that EDI's name still shows up on the memorial wall still establishes that it does kill more than just the reapers. 

[SKAR]

True, I expect the visuals to be good at least.. and the movement.

What I still don't expect them to do is make a good open world. DAI told me what they think about that subject. They seemingly got all the wrong type of people. MMO designers. That isn't "open world". It's just pointless space and theme parks.

This isn't DAI. I'm not sure what to expect but it's gonna be a whole lot better than DAI. I feel it in my gut.

[Aren]

None of The Decisions Made in Me3 wont matter in Adromeda? 

 

I turned your title in the general principle of Bioware

[SKAR]

None of The Decisions Made in Me3 wont matter in Adromeda?

I turned your title in the general principle of Bioware

They matter for that Trilogy.

[AlanC9]

I have the EC, and the Catalyst says "But be warned; others will be destroyed as well. The Crucible will not discriminate. All synthetics will be targeted". While we don't actually see this happen, the fact that EDI's name still shows up on the memorial wall still establishes that it does kill more than just the reapers.

Additionally, in low-EMS Control states she doesn't go on the wall even if her mobile platform is vaporized.

[straykat]

This isn't DAI.

 

No, this is Bioware. Point still stands.

 

You don't make open worlds overnight. That's my point. It took specialists to make them right. It isn't some fad everyone can jump in on. The results when you do that is DAI, AC, and the majority of mmos.

 

I've never even played Trespasser, but from what I hear, they went back more to their old way of level design. They should stick with that. They're good at it. And they should do it with MEA too. Whoever told them that ME1 or open worlds in general was a model to follow is foolish. ME2 and ME3 is the way to go...if anything. 

[KaiserShep]

None of The Decisions Made in Me3 wont matter in Adromeda? 

 

I turned your title in the general principle of Bioware

 

 

 

But doesn't this say that our decisions will matter?

[SKAR]

No, this is Bioware. Point still stands.

You don't make open worlds overnight. That's my point. It took specialists to make them right. It isn't some fad everyone can jump in on. The results when you do that is DAI, AC, and the majority of mmos.

I've never even played Trespasser, but from what I hear, they went back more to their old way of level design. They should stick with that. They're good at it. And they should do it with MEA too. Whoever told them that ME1 or open worlds in general was a model to follow is foolish. ME2 and ME3 is the way to go...if anything.

I do not agree. I love space. I want to play this game for as long as I can.

[straykat]

I do not agree. I love space. I want to play this game for as long as I can.

 

That doesn't make sense to me. ME2 and ME3 were in "space" too. Y'know... it was the same series?

 

If anything, ME2 gave the setting more life.

[SKAR]

That doesn't make sense to me. ME2 and ME3 were in "space" too. Y'know... it was the same series?

If anything, ME2 gave the setting more life.

ehhh. This is a game slated for 2017. Now we have FROSTBITE. It's gonna be good. Wait and see.

[straykat]

ehhh. This is a game slated for 2017. Now we have FROSTBITE. It's gonna be good. Wait and see.

 

It might be pretty, but I've been talking about gameplay and level/world design. Not graphics. I could play Minecraft and appreciate it more.. even though it's ugly, it's a true open world. I could like lesser degrees of that as well (like TES), but Bioware is low on my list... in this case. I like Bioware for the things they're actually good at. Not for theoretical things and wishes.

 

Besides that, if they revert to ME1 as their inspiration, the gameplay will be taking a step back Imo. the only good shooting gameplay for ME happened on stages/levels (like ME2/3). In an open setting, it could be great if the AI is good. Nothing indicates to me they've done that though. Not with NPCS or wildlife.